1 / 40

Internet2, Abilene, and GigaPoPs: Una vista de los EE UU

Internet2, Abilene, and GigaPoPs: Una vista de los EE UU. Steve Corbató corbato@internet2.edu Director, Backbone Network Infrastructure University Corp. for Advanced Internet Development. Jornadas Técnicas RedIRIS 2000 Murcia, Espa ña 15 de noviembre, 2000.

kalkin
Download Presentation

Internet2, Abilene, and GigaPoPs: Una vista de los EE UU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internet2, Abilene, and GigaPoPs:Una vista de los EE UU Steve Corbató corbato@internet2.edu Director, Backbone Network Infrastructure University Corp. for Advanced Internet Development Jornadas Técnicas RedIRIS 2000 Murcia, España 15 de noviembre, 2000

  2. Advanced U.S. research university connectivity requirements • Research testbed • configurable, breakable, measurable infrastructure • serving computer science research and advanced engineering • traditional province of DARPA • Advanced service/application deployment network • standards based, 7x24 operation expectation (vBNSAbilene) • National education intranet • interconnecting all K-20 educational institutions/networks to enable applications and services unavailable over the commercial Internet • Commercial entities (high performance connectivity) • providers of content of value to EDU (e.g., Nexis-Lexis, Akamai) • EDU-related startups (genomics, IP networking)

  3. Unique features of Internet2 environment • Per capita available bandwidth O(10-100) higher than over the commercial Internet • TCP flows of 0.4 Gbps and higher possible • Active advanced service deployment efforts • Native multicast most widely deployed • Commitment to open network management and active measurement • Emphasis on end-to-end (e2e) performance measurment and assurance • Collaborative relationship with GigaPoPs and research university campus technical communities

  4. Outline • Internet2 project status • Abilene network status • Advanced services • International Transit Network (ITN) • Changes to the Abilene Program • Future infrastructure plans • New technologies • Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative – e2e • Campus networks

  5. Membership update • 179+ universities • 70+ corporations • 40+ affiliated research organizations • 30+ International MoU partners

  6. Internet2 Activities • Applications • Advanced applications with focus on research and education • Middleware • Interoperability across Internet2 institutions • Network Technologies • New network technologies across Internet2 networks • Network Infrastructure • Pre-commercial, production network infrastructure • Partnerships/Tech Transfer • Ensure this technology becomes available beyond Internet2

  7. Applications • Discipline focus • Health Sciences • Arts & Humanities • Support • Portable MPEG2 video conferencing • Portable SGI O2 for other demos • Portable Access Grid Node • Workshops • Survivors of the Shoah/Visual History Foundation: digital media • www.internet2.edu/apps

  8. High Definition Television/IP • Studio grade (200 Mbps UDP/stream) • Collaboration of University of Washington (Research Channel and Pacific/Northwest GigaPoP) and Sony • Raw HDTV/IP (1.5 Gbps) coming soon (Tektronix)…

  9. Throughput - Linear

  10. Middleware • Applications Needs: • Scalable, interoperable authentication and authorization (digital libraries) • Grid computation resources using Globus security, location and allocation of resources, scheduling etc. plugged into campus middleware infrastructures • Common authentication and storage (next generation portals) • www.internet2.edu/middleware

  11. Abilene Network

  12. Qwest acquisition of U S WEST

  13. Abilene – November, 2000 • Inflection point in network development • OC-48c (2.5 Gbps) IP-over-SONET backbone • 53 current and pending connections in 32 states • OC-48c connections: Seattle, Atlanta, SC2000 • 175 participants in 47 states and D.C. • Ongoing strong partnership • Cisco, Nortel, Qwest, Indiana Univ., ITECs (NC and OH) • Increasing backbone utilization • Characteristic exponential growth • O(OC-12c) peak utilization on some links • Traffic doubling time: 7 months

  14. Abilene Backbone – autumn 2000 Seattle New York Cleveland Indianapolis Sacramento Washington Denver Denver Kansas City Los Angeles Atlanta Houston

  15. Backbone developments • New router node (#11) in Washington DC • Northern California router node is moving from Sacramento to Sunnvyale • Houston-Atlanta link upgraded to OC-48c • Only one link (Seattle-Sacramento) remains at OC-12c • Increasingly distributed international peering • Peering with CUDI in Los Angeles (CENIC) and soon in El Paso (UTEP) • Abilene International Transit Network (ITN) in production • Collaboration with STARTAP and CA*NET3 • Backbone and connections were unaffected by Qwest’s acquisition of USWEST this summer

  16. OC12 OC3-12 STTL CA*net3, (AARnet) Abilene International Peering APAN/TransPAC, Ca*net3, CERN, CERnet, IUCC, NORDUnet, RENATER, REUNA2, SURFnet, SingAREN, SINET, TAnet2 , (ANSP, HARnet?) NYCM TEN-155*, JANET, NORDUnet, SURFnet CA*net3 (HEAnet) SNVA (SINET, GEMNET) LOSA SingAREN, SINET (HARNET?) AmPATH (REUNA2, RNP2, RETINA?) CALREN2 CUDI UT El Paso (CUDI) * ARNES, BELNET, CESnet, DFN, GRNET, HEAnet, RESTENA, SWITCH, HUNGARNET, GARR-B, POL-34, RCCN, RedIRIS

  17. Abilene International Transit Network • ITN concept developed as some international NRNs moved their U.S. circuit terminations closer to the landing points • By default, Abilene international peers are ITN participants • Non-participating international peers must indicate this intent to UCAID • Abilene ITN service commenced October 23, 2000 • ITN service currently does not extend to U.S. federal research and education networks • ESnet, NISN, NREN, DREN, DARPA Supernet • As an Internet2 backbone, vBNS has become an ITN participant

  18. CA*Net3 CERNET CUDI DFN (via DANTE) IUCC JANET NORDUnet RENATER REUNA2 SINET SingAREN SURFnet TANET2 TransPAC vBNS Current Abilene ITN participants (15)

  19. Abilene ITN implementation • BGP communities for international peers • 11537:2501 – ITN participants • 11537:2500 – non-ITN participants • Abilene ITN participants are tagged with ITN community on ingress (route map: TRANSIT-in) • Abilene ITN participants receive all routes with 11537:2501 community (route map: TRANSIT-out)

  20. BGP considerations for ITN participants

  21. ITN collaboration • Abilene, CA*Net3, and STARTAP are actively collaborating on international peering and transit issues in North America • In particular, Abilene and CA*Net3 have agreed to provide transit among their respective ITN participants • Abilene requires a Memorandum of Agreement and an Interconnection Agreement with the foreign NRN directly connected to CA*Net3

  22. Abilene program changes • General end of new OC-3c Abilene backbone connections • Existing and pending OC-3c connections will be unaffected • Revised fee structure for OC-12c and OC-48c connections • Objective is to incent bandwidth upgrades for existing connectors • Overall price reduction is ~15% • Encourage Packet-over-SONET (POS) connections • Expansion to serve the broader educational community

  23. Revised Abilene annual connection fees

  24. Sponsored Education Group Participation • Effective January 15, 2001, a networked aggregate of educational institutions may gain access to Abilene as a Sponsored Education Group Participant. • designed primarily to accommodate existing and emerging state-based education networks • reflects modified Abilene CoU • This new class of Abilene participation supplements the existing classes of Member Participant, Collaboration Site, and SponsoredParticipant • Applications will be accepted commencing 1/12/2000

  25. Advanced service deployment • Multicast • fully native deployment using current inter-domain protocols • PIM-Sparse, MBGP, MSDP • support for source specific multicast (SSM) in place • IPv6 • overlay testbed in production • Quality of Service (QoS) • QBONE via IETF Differentiated Services protocols • Abilene premium service testing starting • Measurement and Network Management • active probes (Surveyor) deployed in all nodes • open network management stance

  26. Building the Network of the Future – I • Upgrade Abilene to a leading-edge optical transport capability • Transition to OC-192c (10 Gbps) over DWDM backbone • Explore optical interconnection options with international networks (e.g., CA*Net4) & leading GigaPoPs • Establish a rapidly configurable, breakable Internet2 national testbed for the computer science research and the advanced network engineering communities • Interconnection and limited peering with the DARPA Supernet • Overlay networks (server-based) • Option of limited-term dedicated capacity via MPLS tunnels or DWDM λ’s

  27. Network of the Future – II • Continue the vital role of Abilene as a reliable platform for the development of innovative applications and the deployment of advanced services • IP remains the common bearer service • Position Abilene as a critical component of the Internet2 End-to-End (e2e) Initiative – in particular, its vital role within the U.S. research infrastructure • Emphasis on pro-active measurement and open network management • Increasing dependence on Abilene for next generation science

  28. Project NEPTUNE

  29. Network of the Future - III • Collaborate with the GigaPoPs on higher bandwidth attachments and the facilitation of international peering • Creative, localized solutions often required above OC-3c • Increasingly distributed set of international landing points and termination options

  30. GigaPoPs • Gigabit-per-second Point of Presence • OC-12 connectivity or greater (GbEth) • Regional aggregation point • high performance (HPNSPs) • commodity (NSPs) • Economies of scale • Member sites • Value added services shared by members • Not limited to research universities • (High-speed) local traffic stays local

  31. MREN (Chicago) CalREN2 (California) SoX (Atlanta/Southeast) Great Plains Network (Kansas City) P/NW Gigapop (Seattle) NYSERNET (New York) MAX (Washington D.C.) NOX (Boston) Front Range (Denver) Leading Regional Gigapops

  32. CalREN-2 Topology Plan (5/98) With thanks to David Wasley

  33. Importance of carrier hotels • Facilities where multiple telecommunications carriers have presences • Orginally exchanged just voice traffic • Often attract other related businesses – ISPs, Web hosting • Westin Bldg (Seattle), One Wilshire (LA), 60 Hudson (NYC) • Very active area of capital investment in the U.S. • Leading GigaPoPs establishing presences • Essential distinguishing factors • Riser capacity • Fiber interconnection room (‘meet-me room’) • Power – production and backup • Ease and speed of construction for tenant buildout • Local exchange point for peering among ISP tenants • Dark fiber from the local campuses is very enabling

  34. Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative • Extending focus from connectivity to performance experienced by end user • e2e will address all obstacles to performance • Application readiness and tuning • End system operating systems and networking support • Local Area Network and campus backbone upgrades • Outreach to end users and campus support teams • Widely distributed, pro-active measurement • Performance Evaluation and Response Teams (PERTs) • Hybrid of Network Operations Center and Applications Support Team • Phased approach • 10-15 campuses and GigaPoPs self-select for first stage • Campus network/applications workshop – UCSD – December, 2000

  35. End-to-End (e2e) PerformanceInitiative • Human to Human Collaboration Experience • Application • Operating system • Host IP stack • Network card • Local Area Network (LAN) • Campus backbone network • Campus connection to regional network/GigaPoP • GigaPoP connection to Internet2 national backbone

  36. Defining E2E Success Metrics • Selecting set of appropriate core applications and services • TCP applications – e.g., Web, file transfer • Internet-based telephony (VoIP) • Internet-based videoconferencing • Multiple technologies with distinct service levels • Pervasive multicast for multimedia and data distribution • Scope • How broadly across the campus network should e2e be supported? • Timing • How quickly can these goals be met? • End user expectation management essential

  37. Summary • Second wave of backbone development concluding • Advanced service deployment proceeding • Utilization growing • Moving to develop next generation backbone and to incent GigaPoP/campus connectivity upgrades • Focusing on assuring e2e performance • www.internet2.edu/abilene

  38. Upcoming Meetings • APAN/Internet2/NLANR/TransPAC • 28-31 January 2001, Hawaii • Internet2 Member Meeting • 7-10 March 2001, Washington, DC

  39. www.internet2.edu

More Related