1 / 31

André Faaij Copernicus Institute - Utrecht University

Rationale for Biofuels. ” Biofuels and biodiversity – towards a sustainable use of Bio-energy ” Organized by: Copernicus Institute – Utrecht University and KNAW’s Global Change Committee Amsterdam, 12 December 2007. André Faaij Copernicus Institute - Utrecht University. Peak oil Peak soil

kagami
Download Presentation

André Faaij Copernicus Institute - Utrecht University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rationale for Biofuels.”Biofuels and biodiversity – towards a sustainable use of Bio-energy”Organized by: Copernicus Institute – Utrecht University and KNAW’s Global Change CommitteeAmsterdam, 12 December 2007 André Faaij Copernicus Institute - Utrecht University

  2. Peak oil Peak soil Peak water Peak biodiversity loss Peak population Peak GDP Climate Agriculture Energy Biodiversity Poverty & development Houston we have a problem! And it is urgent!

  3. What’s it gonna be?

  4. Pathway vs. climate Bron: KNMI; Dorland

  5. Projections for global final energy demand for the four IPCC scenarios (A1, A2, B1, B2).

  6. Future world’s energy supply…(combined with 80% reduction of GHG-emissions): a portfolio of options is needed! Courtesy of IIASA Courtesy of Shell

  7. Agricultural land use! • We need a lot more food (especially protein). • We don’t have (a lot) more (agricultural) land. • Agriculture and livestock main threat for biodiversity (today…), main consumer of water, main emitter of GHG’s. • Agriculture and poverty interlinked: 70% of the world’s poor in rural setting; • Productivity in agriculture is awful on large parts of the globe. • Such agricultural practices often unsustainable as such. • Poverty (and lack of investment) key driver for unsustainable land use (erosion, forest loss).

  8. Potential land-use pattern changes(IMAGE) [Hoogwijk, Faaij et al., Biomass & Bioenergy, 2005]

  9. So… • Investment in agriculture (and livestock) is essential (2nd green revolution; see e.g. Fresco in collaboration with Faaij & Dijk); • This is feasible (FAO)… • …with increased water use efficiency, less land, protection of soils and better incomes. • But: what gets the money and sustainable economic activity into the rural regions?

  10. International bio-energy markets developing fast… • Excitement: • entered first phases of commodity market trading (ethanol); pellets the silent suprise. • Creates unique opportunities for both producers regions as importers. • Entrepreneurs and policy now deal with development of bioenergy in rapidly developing international context. • Concerns: • Fierce international debate on sustainability; remarkably fast response from governments, companies, NGO’s. • Different interests & perspectives on governance & policy • Vulnerable stage; many barriers remain

  11. Bio-ethanol flows 2000 (kton) Courtesy of UNCTAD

  12. Traded: 3 billion litres Global production: 32 billion litres Bio-ethanol flows 2004 (kton) Courtesy of UNCTAD

  13. More trade developments Bradley, 2006 IEA Task 40

  14. Bioenergy today • 45 EJ + 10 EJ total use • 9 EJ + 6 EJ commercial; non-modern • ~ 8 EJ Modern; commercial: • < 1 EJ electricity • ~ 2.5 EJ heat • ~ 1.5 EJ biofuels (bulk = ethanol; half of that ethanol sugar cane based) • Main controversy on biofuels from annual crops and palm oil. • Currently some 20 Mha in use for biofuels worldwide (compared to 5,000 Mha for food)

  15. 1st Generation (EU, US) Annual crops = food crops. Limited to arable land. Potential constrained. High costs; mainly feedstock. Poor - modest GHG and env. performance. Pushed by ‘simple’ policies. 2nd generation Lignocellulosic materials. Residues, wastes, arable, pasture, marginal and degraded lands. Potential large. Strong economic outlook: technology more important. Good – excellent GHG and env. performance Demanded by more sophisticated needs Generations… 3rd generation: optimized conversion, ‘surprise feedstocks’ (…). But it will take time!

  16. Perennial crops (vs. annual crops) • Lower costs (< 2 €/GJ) • Planted for 15-25 years • Low(er) intensity • Can restore soil carbon and structure • Suited for marginal/degraded lands • Requires less inputs (well below key threshold values) • Wide portfolio of species & production systems • Possibilities for enhancing (bio-) diversity • Adaptable to local circumstances (water, indigenous species) • Earlier development stage • Large scale and diverse experience needed • Learning curve to be exploited • Improvement potential Miscanthus x giganteus

  17. Yields: perennials ~3x annual

  18. GHG Balances IEA – Fulton, 2004

  19. Global potentials are large…; but need to be developed Agricultural land: <100- >300 EJ Marginal lands: <60- 150 EJ Agri residues: 15-70 EJ Forest residues: <30-150 EJ Dung: 5-55 EJ Organic waste: 5 - >50 EJ TOTAL: < 250 - > 500 EJ

  20. Bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass • SHF • SSF • SSCF • CBP • +BIG/CC… Major demonstrations In US/Canada, EU

  21. Ethanol plants US (status 2006) Global ethanolProduction &outlook Source: John Urbanchuk (data for Oct 31 2006; green = operating, red = under construction)

  22. Pre-treatment: - grinding - drying feedstock is poplar wood Gasification: - air or oxygen - pressurised or atmospheric - direct/indirect Gas cleaning: - ‘wet’ cold or ‘dry’ hot FT liquids Offgas Recycle loop FT synthesis: - slurry reactor or fixed bed Gas turbine Gas processing: - reforming - shift - CO2 removal Power Synthetic fuels from biomassBiomass & coal gasification to FT liquids - with gas turbine Major investments in IG-FT capacity ongoing in China right now: - Reducing dependency on oil imports! - Without capture strong increase in CO2 emissions… About 50% of carbon!

  23. What are we waiting for? Yueyang Sinopec-Shell Coal gasification project; (China) Shell gasifier arriving at site September 2006. 15 licences in China at present… Courtesy of Shell

  24. Economic performance 2nd generation biofuels s.t. & l.t.; 3 Euro/GJ feedstock Hamelinck & Faaij, 2006, Energy Policy

  25. Certification bioenergy (I): ongoing initiatives • Governments: UK, NL, D, B, and more EU nations…; EC. • NGO’s: • International bodies: UNEP, UNCTAD, FAO,… • Market initiatives/multistakeholder: roundtables on palm, soy and biofuels, GGL, Electrabel,… IEA Task 40:Van Dam et al., 2007; Biomass & Bioenergy, Forthcoming:

  26. Certification bioenergy (III): concerted action… • First time that governments actually try to set ‘sustainability criteria’ for a commodity! -> Paradigm shift with implications for food products, fodder, materials etc. • This takes time (allow for learning). • Varying degree of concern: palm oil/soy bean/corn… most debated, other (residues, wood) are approved by most stakeholders • Methodological issues to be resolved: competition, biodiversity, a.o. • Global convergence, dialogue and deployment priority (leaders needed).

  27. Biofuels roadmap (I). • Biomass resource base; the foundation: • Perennials; build experience! • Biomass resource (and land) base much more diverse than agricultural crops (and land) alone. • Biomass cultivation schemes (with perennials) can offer substantial ecological and socio-economic benefits when done right. • Develop biomass production in global market context (international trade & sustainability demands)

  28. Biofuels roadmap (II). • 2nd generation biofuels provide the economics energy & GHG balance to be the winning option. • Lignocellulosic based EtOH and gasification based synfuels compete. • Synfuels produced from biomass, coal and natural gas, provide flexible, large scale capacity (+CCS) • Hydrolysis units can start as ‘add-ons’ to current EtOH production capacity. • Lignocellulosic resources for power on shorter term (now); for fuels on medium term (before 2015).

  29. Stay with me for 4 more seconds… • Current crisis in crossing the global carrying capacity requires unprecedented action… • …and it has to be fast! • …and it will not be easy. • Bioenergy is at the nexus of land-use (2nd revolution!), development (poverty!), energy (oil!) and climate (carbon stocks!); this is a unique position. • We have the bioenergy options to achieve synergies (as well as the wrong ones)

  30. Stay with me for 2 more seconds… • Governance is the key; across policy fields (agriculture, energy, climate, development); consistent and stable. • Policies on biofuels redesigned: from one to multiple objectives. • Moratorium on ‘temperate climate biofuels’ seems wise; save money… • …and spend it on the right biofuels.

  31. "Modern bio-energy and biofuels have the potential to cover one third of the future world's energy demand on a sustainable basis and provide a key lever for much needed rural development on a global scale". “Postponing action and generating confusion is at this stage immoral”

More Related