Distributed solar transactions nem and beyond mec conference october 2013
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 19

Distributed Solar Transactions: NEM and Beyond MEC Conference October 2013 PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Distributed Solar Transactions: NEM and Beyond MEC Conference October 2013. About SEPA. Educational 501(c)3 non-profit. 430+ Utilities. 52% of electricity customers. Formed by utilities for utilities 20 years of service Balanced perspective

Download Presentation

Distributed Solar Transactions: NEM and Beyond MEC Conference October 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Distributed solar transactions nem and beyond mec conference october 2013

Distributed Solar Transactions:

NEM and Beyond

MEC Conference

October 2013

About sepa

About SEPA

Educational 501(c)3 non-profit



52% of electricity customers

  • Formed by utilities for utilities

  • 20 years of service

  • Balanced perspective

  • Research, education, collaboration and advisory services


solar stakeholders


of installed solar capacity


Aligning solar and utilities sampling of 340 utility members

Aligning Solar and UtilitiesSampling of 340 Utility Members

Role of dg in top 10 solar states

Role of DG in Top 10 Solar States

Critical dg issues

Critical DG Issues

  • Grid integration

    • Distribution grid operational concerns – safety, reliability, operations, and grid management

  • Customer expectations

    • Satisfaction tied to the experience of “going solar”

    • Customers now perceive “choice” in electricity source

  • Business impacts of net metering

    • Revenue loss

    • Rate inequity, upward rate pressure

    • Obscured subsidies/lack of transparency

Net metering what s the issue

Net Metering: What’s the Issue?

Is net metering in and of itself the problem?

Or is it net metering in combination with how rates are currently designed?

Sepa position on nem

SEPA Position on NEM

  • Customer-sited solar generation will play an increasingly important role in the energy mix for utilities and consumers.

  • NEM policies promote the deployment of customer-sited distributed solar generation in many markets.

  • However, NEM and rate design, inherently linked, need to evolve to transparently allocate costs and benefits, compensating all parties for their value contribution.

  • This transition will only be effective when utilities, the solar industry and customers collaborate to create a sustainable solar distributed generation marketplace.

Financial impacts of nem timing dictates impacts on shareholders customers

Financial Impacts of NEMTiming dictates impacts on shareholders & customers

Impact on shareholders

(Between rate cases)


Revenue Requirement

Not Collected



Impact on non-solar ratepayer

(Post-rate case)



Impact redistributed

to ratepayers

Total Annual


  • Variable Costs:

  • Operating costs saved after solar installation

  • Fuel and potentially O&M

  • Fixed Costs:

  • Costs previously incurred in deploying utility infrastructure

  • Generation, T&D, etc.

  • Total Annual Incentive:

  • Sum of Production-based incentive payments

  • Revenue Requirement:

  • Authorized returns

  • Tax and depreciation

  • Operations and Maintenance

Ratemaking and nem

Ratemaking and NEM

Not Typically Impacted


For more information, see SEPA’s “Ratemaking, Solar Value and Solar Net Energy Metering – a Primer” (July 2013)

Rate design alternatives

Rate Design Alternatives

Demand based vs volumetric

Demand-Based vs. Volumetric

Demand-based Rate Design

(Typical Non-Residential)

Volumetric Rate Design

(Typical Residential)

NEM Transaction

Value of solar overview solar fit clean contract etc

Value of Solar OverviewSolar FiT, Clean Contract, etc.

The Value of Solar (VOS) transaction is based on a rate, reflecting the benefits and costs of distributed PV resources, which is offered to customers in exchange for PV output

Attributes of the VOS transaction model

  • Rate is established through a transparent and repeatable analysis, potentially annually

  • Customer continues to pay their full retail rate based on consumption

  • PV systems are interconnected on the “utility side” of the meter

  • PV system production is individually monitored

  • Customers are compensated based on system production and the VOS rate

  • Market analysis is used to establish incentives to facilitate PV market above and beyond the VOS (if necessary)

  • Incentive program design demonstrates support, with established declines, if necessary

  • VOS sends appropriate market signals

  • VOS can be established for the system as a whole, or it can be designed to send specific locational signals

  • Maintain simplicity for both communications and transaction administration

  • Retains conservation signal for customer

Value of solar components

Value of Solar Components

Value analysis and period similar valuations presented differently

Value Analysis and PeriodSimilar valuations presented differently

CPS Energy – VOS Study

Source: T. Hoff et al, “The Value of Distributed Photovoltaics to Austin Energy and the City of Austin”; March 17, 2006

Importance of program design

Importance of Program Design

Calculating a Value of Solar is only the first step

Pitfalls of stakeholder processes

Pitfalls of Stakeholder Processes

  • Stakeholder perception that outcomes have been predetermined, with stakeholder process used only to justify results

  • Talking “at” stakeholders rather than discussing “with” stakeholders

  • Positive components of the plan getting overshadowed by items stakeholders disagree with

Stakeholder engagement plan communicate the end objective first

Stakeholder Engagement PlanCommunicate the End Objective FIRST

  • Clearly articulate to stakeholders what the end objective of the process will be

    • Ex 1: a viable and transparent solar transaction that supports XYZ Utility’s goals, keeps costs down for distributors, and creates a functioning solar market

    • Ex 2: review of VOS compared to current program (retail rate +incentive until 2016), with determination if a change needs to occur

  • Lay out at the beginning what the stakeholder process will look like, how feedback/suggestions will get incorporated, and what will happen with the stakeholder process ends

Stakeholder engagement plan identify players roles and outline process

Stakeholder Engagement PlanIdentify players/roles, and outline process

Level of Engagement

Phases of Process

Distributed solar transactions nem and beyond mec conference october 2013

Contact Information

Julia Hamm

President & CEO


[email protected]

Eran Mahrer

EVP, Strategy & Research


[email protected]

  • Login