1 / 55

National Contract Management Association

National Contract Management Association. SANDY COATS United States Attorney Western District of Oklahoma. Western District of Oklahoma. "There is no kind of dishonesty into which otherwise good people more easily and frequently fall than that of defrauding the government."

kael
Download Presentation

National Contract Management Association

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Contract Management Association SANDY COATS United States Attorney Western District of Oklahoma

  2. Western District of Oklahoma

  3. "There is no kind of dishonesty into which otherwise good people more easily and frequently fall than that of defrauding the government." Benjamin Franklin

  4. GOAL II: PREVENT CRIME, ENFORCE FEDERAL LAWS AND REPRESENT THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE Strategic Objective: Recover monies owed to the United States and victims as a result of fraud, loan default, and bankruptcy

  5. Ensure that citizens can rely on the honesty and integrity of government officials charged with the public trust Defending the public fisc against unwarranted claims

  6. Strategic Objective: Combat public and corporate corruption, fraud, and economic crime “The true cost of white collar crime is not always measured in dollars. The corruption of public officials undermines trust in government.”

  7. I WANT MY MONEY BACK!

  8. The Problem • Fraud cost U.S. organizations an estimated $994 billion in 2008! • The average organization loses more than $9 per day per employee to fraud and abuse • Approximately 7% of the total annual revenueof business is lost due to the fraud of it’s employees • $100 billion a year lost to health care fraud.* 2004 & 2008 Reports to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse” by Association of Certified Fraud Examiners 2008 *CNNMoney.com 01/13/10

  9. The Problem • More than $100 Billion in Lost Each Year to Fraud in Federal Programs.* • Nearly half of employees do not report company or employee misconduct.** • Limited Federal Resources *Fraud and Abuse in Federal Programs, CATO Institute (Aug 2009) **Fraud Magazine, Nov/Dec 2006

  10. CRIMINAL DIVISION • Oklahoma man sentenced to 12 months in prison for kickback scheme involving government contract in Afghanistan • Defendant conspired to solicit kickbacks from private security vendors in exchange for their favorable treatment in the contract bidding process

  11. CIVIL DIVISION • Technology Development Group, Inc. • Falsified testing of fighter ejection seat circuits • $400,000 Settlement

  12. CIVIL DIVISION • L-3 Communications • Arranged for the shipment of various components for DOD weapon systems which resulted in U.S. paying a higher price to freight carriers for shipping that was appropriate • $325,000 Settlement

  13. CIVIL DIVISION • Thunderbird Propellers, Inc. • Used unapproved aircraft parts in overhauls • $100,000 Judgment

  14. CIVIL DIVISION • Standard Testing • Failed to properly test building materials for military construction projects and submitted false testing documents • $100,000 Settlement, built new testing facility, terminated bad actor

  15. 15

  16. Affirmative Civil Enforcement Judy Copeland ACE Coordinator Western District of Oklahoma

  17. Affirmative Civil Enforcement ACE is the use of civil remedies to recover monies or advance significant federal program objectives. FCA: where there has been a false or fraudulent claim or false statement made to the United States. CIVIL PENALTIES: recover civil penalties pursuant to statutes

  18. Why ACE? • Targets economic incentive • Recovers taxpayer funds lost by fraud • Penalizes offender by imposing damages • Applies when portion of funds are federal • Protects program integrity • Serves as a strong deterrent • Requires a lower burden of proof

  19. ACE ‘Moves The Ball’ FCA claims and most alternative fraud claims need only be proved by a ‘pre-ponderance of the evidence (50% + a ‘smidgen’)

  20. ACE POLICIES • No monetary threshold amount • Program goals may be just as or more important • Entire Civil Division is available and committed to ACE • “One Team Approach” • Coordinate with Criminal Division • ACE is not just an alternative to criminal prosecution.

  21. Affirmative Civil Enforcement Civil Chief: AUSA Steve Mullins steve.mullins@usdoj.gov 405.553.8804 Deputy Civil Chief AUSA Kay Sewell kay.sewell@usdoj.gov 405.553.8807 ACE Coordinator: AUSA Judy Copeland judy.copeland@usdoj.gov 405.553.8829 HCF Coordinator: AUSA Lee Schmidt lee.schmidt@usdoj.gov 405.553.8745

  22. Lincoln's Law 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733

  23. "Worse than traitors in arms are the men who pretend loyalty to the flag, feast and fatten on the misfortunes of the nation while patriotic blood is crimsoning the plains of the south and their countrymen are moldering in the dust." A. Lincoln

  24. How Did We Get Here 1300s: English Law allows qui tams. Revolutionary War: Continental Officers are convicted of defrauding troops of pay and fraud stealing gov’t property. Civil War: Adulteration of supplies made “shoddy” a dirty word, Congress passes Frauds Act of 1863. 1874-1943: The 1863 Act was emasculated by a series of amendments between 1874 &1943. World War I: The deliberate inflation of prices (“profiteering”) during war is a crime.

  25. Time Flies . . . 1980s: Series of K scandals - $435 hammer, $640 toilet seat & $7,600 coffee maker. 1986: Lincoln legislation resurrected after K abuses, 1990-2000: Health care emphasis. 2009: Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, PL 111-21, 123 Stat 1617, strengthens FCA after what it is weakened through judicial decisions.

  26. FCA OVERVIEW The U.S. Attorney can institute a civil action in federal court against anyone presenting or causing to be presented a false or fraudulent claim. 31 U.S.C. § 3730 & Executive Order 6166, June 10, 1933.

  27. The False Claims Act Is The “Primary Litigative Tool For Combating Fraud” Against The Federal Government. Senate Judiciary Committee, False Claims Amendments Act of 1986, S.Rep. No. 345, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5266.

  28. FCA Liability The FCA lists 7 types of fraud (§3729(a)(1)(A-G) Liability exists for a person who knowingly presents, makes or causes to be presented a false or fraudulent statement/claim: 1. To receive money from the United States 2. To avoid or decrease an obligation to the US (a/k/a “reverse false claim”) 3. Or conspires to do so.

  29. Prohibited Acts False Claims: Person knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval (31 USC § 3729(a)(1)(A); False Records:Person knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim (31 USC § 3729(a)(1)(B)); Conspiracy: Person conspires to defraud under the seven prohibited Acts of the FCA (31 USC § 3729(a)(1)(C)). Reverse False Claims: Person knowingly conceals or knowing and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Gov’t. (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(G)).

  30. The FCA Claim ELEMENTS: • A “claim”(A request or demand) • “presented” (Gov’t, its agent or person with Gov’t money)for payment or approval • that is “false or fraudulent”and that the person submitting or causing to be submitted “knows”* to be false. 31 USC §3729(b)(1) * Requires no specific intent, and can be with reckless disregard of the truth.

  31. Knowledge Actual Knowledge of the False Information Act in Deliberate Ignorance of Truth or Falsity of Information; or Act in Reckless Disregard of Truth or Falsity of Information

  32. Materiality Two of the seven types of FCA fraud have a materiality provision. Liability for making or using a false record or statement (§3729(a)(1)(B)) and Liability for ‘reverse false claim’ (§3729(a)(1)(G)) Defined as ‘having a natural tendency to influence, or be capable or influencing the payment or receipt of money or property. 31 USC §3729(b)(4)

  33. Penalties *Not a requirement – can, in right circumstances, include ‘costs’ of investigation Actual damages* X 3 + $5-11K penalty per claim ($5,500- $11,000) + Agency debarment/exclusion INCENTIVE TO NOT DEFRAUD

  34. Statute Of Limitations Lawsuit must be filed within: • W/N 6 yrs of date of the eventgiving rise to the FCA claim, or • W/N 3 yrs of date material facts are known by law enforcement (agent or AUSA) • But in no event more than 10 yrsafter the date on which the violation(s) was committed. 31 USC § 3731(b)

  35. Qui Tam • Private Attorney General • Brought by private citizen in name of US • US is the real party-in-interest and remains a ‘party in interest.’ §3730(b)

  36. The Seal • Qui tam filed “under seal” (without knowledge or notice to Ds so Gov’t may investigate & elect to intervene. • Sealed for 60 days • Court may extend for good cause. • Time begins when both complaint & written disclosure served on Gov’t. 31 U.S.C. section 3730(b).

  37. Rights Of Parties US can intervene - In whole or in part. If intervene, Gov’t prosecutes 31 U.S.C. Section 3730(b)(4)(A). US declines to intervene Relator prosecutes the action 31 U.S.C. section 3730(b)(4)(A) US must consent to settlement or dismissal US still a party-in-interest. 31 U.S.C. section 3730(b).

  38. Relator Share If US intervenes 15-25% of Gov’t FCA recovery Attorneys’ fees and costs from D 31 U.S.C. section 3730(d)(1) If US declines 25-30% of FCA recovery Attys’ fees and costs from D 31 U.S.C. section 3730(d)(2) If relator “planner or initiator” of fraud, Court can reduce relator’s share 31 U.S.C. section 3730(d)(1)

  39. Kerry Kelly Deputy Criminal Chief Western District of Oklahoma

  40. Federal Procurement Fraud Criminal prosecution is the flip side of ACE. Similarities with ACE  Improve the integrity of the procurement process;  Deter and investigate fraud occurring within the system;  Recover misused tax dollars;  Improve public confidence in the government by demonstrating that individuals who engage in corrupt practices are brought to justice.

  41. Criminal Prosecution • Differences from ACE prosecution • Tools available to criminal prosecutor • Grand jury subpoena • Compelled attendance • Compelled production of documents • Title III federal wiretap • Search Warrants • Court approved access to federal tax returns • International venue

  42. False Claims Act • Dual Enforcement Under False Claims Act • An ACE civil prosecution can be brought against a person and/or corporation for a false claim AND • A criminal indictment for presentation of the same false claim • United States Supreme Court ruled that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the 5th Amendment only protects against multiple criminal prosecutions for the same offense.

  43. False Claims, 18 USC § 287 • Proof for 287 Violation • Making or presenting a false claim for payment against the United States • Claim was false, fictitious, or fraudulent • Knowledge of the falsity • Punishment • 5 years in prison • $250,000 fine

  44. False Claims Act, 18 USC § 287 • Claim can be made through a 3rd party • State or local government • Through another contractor • Through an insurance company • Through an individual (income tax preparer) • Claim does not have to be paid for a violation to have occurred.

  45. False Claims Act, 18 USC § 287 • Examples of false claim criminal convictions • Falsely submitting that medical procedures were supervised; • Submitting over-inflated labor and equipment charges • Falsely representing oneself as a licensed professional • Fabricating additional costs under equitable contract price adjustment order • Falsely certifying hiring of minority contractor

  46. Bribery, 18 USC § 201 • Prohibits giving or accepting • Anything of value to a public official • With the intent • To influence an official act OR • If it is received by the official, then in return for being influenced to either do an act or fail to do an act.

  47. Bribery, 18 USC § 201 • Bribery requires an express corrupt understanding between the private donor and the public officer • That a specific act will be performed or omitted in exchange for the payment. • A “quid pro quo”

  48. Bribery, 18 USC 201 • Crime of bribery is complete when an understanding is reached. It does not matter if • Payment actually was made. • The official bribed had authority to commit the act for which he was paid. • The official intended to do the act, for which he was paid. • Punishment • 15 years in prison

  49. Anti-Kickback Act, 41 USC §§ 51-58 • This statute is the “commercial” equivalent to bribery. • A contractor who is willing to pay a bribe to a government official to obtain a government contract may also be willing to demandoraccept a kickback from a subcontractor. • The purpose of the statute is to protect the integrity of government contracts and subcontracts for supplies, materials, equipment, or services of any kind.

  50. Anti-Kickback Act • What is a kickback? • Any money, fee, commission, credit, gift, gratuity, thing of value, or compensation of any kind. • Provided, directly or indirectly, to any prime contractor, prime contractor employee, subcontractor, or subcontractor employee • For the purpose of improperly obtaining or rewarding favorable treatment in connection with a prime contract or subcontract.

More Related