1 / 20

Simulating biomolecules

Simulating biomolecules. Steven O. Nielsen Department of Chemistry University of Texas at Dallas. Outline. Concept of the energy landscape funnel for protein folding Importance of low frequency normal modes of proteins Hydrophobic effect and cold unfolding Free energy.

kaden
Download Presentation

Simulating biomolecules

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Simulating biomolecules Steven O. Nielsen Department of Chemistry University of Texas at Dallas

  2. Outline • Concept of the energy landscape funnel for protein folding • Importance of low frequency normal modes of proteins • Hydrophobic effect and cold unfolding • Free energy Stress the link between thermodynamics and biomolecular structure

  3. Energy landscape theory: the protein folding funnel Protein folding should be complex. The classical view of protein folding is of a nearly sequential series of discrete intermediates. In contrast, the energy landscape theory of folding considers folding as the progressive organization of an ensemble of partially folded structures through which the protein passes on its way to the natively folded structure. As a result of evolution, proteins have a rugged funnel-like landscape biased toward the native structure. Jose Onuchic and Peter Wolynes (UCSD)

  4. Energy landscape theory: the protein folding funnel This organization (the funnel) is not characteristic of all polymers with any sequence of amino acids, but is a result of evolution. Evolution achieves robustness by selecting for sequences in which the interactions present in the functionally useful structure are not in conflict, as in a random heteropolymer, but instead are mutually supportive and cooperatively lead to a low-energy structure. Trade-off between entropy and enthalpy almost balance: why? Jose Onuchic and Peter Wolynes (UCSD)

  5. Energy landscape theory: the protein folding funnel THEORY / SIMULATION Perfect funnel or Go models include only interactions that stabilize the native structure. Very simple force field: only native contacts are favorable. This theoretical construct has yielded enormous insight into protein folding, even though it is highly simplified. Nobuhiro Go

  6. Normal mode analysis: low-frequency modes important for proteins Normal mode analysis (NMA) is a powerful tool for predicting the possible movements of a given macromolecule. It has been shown recently that half of the known protein movements can be modelled by using at most two low-frequency normal modes. Applications of NMA cover wide areas of structural biology, such as the study of protein conformational changes upon ligand binding, membrane channel opening and closure, potential movements of the ribosome,and viral capsid maturation. High frequency modes are usually localized – a bond stretch for example, and are not important. Low frequency modes are usually delocalized (eg. breathing modes) apo (left) and holo (right) forms of lactoferrin http://www.igs.cnrs-mrs.fr/elnemo/examples.html

  7. Hydrophobic effect D. Chandler, Nature, 417, 491 (2002). The separation of oil and water in ambient conditions is not due to repulsion between water and oil molecules, but to particularly favourable hydrogen bonding between water molecules. Strong mutual attractions between water molecules induce segregation of oil from water and result in an effective oil–oil attraction called the hydrophobic interaction: primary source of protein stability. But: depends on length scale

  8. Hydrophobic effect Water–water interactions persist even in the presence of small oily species, (< 10 carbon alkane). In the close vicinity of the oily molecules, the possible configurations of hydrogen bonding may be restricted, but the overall amount of hydrogen bonding remains unchanged. Thus, the cost of hydrating a small, hydrophobic solute has more to do with the number of ways in which hydrogen bonds can form than with their strength. That is, the solvation free energy of the system is largely entropic and not enthalpic. However, this geometric picture breaks down for an extended oily region, because not all hydrogen bonds can persist near to its surface. The nature of hydrophobicity therefore changes when the size of oily surfaces depletes the number of hydrogen bonds. This energetic effect — the loss of hydrogen bonding — drives the segregation of oil from water. (VOLUME vs SURFACE AREA: crossover on the nanometer scale)

  9. Hydrophobic effect D. Chandler, Nature, 417, 491 (2002). The assembly of hydrophobic structures requires the removal of water from regions between these groups; this is the same as vaporization. Hence, the closer water is to the liquid–vapour phase transition, the stronger is the tendency for hydrophobic assembly. I [Chandler] believe this explains why proteins are denatured by cold.

  10. Cold unfolding These (experimental) results demonstrate the potential of cold denaturation as a means to dissect the cooperative substructures of proteins and to provide a rigorous framework for testing statistical thermodynamic treatments of protein stability, dynamics, and function. -- Babu, Hilser, Wand, Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11 352 (2002) Usually have to go below the freezing temperature of water to see cold-unfolding, but there are experimental tricks to get as far down as -35oC and still have a liquid.

  11. Cold unfolding : thermodynamics temperature and pressure phase diagram

  12. Cold unfolding : thermodynamics Hawley theory: starts from the assumption that there are only two distinct states of the protein (native and denatured) and the transition between them is a two state process. The Gibbs free energy difference between these states is defined as: Upon integration of this equation from an arbitrarily chosen reference point T0,p0 to T,p we get: where D means the change of the corresponding parameter during denaturation (i.e. the value in the denatured state minus that in the native state).

  13. Cold unfolding : thermodynamics The transition line, where the protein denatures (or refolds depending on the direction of the crossing), is defined by DG=0. apo-myoglobin at 310K (left) and 278K (right). Water oxygens yellow.

  14. Free energy ( G = H – TS ) Free energy is the fundamental measure of macromolecular stability. For example, the relative free energy (Gibbs, G, constant temperature and pressure conditions) between the native and unfolded states of a protein is what is measured experimentally. Also might want to know the free energy barrier for a reaction (or in general for an event). This is one of the most important quantities to know in chemistry. Will give an example for events in biological membranes

  15. Biological membranes: packaging

  16. In its fight for resources, bacterium Staphylococcus aureus secretes alpha-hemolysin monomers that bind to the outer membrane of susceptible cells. Upon binding, the monomers oligomerize to form a water-filled transmembrane channel that facilitates uncontrolled permeation of water, ions, and small organic molecules. Rapid discharge of vital molecules, such as ATP, dissipation of the membrane potential and ionic gradients, and irreversible osmotic swelling leading to the cell wall rupture (lysis), can cause death of the host cell. This pore-forming property has been identified as a major mechanism by which protein toxins can damage cells.

  17. Study energetics (free energy) of water going through the pore: big entropy change and also big change in hydrogen bonding pattern, so both enthalpy and entropy must be considered Experimentally, a free energy difference is determined either from the relative probability of finding the system in a given state, or from the reversible work required to transform the system from one state to another.

  18. If an equilibrium simulation does not sample enough of the high free energy regions, a more powerful method is needed. One such method is the method of constraints, also called thermodynamic integration. Average force of constraint

  19. Free Energy Profile of Membrane Meniscus against Hydrophobic Mismatch Lipids do influence protein function—the hydrophobic matching hypothesis revisited (Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2004, 1666, 205) Xibing He, S.O. Nielsen, et. al., manuscript in preparation: first time this effect has been quantified by computer simulation k = 650 kJ/mol

  20. Synthetic antimicrobials aryl amide oligomers Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 43, 1158 (2004) Shai-Matsuzaki-Huang

More Related