1 / 27

A minimum cross entropy model to generate disaggregated agricultural data at the local level

A minimum cross entropy model to generate disaggregated agricultural data at the local level. António Xavier 1 , Maria de Belém Martins 1 and Rui Fragoso 2 1 Sciences and Technology Faculty-University of Algarve and CEFAGE-UE , 2 Management Department, University of Évora

kalea
Download Presentation

A minimum cross entropy model to generate disaggregated agricultural data at the local level

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A minimum cross entropy model to generate disaggregated agricultural data at the local level António Xavier 1, Maria de Belém Martins 1and Rui Fragoso2 1 Sciences and Technology Faculty-University of Algarve and CEFAGE-UE , 2 Management Department, University of Évora The authors gratefully acknowledge partial financial support from FCT, program FACC. 122nd European Association of Agricultural Economists Seminar Evidence-Based Agricultural and Rural Policy Making Methodological and Empirical Challenges of Policy Evaluation February 17th – 18th, 2011, Ancona (Italy) Centro Studi Sulle Politiche Economiche, Rurali e Ambientali associazioneAlessandroBartolastudi e ricerche di economia e di politica agraria Università Politecnica delle Marche

  2. Contents • Introduction • The problem’s description • Previous studies • The methodological approach • The empirical implementation • Results • Validation • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • The lack of data-Portugal • The objective of the presentation • Overcome Lack of disaggregated agricultural data • Necessity of methods for different situations • A method for certain specific situations in Portugal the approach presented here results from a series of experiences carried out by the authors and it’s still under development Relevant for policy evaluation

  4. The problem’s formulation • In Portugal the specific situation may be described as follows: • Existence of aggregated data • Other co-variables: • Land use cartography • Biophysical data • Slope • Soils • Meteorological data • … • Necessity of disaggregated data at the following levels: County Parish Local (pixel,...)

  5. The problem’s formulation LAND USE MAPS CLIMATE DATA MAPS FARMS’DATA-REGIONAL LEVEL SOIL CAPACITY SLOPE DATA DISAGGREGATION ????????? HIPSOMETRY METEO STATIONS DATA Administrative units Local level

  6. Previous studies presented a two stages dynamicdisaggregation process which was able to recover a complete sequence of disaggregated data. Howitt and Reynaud (2003) have used a spatial disaggregation procedure combining a logit model with posterior density estimators to break down production data available at the regional level to a homogeneous spatial mapping unit level (HSMU) Kempen et al. (2005) proposed a spatial disaggregation model for crop production statistics based on a cross-entropy approach. You and Wood (2006)

  7. Previous studies used agricultural data in conjunction with biophysical processes to break down agricultural FADN regional data into 100m × 100m pixel spatial units. Chakir (2009) In Portugal: presented disaggregated data regarding land use for the Montado ecosystem area. Fragoso et al. (2008) proposed a model which estimates incomplete information at disaggregated level through an entropy approach Martins et al. (2010)

  8. The methodological framework • based mostly in the works of Chakir (2009), You and Wood (2006) and You et al. (2007, 2009) • combination of the different exposed ideas, in order to valorize all the existing information • It’s composed by 2 steps: • 1ºstep-Prior information database creation • 2ºStep-The cross entropy approach

  9. The methodological framework

  10. 1ºstep description • There are several ways of creating this prior and the diversity of information leaded to the exclusion of some predefined methods • combination of the following information: land use cartographical data, soil capacity maps, climate data, and other biophysical data, namely slope and hypsometric data. • Information is reclassified in a Geographical Information System (GIS) • accurate estimation for the biophysical conditions for which the use may be developed • experts’ opinions or the available cartographical land use data-prior estimation

  11. 2ºstep description Subject to: Land use Biophysical restrictions

  12. 2ºstep description Calculation of the area

  13. Empirical implementation • it was necessary to define concretely the study area: • Region of Algarve • 16 counties and 84 parishes

  14. Empirical implementation Region of Algarve Region of Algarve

  15. Empirical implementation The data used

  16. Empirical implementation • Considered the following farms’ uses: • cereals (CC); • Other temporary crops (OCT); • Fallows (PO); • citrines (CT); • other fresh fruits (OFF); • olive trees (OL); • almond trees (AM); • Other permanent crops (OCP); • permanent pastures (PP) • “other occupations” (OO)

  17. Empirical implementation • Appliedto theyear 1999 • UsedtheAgriculturalCensusdata • Necessityofvalidation

  18. Empirical implementation • The model was applied following two variants: • 1) disaggregation of data of the different administrative units (counties); • 2) disaggregation at a local pixel level (1 km2) • The errors’ limits definition • The lack of data • Some considerations • Other adaptations

  19. Results • 1º Variant of the model

  20. Results • 2ºvariant of the model • Data at pixel level Olive trees Citrines

  21. Validation • Deviation measures

  22. Validation • 1ºvariant of the model

  23. Validation • 1ºvariant of the model • The WPADi • The WPAD • 17,787%. Thecounties‘WPADi

  24. Validation • 2ºVariant • Limited to a sample of counties • It’s under development in some aspects

  25. Validation

  26. Conclusions • The model proved for the first time for Portugal a new way of disaggregating data • Some problems need still solution • Some results of the studies being carried out and now provide better results • Some examples • The future • Innovations

  27. Thank you for your atention!

More Related