Disinfectant disinfection byproducts control and optimization
Download
1 / 30

Disinfectant Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 353 Views
  • Updated On :

Disinfectant & Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization. Case Study of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Water System. By Johnny Mendez, P.E., Drinking Water Program Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. Prepared in Cooperation with Ben Stacy, WTP Supervisor,

Related searches for Disinfectant Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Disinfectant Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization' - jud


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Disinfectant disinfection byproducts control and optimization l.jpg

Disinfectant & Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization

Case Study of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Water System

By Johnny Mendez, P.E.,

Drinking Water Program

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation

Prepared in Cooperation with Ben Stacy, WTP Supervisor,

University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Note: The D/DBP optimization and control concepts being presented here have been adapted from a ADEC training workshop in Fairbanks, AK Feb 26-Mar 1, 2007. The workshop was developed by Mr. Larry DeMers, PE of Process Applications Inc.


Disinfectant vs dbp balance l.jpg
Disinfectant vs. DBP balance Optimization

  • Optimized disinfection at WTP and Distribution System improves barrier against microbial pathogens

    BUT….

  • (Cl or O3)+ Organics  DBPs (TTHM, HAA5, Bromate)

  • The challenge is to balance these competing goals


Dbp health effects l.jpg
DBP Health effects Optimization

  • Suspected Carcinogens

  • Suspected to affect reproduction

  • Large population exposure to DBPs

  • Other potential DBPs health effects have not been fully researched


Optimization goals for disinfection dbp control l.jpg
Optimization goals for Disinfection & DBP Control Optimization

  • Methodology developed from CPE concepts used at media filtration WTPs.

    • Optimization goals

    • Use of special studies (scientific method)

  • Process Applications Inc. and EPA effort.

  • Basis for Optimization Goals:

    • Public health protection

    • Safety factor for achieving compliance

    • Provide means to measure improvements


D dbp optimization goals l.jpg
D/DBP Optimization Goals Optimization

  • TOC Performance Goals:

    • (% TOC removed/% removal required)=1.1 (10% safety factor)

    • Finished water TOC concentration= goal WTP specific

  • Disinfection Goals:

    • Maintain sufficient inactivation CT (safety factor is system specific)

    • Maintain minimum distribution system residual:

      • Free Chlorine ≥ 0.2 mg/l

      • Total Chlorine = system specific (suggest >0.5 mg/L)

  • DPB Goals:

    • Individual site LRAA: TTHM≤ 80 ppb; HAA5 ≤ 60 ppb

    • Long Term System Goal (based on 11 quarter average of Max LRAAs): TTHM≤ 60 ppb; HAA5 ≤ 40 ppb


D dbp optimization tools l.jpg
D/DBP Optimization Tools Optimization

  • Historical Cl2 and CT Spreadsheet

    • WTP Cl dose, Cl residual, and CT assessment

  • Historical Chlorine Residual Performance Spreadsheet

    • assess historical Cl residual trends for WTP effluent and distribution system

  • Historical TOC performance Spreadsheet

    • assess WTP TOC removal performance

  • Historical DBP Performance

    • Assessment of historical DBP performance vs. new optimization goals


Develop a wq baseline and monitoring plan l.jpg
Develop a WQ Baseline and Monitoring Plan Optimization

  • Before changes in the water system are implemented a water quality baseline is needed to:

    • Understand historical system performance in light of optimization goals

    • Help fine tune/set optimization goals

    • Have a basis of comparison for measuring improvements in DPB control

    • Anticipate and prepare for potential secondary impacts

  • A monitoring plan will help in the systematic and efficient collection of data for the baseline.


Developing a baseline l.jpg
Developing a Baseline Optimization

  • Select which relevant WQ parameters to monitor (i.e. TOC, Alkalinity, CT, TTHM).

  • Some parameters may already be available, but frequency may need to be modified.

  • Consider use of surrogate parameters for ease of data collection & cost savings (e.g. TOC and DBP surrogates)


Surrogates for dbp related data l.jpg
Surrogates for DBP related data Optimization

  • Developing a DBP control strategy may require increased TOC and DBP data. This can increase cost and complexity of data collection

  • Tools exist to enhance TOC and DBP data quantity by using alternative field methods that are faster and less costly


Field toc methods l.jpg
Field TOC Methods Optimization

  • UV absorbance at 254 nm:

    • Uses spectrophotometer

    • Samples need to be filtered

    • Requires development of relationship b/w UV254 and TOC

    • Best for water samples before Cl addition

  • Field TOC method (HACH®):

    • Uses reagents and spectrophotometer

    • Issues with accuracy & precision

  • Portable TOC analyzer (GE):

    • costly equipment (~ $15K)

    • Easy to use and calibrate


Toc and uv 254 relationship l.jpg
TOC and UV Optimization254 Relationship

7.0

6.0

5.0

R2=0.89

4.0

TOC (mg/L)

3.0

Y=34X+0.98

2.0

1.0

0.0

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

UV Absorbance at 254 nm (1/cm)


Field dbp methods l.jpg
Field DBP Methods Optimization

  • Cl residual Decay

    • Simple, can be done by all WTP operators

    • Cl residual is used as surrogate for DBP formation

    • Relationship may change through the year due to WQ and temp. changes


Field dbp methods cont l.jpg
Field DBP Methods (cont.) Optimization

  • THM Plus™ ( HACH®)

    • Uses spectrophotometer and 4 reagents

    • Measures 4 THM species plus other trihalogenated DBPs:

      • Chloroform

      • Bromodichloromethane

      • Dibromochloromethane

      • Bromoform

      • Trichloroacetic acid, plus other HAAs, & Chloral Hydrate.

    • Results can be obtained in 1-2 hrs.

    • Paired sampling needed to develop relationship b/w field and analytical values.

    • Cost ~$5 to $10 per sample once equipment purchased

    • Spectrophotometer cost ~$3000 (DR2800) to $6000 (DR5000)


Thm plus method l.jpg
THM-Plus Method Optimization

  • HACH® Method 10132

  • The method can be run on any Hach DR 5000, DR 2800, DR 4000, DR 3000, DR 2400, DR 2010, or DR 2000 Spectrophotometer

  • Results Measured at 515 nm

  • Results reported as ppb chloroform

  • Range 0-600 ppb

  • Sensitivity ~10 ppb

  • Precision= 66 ppb (95% confidence range= 53 ppb-79 ppb)


Creating a monitoring plan l.jpg
Creating a Monitoring Plan Optimization

  • Develop objective for the monitoring

  • Answer sampling specifics (what, where, how, who, frequency)

  • Suggested min. monitoring:

    • TOC & DBPs (including surrogates)-> monthly

    • Disinfectant residuals at WTP->Daily

    • Disinfectant Residuals in Distribution->Weekly


What next what to do with all this data l.jpg
What Next: Optimizationwhat to do With All this Data?

  • Create Graphs to see trends

  • Make list of issues/sites to focus on

  • Develop relationships with surrogate parameters to help in process control

  • Develop DBP control strategies for testing


Developing a dbp control strategy l.jpg
Developing a DBP Control Strategy Optimization

  • Operations-based change that will lower DBPs

  • Use “Special Studies” approach

    • Hypothesis, Methods/Resources, Experimental Design, Results/Conclusions, implementation

  • Take small steps

  • Pay attention to secondary impacts

  • Develop implementation strategy

    • Use data to sell idea to management

    • Think of scale (Seasonal/Year-round?, WTP/Distribution?)


Dbp control strategies examples l.jpg
DBP Control Strategies--Examples: Optimization

  • Lowering TOC

  • Optimize Chlorine Use (pre-chlorination, intermediate, & post chlorination)

  • Optimize Process pH

    • Higher pH (>8.5) higher TTHM formation Potential

    • Lower pH (<6.5) higher HAA formation potential

  • Reduce water age


University of alaska fairbanks uaf l.jpg

University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Optimization

Case Study



Uaf water system facts l.jpg
UAF Water System Facts Optimization

  • Population: 3600 Non-Transient, 1400 Resident

  • 2600 acre campus (230 acres developed)

  • Design Capacity= 1 MGD; Typically runs < 0.5 MGD (350 gpm)

  • Source: Ground water wells (3 wells)

    • High Iron 15 mg/l

    • High Mn 1.5 mg/l

    • High TOC~13 mg/l

  • Treatment:

    • Objective: Fe & Mn & Organics removal (Benzene)

    • Pre-Oxidation (Permanganate)

    • High Rate Aeration,

    • Coagulation: Nalco 7768 Anionic Polymer & 8185 PAC polymer,

    • Flocculation: 2-Stages, 20 min to 2 hrs detention time

  • -- Arsenic45ppb

    -- pH 7 to 8

    -- Alkalinity~310-350 mg/L


    Uaf water system facts cont l.jpg
    UAF Water System Facts (cont.) Optimization

    • Treatment (cont.):

      • Sedimentation: 300 Tube Settlers, (settled water turbidity ~1.0-3.0NTU)

      • multi-media filtration: Anthracite, Sand, Gravel (turbidity ~.05-.07 NTU)

      • GAC (10 filters, run 5 at time)

      • Corrosion inhibitor (zinc sulfate),

      • Storage (1.5 MGal),

      • Chlorination (MIOX Sal-80): Target entry point Cl residual ~1.5 ppm.

    • Distribution:

      • ~ 6-miles of pipe

      • Parallel fire protection and domestic water mains

      • Mainly 8” and 10” diameter DI Pipes

      • Water pipes in utilidor shared by steam lines

      • ~100 service connections

      • Highest Water Temp ~72oF


    Slide23 l.jpg

    UAF Optimization


    Slide24 l.jpg

    WTP Optimization

    O’ Neill

    IARC

    Elvey

    Student Housing

    Nat.

    Science

    Museum

    Arctic

    Health

    Wood

    Center

    Library

    Gruening

    Brooks

    Ag-Farm

    Duckering

    Eielson

    Bunnell

    Commons

    University of Alaska Fairbanks

    Distribution System

    Physical

    Plant

    Power Plant

    • Notes:

    • Not to Scale,

    • Simplified Diagram; not all service connections or branches shown

    • Water mains are mostly 8-in. diameter. Some sections are 10-in.


    Uaf dbp study strategy l.jpg
    UAF DBP Study Strategy Optimization

    • Cl data

    • TOC data

    • Develop Cl Map in Distribution

    • Collect CL residual

    • Collect THM Plus data

    • Collect TTHM data and HAA5


    Historical data l.jpg
    Historical data Optimization

    • TOC

    • CL

    • DBP


    Latest developments l.jpg
    Latest Developments Optimization

    • THM-Plus data


    What next l.jpg
    What Next? Optimization

    • Select Stage 2 sites

    • IDSE

    • Treatment changes:

    • Coagulation enhancement

    • Carbon Filter Special Study?

    • Membrane system?


    Sources l.jpg
    Sources Optimization

    • ADEC D/DBP Training February 26, 2007. Larry DeMers, Process Applications Inc., Ft. Collins, CO.

    • UAF Water Distribution Condition Survey. PDC, Inc. Consulting Engineers; Project 2001110CWS, Final Report. November 2001.

    • ADEC SDWIS Database


    Questions l.jpg
    Questions? Optimization


    ad