Building a WIM Data Archive for Improved Modeling, Design, and Rating
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 49

Building a WIM Data Archive for Improved Modeling, Design, and Rating PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 63 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Building a WIM Data Archive for Improved Modeling, Design, and Rating. Christopher Monsere Assistant Professor, Portland State University Andrew Nichols Assistant Professor, Marshall University. NATMEC 2008, Washington, D.C. August 6, 2008. Outline. Data Almanac PORTAL

Download Presentation

Building a WIM Data Archive for Improved Modeling, Design, and Rating

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Building a wim data archive for improved modeling design and rating

Building a WIM Data Archive for Improved Modeling, Design, and Rating

Christopher Monsere Assistant Professor, Portland State University

Andrew Nichols Assistant Professor, Marshall University

NATMEC 2008, Washington, D.C. August 6, 2008


Outline

Outline

  • Data Almanac

  • PORTAL

  • WIM Archive Quality Control

  • Sample Uses of the WIM Archive

    • Sensor Health and Calibration

    • Uses for LFR and MPDEG

    • System Performance and Information

    • Planning Data


Data almanac

Describe the data source

DATA almanac


Data almanac1

Data Almanac

  • 22 reporting WIM sites

    • All upstream of weigh stations

    • All are CVISN sites

    • April 2005 - March 2008

      • 2007 - 12,054,552 trucks

    • Intermittent data outages and problems

    • Data quality and accuracy?


Data almanac2

Data Almanac

  • These WIM sites provide

    • Axle weights

    • Gross vehicle weight

    • Spacing

    • Vehicle class

    • Unique transponder numbers


Axle weight sensors

Axle Weight Sensors

  • Single load cells

  • Sensors weigh vehicles traveling at normal highway speeds

  • Weight measurement affected by many factors

    • Site characteristics

    • Environmental factors

    • Truck dynamics


Wim layout

WIM Layout

Trucks Bypass

R.F. Antenna

1 mile

Notification

Station

(in-cab)

High Speed

Tracking

System

WIM Sorting Site

Ramp

(with Overhead AVI)

Static

Sorter

Weighing

System


Sorting lanes

Sorting Lanes

Exit Lane

Weigh Lane

  • WIM installed on entrance ramp to determine if vehicle is close to legal weight

  • Legal trucks directed to exit facility without being weighed statically


Indiana wim site layout

Indiana WIM Site Layout

  • Loops – vehicle presence & speed measurement

  • Load Cell – weight & speed

  • Piezo – speed & axle spacing

Inductive

Loop

Piezo

Sensor

Load Cell

Sensor

Inductive

Loop


Wim classification algorithm

WIM Classification Algorithm

  • Portion related to 5-axle vehicles shown

  • Works like a sieve

  • Min/Max thresholds for

    • # of axles

    • axle spacing

    • axle weight

    • gvw

  • Currently only use axle spacing


Electronic screening

PrePass

NORPASS

State operated/developed; compatible with NORPASS

Electronic screening

J. Lane, Briefing to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 22 February 2008

freight.transportation.org/doc/hwy/dc08/scoht_cvisn.ppt

  • Three types of tags

    • Heavy Vehicle Electronic License Plate (HELP)’s PrePass program

    • North American Pre-clearance and Safety System (NORPASS)

    • Oregon Green Light Program

  • All RF tags


Portal 101

What is PORTAL PORTAL - Postgresql database

PORTAL 101


Quality control

Describe Quality Control Metrics

QUALITY CONTROL


Outline1

Outline

  • Summarize Existing Quality Control Metrics

    • Speed Accuracy

    • Weight Accuracy

  • System-Wide Monitoring vs. Site-based Monitoring

    • SQL ServerExtract Pivot Tables (.CUB)

  • Move Beyond Heuristic (sometimes visual) Rules to a Statistically Solid Decision Making Criteria

    • Learn from Manufacturing World of Statistical Process Control


Data quality assessment

Data Quality Assessment

  • Obtain data from WIM sites (nightly or weekly)

  • Upload individual records to SQL database

  • Macroscopic view to identify potential problems

  • Microscopic view to investigate causes

    • Differentiate between problems & random noise using statistical process control (individual lanes)

  • Schedule maintenance/calibration accordingly


Past quality control hurdles

Past Quality Control Hurdles

  • Emerging WIM quality control metrics

  • Enormous amounts of data

  • Many vendors’ standard reports do not provide level of detail necessary for effective quality control, particularly comparing multiple sites

  • Most DOTs do not have time or resources to perform QA/QC


Accuracy metrics illustrated

Accuracy Metrics Illustrated

  • Vehicle Classification

  • Axle Spacing

    • Speed

  • Axle Weight

    • Wheel weight

Accuracy Metric

Accuracy Metric


Speed accuracy metric

Speed Accuracy Metric

  • Class 9 drive tandem axle spacing

  • Currently used by many agencies

  • Target values based on manufacturer sales data

    • Individual trucks 4.25-4.58 feet

    • Population average 4.30-4.36 feet


2002 sales data

2002 Sales Data

  • Data obtained from 3 of top 6 truck manufacturers

  • Verified at Indiana WIM sites with accurate speed calibration

Weighted Average = 4.33 feet

Modal Value (0.01)’ would be even better than average


Wim speed control chart

WIM Speed Control Chart

  • Class 9 Drive Tandem Axle Spacing

  • Limits based on sales data and data from sites with good calibration

  • Limits same for all sites

    • Upper Control Limit (UCL) = 4.36 feet

    • Centerline (CL)= 4.33 feet

    • Lower Control Limit (LCL) = 4.30 feet


Speed axle spacing

Speed & Axle Spacing

  • WIM calculates speed by measuring vehicle time between two sensors

  • WIM speed used to calculate axle spacing based on time between consecutive axles

Calibration factor


Speed accuracy importance

Speed Accuracy Importance

  • Used to calculate axle spacing

    • Vehicle classification

    • Bridge formula compliance for enforcement

  • Used to apply weight calibration factors in some WIM systems


Why unclassified

Why Unclassified?

  • All axle spacings in this lane were overestimated by ~15%

  • The axle spacing 3-4 is exceeding the defined thresholds in the vehicle classification file (40’ max)

Axle 3-4 Spacing

30-35 feet typical


Weight accuracy metric

Weight Accuracy Metric

  • Class 9 front axle weight

    • Individual trucks 8,000-12,000 lbs

    • Population average 9,000-11,000 lbs

  • Currently used by many agencies

  • This range is too big for detecting subtle drifts


Class 9 wim accuracy metrics

Class 9 WIM Accuracy Metrics

  • Steer Axle Weight

    • 8.5 kips (GVW < 32 kips)

    • 9.3 kips (GVW 32-70 kips)

    • 10.4 kips (GVW > 70 kips)

  • Steer Axle Weight and Axle 1-2 Spacing

    • Logarithmic relationship

    • Steer Axle Weight/Axle 1-2 Spacing

  • Steer Axle Wheel Weight

  • Gross Vehicle Weight Distribution

    • 28-32 kips unloaded

    • 70-80 kips loaded


Dahlin s gvw criteria

Dahlin’s GVW Criteria

3rd Peak?


Class 9 gvw distribution

Class 9 GVW Distribution

  • Modal distributions

  • Look for peak mode shifts

  • Trend identification difficult

  • Very difficult to automate (QC)

    • Step function to find max GVW bins

    • Bin width affects precision


Mixture models

Mixture Models

  • Fitting a continuous function to GVW distribution – combination of normal distributions

  • Use algorithm to fit “mixture” of normal distributions

    • Obtain mean and covariance for each component


Gvw fit 1 component

GVW Fit – 1 Component

Mean 1 = 56 kips

Covariance 1 = 310 kips

Proportion 1=100%


Gvw fit 2 components

GVW Fit – 2 Components

Mean 1 = 74 kips

Covariance 1 = 11 kips

Mean 2= 48 kips

Covariance 2=222 kips

Proportion 1=33%

Proportion 2=67%


Gvw fit 3 components

GVW Fit – 3 Components

Mean 1 = 75 kips

Covariance 1 = 9 kips

Mean 2= 52 kips

Covariance 2=193 kips

Mean 3=30 kips

Covariance 3=11 kips

Proportion 1=31%

Proportion 2=57%

Proportion 3 =12%


Wim speed axle spacing accuracy

WIM Speed/Axle Spacing Accuracy

  • Common speed accuracy metric isClass 9 drive tandem axle spacing

  • No consensus on proper values

  • Verified with manufacturer sales numbers

    • Individual trucks 4.25-4.58 feet

    • Population average 4.30-4.36 feet


Sensor health

Describe from Quality Control Metrics About Sensor Health

SENSOR HEALTH


Lfr and mpdeg

Describe Higgins Work

LFR and MPDEG


System performance

Describe Sample PMs

System performance


Freight performance metrics

Freight performance metrics

  • Average travel times on key corridors

  • Ton-miles on each corridor by various temporal considerations

  • Overweight vehicles on corridors by temporal variation (measuring change)

  • Seasonal variability in loading, routes, and volumes

  • Percent trucks with tags on each corridor

  • Origin-destination matrix


Freight performance metrics1

Freight performance metrics


Freight performance metrics2

Freight performance metrics

Using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) / American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) proprietary truck satellite data.


Building a wim data archive for improved modeling design and rating

Wyeth

Emigrant Hill

Farewell Bend


Next steps

Next Steps


Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

Dave McKane and Dave Fifer, ODOT

Kristin Tufte and Heba Alawakiel, PSU


  • Login