Case Study  &  Westlaw
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 14

Case Study & Westlaw Loss of Consortium 配偶權之損害賠償 漢珍業務專員 楊學斌 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 100 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Case Study & Westlaw Loss of Consortium 配偶權之損害賠償 漢珍業務專員 楊學斌. Richard 和 Mary Anne Rodriguez ,於 1969 結婚。兩個人都有上班賺錢。 空閒時,他們一起參與許多社交、休閒活動。. 為了買棟房子,他們努力存錢。 他們很想要小孩,計畫能組個和樂融融的 大家庭 …. 但在婚後 16 個月後,發生了一件不幸 的事情 …. Richard 在工廠,被重達近 300 公斤的 鐵管擊中,導致半身不遂 …….

Download Presentation

Case Study & Westlaw Loss of Consortium 配偶權之損害賠償 漢珍業務專員 楊學斌

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

Case Study & Westlaw

Loss of Consortium 配偶權之損害賠償

漢珍業務專員 楊學斌


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

Richard和Mary Anne Rodriguez,於1969結婚。兩個人都有上班賺錢。

空閒時,他們一起參與許多社交、休閒活動。


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

為了買棟房子,他們努力存錢。

他們很想要小孩,計畫能組個和樂融融的大家庭…


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

但在婚後16個月後,發生了一件不幸

的事情…

Richard在工廠,被重達近300公斤的鐵管擊中,導致半身不遂……


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

Richard發生的意外,對Mary Anne的生命來說,變成了一場災難…

Mare Anne 辭掉工作,並且24小時照顧她的丈夫。


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

為減低褥瘡的發生機率,每天晚上,

她不能睡著…只為了幫先生翻身。

每天早上、傍晚,她幫先生盥洗更衣,並協助他坐上輪椅…


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

為照顧先生,造成了生活困難,並且Mary Anne再也無法養育小孩,共組家庭。

因此她對先生工作的工廠負責人,請求賠償「配偶權」(Loss of Consortium)


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of California, 1974

12 Cal.3d 382, 115 Cal.Rptr.765,525 P.2d 669


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Caption of Opinion(開頭):

Plaintiff、Defendant、Appellant、Respondent


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

12 Cal.3d 382, 115 Cal.Rptr.765,

525 P.2d 669

Citation(案號):

官方判決案號(冊數)(加州最高法院判決第三版)(頁數)


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

12 Cal.3d 382, 115 Cal.Rptr.765,

525 P.2d 669

Citation(案號):

非官方判決案號(冊數)(太平洋地區判決集第二版)(頁數)


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

12 Cal.3d 382, 115 Cal.Rptr.765,

525 P.2d 669

Supreme Court of California, 1974

法院與審級:

加州最高法院


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of California, 1974

12 Cal.3d 382, 115 Cal.Rptr.765,525 P.2d 669


Case study westlaw loss of consortium

Westlaw

線上檢索實例操作


  • Login