NSLS-II

1. NSLS-II JPSI NSLS UEC August 17, 2006 Housing

2. The Mission Need for NSLS-II • Major studies by BESAC, BES, and the National Nanotechnology Initiative have reassessed the research and the scientific tools needed to advance energy technologies. • A common conclusion is that the development of nanoscale materials – as well as the methods to characterize, manipulate and assemble them – is critical for the development of future energy technologies. • The remarkable tools that were developed over the past 30 years for visualizing the nanoworld – in particular, the synchrotron radiation light sources – helped launch the nanorevolution; ; however, none of today’s light sources (anywhere in the world) were designed to probe materials with 1 nanometer spatial resolution and with 0.1 meV energy resolution (equivalent to ~1 K). “Light sources with even more advanced capabilities than the best available today are needed to address the challenges put forward in these and other reports.”

3. High Level Description of NSLS-II • A highly optimized x-ray synchrotron delivering: • extremely high brightness and flux; • exceptional beam stability; and • a suite of advanced instruments, optics, and detectors that capitalize on these special capabilities. Five of the highest brightness beamlines will be instrumented as part of the project. • Together, these enable: • ~ 1 nm spatial resolution, • ~ 0.1 meV energy resolution, and • single atom sensitivity.

4. NSLS-II Scope Storage Ring • 3 GeV, 500 mA w/ Top-off Injection • Emittance (ex, ey) ~ 0.6 nm, 0.007 nm • Brightness ~ several x 1021 p/s/0.1%/mm2/mrad2 • Flux ~ 1016 p/s/0.1% • Beam Size (sx, sy) ~ 40 mm, 4 mm • Beam Stability ~ 10% sx,y Beamlines • Five insertion device beamlines included in project scope Conventional Facilities • Improvements to Land • Buildings: Ring plus Admin and Lab/Office Modules • Utilities • Standard Equipment

5. Milestone Schedule

6. Recent Activities • Lattice and Accelerator Configuration Review – May 11-12 • DOE Review – May 16 • Cost Review – June 13 • Acquisition Strategy Workshop – June 20-21 • DOE Review – July 18 • Acquisition Strategy submitted • CDR A/E on board and A/E held several programming meetings • Special site studies completed (Geotechnical, RFI, Vibration) • Awarded contract for constructability review & indep. cost estimate for conventional facilities • Completed detailed cost estimate & refined project WBS • Completed first draft of most sections of the CDR. No technical show stoppers. • Environmental Assessment completed; under review by NYS and Suffolk Co. • Establishing NSLS-II advisory committees

7. Contributors to CDR James Ablett, Rudy Alforque, Marc Allaire, Dario Arena, Alfred Baron, Ron Beauman, Johan Bengtson, Lonny Berman, Wayne Betts, Scot Buda, Clement Burns, Larry Carr, Bob Casey, Mark Chance, Barrett Clay, Scott Coburn, Leo Dalesio, Roger Dejus, Bob Delasio, Steve Dierker, Elaine DiMasi, Mike Dudley, Ken Evans-Lutterodt, Marty Fallier, Rick Felter, Conrad Foerster, George Ganetis, Thomas Gog, Diane Hatton, Richard Heese, John Hill, Chris Homes, Hsiao-chaun Hesuh, Steve Hulbert, Chris Jacobsen, PK Job, Erik Johnson, Peter Johnson, Chi-Chang Kao, Stephen Kramer, Sam Krinsky, Tony Kuczewski, Jef Landgraf, Jerome Lauret, Vladimir Litvinenko, Yun Luo, Zhongchi Luo, Jorg Maser, Richard Michta, Lisa Miller, Mark Miller, Simon Mochrie, Christoph Montag, Paul Montanez, Christie Nelson, Paul Northrup, Payman Mortazavi, Satoshi Ozaki, Igor Pinayev, Boris Podobedov, Dennis Poshka, George Rakowsky, Mohan Ramanathan, Harald Reichart, Ian Robinson, Kathleen Robinson, Jim Rose, Cecilia Sanchez-Hanke, Alec Sandy, Dieter Schneider, Timur Shaftan, Sushil Sharma, Qun Shen, Yuzhen Shen, Wuxian Shi, Deming Shu, Yuri Shvyd’ko, Peter Siddons, Nick Simios, John Skaritka, Ivan So, Peter Stephens, Vivian Stojanoff, Robert Sweet , Peter Takacs vToshi Tanabe, Elio Vescovo, Joe Woicik, Lin Yang, Jim Yeck, Zhijian Yin, Li Hua Yu, Zhong Zhong, Pete Zuhoski

8. NSLS-II Visitors (since Jan 1) Suzanne Herron (ORNL) Ray Johnson (ORNL) Carl Strawbridge (ORNL) Judy Trimble (ORNL) Dong Wang (MIT) Ivan Bazarov (Cornell) Jerry Hands (Sandia) Georg Hofstaetter (Cornell) Barry Miller (Consultant) Sushil Sharma (ANL) Defa Wang (MIT) Fuhua Wang (MIT) Karl Bane (SLAC) Michael Borland (ANL) Yong-Chul Chae (ANL) Louis Emery (ANL) PK Job (ANL) Gregory Portmann (LBNL) Kem Robinson (LBNL) Yuri Shvyd’ko (ANL) Jim Yeck (U. Wisconsin-Madison) Simon Mochrie (Yale) Alfred Baron (SPring8) Andrea Baron (LLNL) Alex Lumpkin (ANL) Ryutaro Nagaoka (SOLEIL) Ruben Reininger (Consultant) Ian Robinson (University College) Qun Shen (APS) Anatoly Snigirev (ESRF) Christoph Steier (LBNL) Gennady Stupakov (SLAC) Gode Westefeld (BESSY) Carlo Bocchetta (ELETTRA) Michael Boege (SLS) Max Cornaccia (SSRL) Mikael Eriksson (MAXLAB) Jorg Maser (APS) Mohan Ramanathan (APS) Hal Amick (HDR) Bob Dalesio (SLAC) Roger Dejus (ANL) Oliver Hignette (ESRF) Mark Jamison (HDR) Tom Kasmam (HDR) • Kevin McCullough (Washington Group ) • Alex Sandy (MIT) • Christian Schroer (Ins. Strukturphysik) • Amad Soueid (HDR) • Lou Vitaly (HDR) • Al Walker (HDR) • Bob Barnes (Zander) • Robert Bove (Zander) • Thomas Gog (ANL) • WY Lee (Indiana University) • David Robin (LBL) • Brian Rusthoven (ANL) • Werner Joho (PSI) • Ferdinand Willeke (DESY) • Frank DePaola (APS) • Steve Damico (Jacobs) • Vincent Mangeri (Jacobs) • Daniel Quinn (Jacobs) • Vishy Ravindranath (APS) • Om Singh (APS) • Nathan Towne (Consultant) • Hanspeter Vogel (ACCEL) • Marc Tricard (QED Technologies)

9. Optimized Design • 30 Cell DBA Lattice • 15 straights of 5 m length and 15 straights of 8 m length • Fifteen 5 m straights and five 8 m straights available for user undulators • Eight 8 m straights used for Damping Wigglers • Three DWs would be varied to counter changes in user undulators in order to keep emittance, brightness, and beam size constant • Five DWs would be fixed and available as excellent sources of user radiation • One 8 m straight used for injection and one 8 m straight used for RF • Total of 20 undulators and 5 damping wigglers for user program • IR provided by BMs • Total Circumference ~ 780 m • Bare emittance ~ 2.1 nm, Emittance with damping wigglers ~0.6 nm • Estimated Total Project Cost ~ $762M

10. Storage Ring Parameters

11. NSLS-II Brightness

12. NSLS-II Flux

13. Brightness – NSLS-II Wigglers & BMs compared to NSLS VUV & X-ray BMs

14. Flux – NSLS-II Wigglers & BMs compared to NSLS VUV & X-ray BMs

15. Infrared Extraction of IR from Bending Magnets is feasible with good performance

16. Conventional Facilities • 30 Sectors • 25 straights for user insertion devices • 30 bending magnet ports for bending magnet beamlines • Each beamline is up to 60 m long • Accomodation for some long Insertion Device beamline extensions • 5 Lab/Office Buildings (LOB) at 11,000 sf each • Each LOB has 30 offices and shared 5 labs (6 offices and 1 lab per sector) • 6 Service Mechanical Equipment Room (MER) Buildings • Five at 8,000 sf each • One at 4,000 sf (associated with Linac/RF BLDG)

17. Facility Site Plan

18. Building Exterior Concept - Aerial View Facing Southeast

19. Building Exterior Concept – Typical Lab Office Building

20. Overall Building Floor Plan

21. Building Sections

22. Central Lab/Office Building(CLOB)

23. Lab Office Buildings (LOBs) • Each LOB has an outside entrance and parking lot to accommodate 40 cars • Each lab has access to the Experimental Hall through double doors • Each LOB has 22 closed office, 8 open offices, informal interaction space, and a conf. room • Each LOB has five shared labs (24 ft x 20 ft) – mix of wet labs w/ fume hood and dry labs • LOBs will be configured to allow for future expansion • Each LOB will have a loading area and a gas bottle storage area

24. Schematic NSLS-II Beamline Layout The majority of the beamlines will fit comfortably within the main ring building Lab Office Building (LOB) Provision is being made for the possibility of some long beamlines extending outside the main ring building

25. Multiple ID Beamlines per Straight Section Example: GM/CA-CAT at APS Two beamlines, both tunable, could operate simultaneously and view canted undulators in a single straight section. Tandem deflecting mirrors could kick one of the undulator beams outward.

26. NSLS-II Beamlines • 15 five m straights for user undulators • Could drive up to 30 beamlines by canting two undulators • 5 eight m straights for user undulators • Could drive up to 15 beamlines by canting three undulators • 5 eight m straights for user damping wigglers • Could drive up to 15 beamlines by canting three DWs • 30 BM ports • 10 BM ports dedicated for IR • 5 large aperture for far-IR • 5 regular aperture for mid/near-IR At least 55 beamlines Up to 90 beamlines w/ maximum IDs per straight Multiple hutches/beamline are also possible

27. Current Operational Beamlines at NSLS • IR/UV/Soft X-ray Spectroscopy (10) • U1A, U4B, U5UA, U7A, U9B, U11, U12A, U12IR, U13UB, X13A • X-ray Spectroscopy (9) • X9B, X10C, X11A, X11B, X15B, X18B, X19A, X23A2, X23B • Soft Matter/Biophysics Scattering (8) • X6B, X10A, X10B, X19C, X22A, X22B, X27C, X28C • Hard Matter/Strongly Correlated Scattering (8) • X1B, X5A, X17B1, X20A, X20B, X20C, X21, X22C • Powder/Single Crystal/High Pressure/Optics (11) • U2A, U3C, X3B1, X7A, X7B, X8A, X14A, X17B2, X17B3, X17C, X24C • Imaging and Microprobe (9) • U2B, U10A, U10B, X1A, X2B, X13B, X15A, X26A, X27A • Macromolecular Crystallography (10) • X4A, X4C, X6A, X8C, X9A, X12B, X12C, X25, X26C, X29 X-ray 49 VUV/IR 16 Total 65

28. Mechanism for Beamline Development • Spallation Neutron Source and Linear Coherent Light Source model • Coordinate users to define scientific case and instrumentation specifications for each beamline • Users and/or facility submit proposals to funding agencies • Facility constructs and operates the beamlines • Partner user • Research resources and others funded by NIH and NSF • Industrial research • Others • Beamline Advisory Teams • Work with facility to define scientific mission and technical requirements for beamline • Facility receives funding to design, construct, and operate beamlines • Beamline Development Teams • Work with facility to define scientific mission and technical requirements for beamline • Users receive funding to design, construct, and operate beamline

29. NSLS-II Beamline Approval Criteria • Scientific merit • Projection of potential user demand • User and scientific community Input • Projection of technical progress • Optics, Detectors, Automation, Computing • Current NSLS beamline distribution and usage • Experience at other facilities

30. NSLS-II Advisory Committees • Committees are being established; nominations are invited for membership • Will hold first meeting of each committee in Sep/Oct • Project Advisory Committee (PAC) • Advise on matters related to scientific mission, strategic planning, user access, construction planning, project management, technical performance, and safety, with the goals of maximizing the scientific impact of NSLS-II Thom Mason, Chair (SNS) Wayne Hendrickson (COLUMBIA) Gerhard Materlik (DIAMOND) Gopal Shenoy (APS) Bill Stirling (ESRF) • Accelerator Systems Advisory Committee (ASAC) • Advise on technical choices, trade-offs, and decisions; value engineering; measures to improve availability and reliability of operations; diagnostics and controls Pascal Elleaume, Chair (ESRF) John Galayda (SLAC) Lia Merminga (JLAB) Dieter Einfeld (CELLS) Albin Wrulich (PSI/SLS) ASAC Chair, ex officio EFAC Chair, ex officio CFAC Chair, ex officio David Rubin (CORNELL) Carlo Bocchetta (ELETTRA/FERMI) Glenn Decker (APS)

31. NSLS-II Advisory Committees • Experimental Facilities Advisory Committee (EFAC) • Advise on the development of the beamlines and instruments for NSLS-II and their optimization to deliver the maximum benefit to the users. Assist in forming the Beamline Advisory Teams (BATs) and Beamline Development Teams (BDTs), and generally provide direction to the formation of the experimental facilities at NSLS-II. Simon Mochrie (YALE) Paul Dumas (SOLEIL) Gene Ice (ORNL) • Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee (CFAC) • Advise on the development of the improvements to land, conventional construction, and utilities systems required to deliver the maximum benefit to the users. Jerry Hands, Chair (ret. LANL) Joe Harkins (LBNL) Karen Hellman (ANL) Ian Robinson (UCL/DIAMOND) Francesco Sette (ESRF) • Marvin Kirshenbaum (ANL) • Jack Stellern (ORNL) • James Sanford (ret. BNL)

32. Transitioning OperationsFrom NSLS to NSLS-II • Continue operations of NSLS until NSLS-II operational • Move NSLS programs to NSLS-II • Overlap operations while programs transfer over (< 1 year) • NSLS and NSLS-II staff merge to operate NSLS-II • Present NSLS Building Renovated for Other BNL Programs • Expect to develop transition plan starting in FY07

33. Summary • Baseline scope established which meets performance and cost goals • Conceptual Design and cost/schedule estimates progressing well • We are on track to deliver CDR and other documents in early October and to hold a successful Lehman review in November • We welcome your continuing input