1 / 8

Pre-insolvency Rehabilitation: Ukraine's Progress with NPL Resolution Framework

Gain insights into Ukraine's pre-insolvency rehabilitation procedures and their effectiveness in resolving non-performing loans. Discover the proposed draft law and its key features for successful pre-insolvency restructuring. Join the panel discussion with experts in the field.

jstillman
Download Presentation

Pre-insolvency Rehabilitation: Ukraine's Progress with NPL Resolution Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IFI’s Perspective on Ukraine’s Progress with NPL Resolution Framework Session 1Insolvency procedure as a catalyst for wider use of OOCR and NPL resolutionPre-insolvency Rehabilitation under Article 6 of the Bankruptcy Law 26 April 2018Kyiv, Ukraine

  2. Pre-insolvency procedures “Pre-insolvency proceedings can be characterized as quasi-collective proceedings under the supervision of a court or an administrative authority which give a debtor in financial difficulties the opportunity to restructure at pre-insolvency stage and to avoid the commencement of insolvency proceedings in the traditional sense.” European Commission, 2014.

  3. Article 6 and best practice principles • Law 8060 – proposed draft would completely replace Article 6 with a new pre-bankruptcy rehabilitation procedure • Procedure meets the requires for pre-insolvency procedure outlined in EU Recommendations on Business Failure (2014) and Regulation 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings. Standard features include: • flexible access requirements for financially distressed, viable businesses; • debtor maintains control over day-to-day operation of its business; • temporary moratorium imposed at the outset, or the debtor should be allowed to request one immediately following submission of the petition; • pre-application rules ensuring a fair voting process. • a restructuring plan adopted by a suitable majority of creditors by each class binding on all creditors if confirmed by a court; and • bankruptcy safeguards to protect interim or new financing from challenges by creditors in the event of a subsequent bankruptcy

  4. Key Features: Pre-Trial Rehabilitation (1) • Classic “pre-packaged plan” with “pre-approval” requirement • Debtor Initiates • Automatic moratorium on acceptance of application until plan approval • Plan must stipulate claims to be restructured, repayment terms, and measures • Classification – claims can be grouped based on similar claims • Liquidation analysis – mandatory to accompany plan • Financial analysis – confirming debtor’s ability to repay (not mandatory but) • Majority: secured = 66.6% majority (down from 100%); unsecured = simple • Plan approval – not a basis for default on contracts (i.e., no ipso facto defaults) • Rehabilitation manager – selected by debtor or creditors holding more than 50% secured amount (excluding interested parties), plan condition

  5. Key Features: Pre-Trial Rehabilitation (2) • Approved plan binds minority, dissenting and holdout creditors • Opposing secured creditors bound to majority, but collateral rights intact • State claims – bound to accept same treatment as unsecured creditors • Tax claims – older than 3 years not recoverable or written off under plan • Claims excluded – 1st and 2nd priority claims; claims not to be restructured • Court’s role is limited, largely to confirming plan approval requirements • No conversion to liquidation if the plan is not approved • Swift (10-40 days) • Amending BL Art. 6 makes procedure available to all debtors

  6. Key Features: PTR vs LFR LFR procedure • Administrative process/contractual • Debtor remains in control • Access: 50% of financial inst. debt • Eligibility: financially distress viable • Moratorium on commencement (limited – involved creditor/assets) • Plan finalized/voted after • Fully consensual (2/3 arbitration) • Binds only creditors in plan • Up to 180 days • Independent expert verifies Pre-trial Rehabilitation • Court supervised process/court order • Debtor remains in control • Access: no debt threshholds • Eligibility: all debtors • Moratorium on application (broader and can apply to all creditors) • Plan finalized, voted, approved before • Majority approved (66.6%/50%) • Binds all creditors covered by plan • 10-40 days • Court checks process only/limited role • Direct path from consensual restructuring process => Kyiv Appellate Court • LFR benefits (taxes and safeguards) extend to PTR proceedings

  7. LFR – BL Art. 6 flow chart Coordination Secretariat Administration Notice of application Notice of agreement or termination 90 days 90 days Court Enforcement Voluntary Restructuring Due Diligence Standstill or Moratorium Plan Preparation Negotiation Extended Negotiations Notice of moratorium Commence Application Accepted Bankruptcy suspension Process Terminated No No 100% Agreement Process Concluded > 66% Arbitration Committee yes Execution Agreement yes Full Consent Restructuring Agreement Kyiv Appellate Comm. Court Requisite Majority < 100% creditor acceptance Pretrial Rehabilitation (Court) (10-40 days) Art. 6 Law on Bankruptcy

  8. Proposed Bankruptcy Law Article 6 procedure for pre-insolvency rehabilitation(panel discussion) Moderator: Gordon W. Johnson, President, EMA Global Panellists: • Alexander Biryukov, Professor, Commercial Law, Univ. of Kyiv • OlenaPolyakova, Bankruptcy & Restructuring Counsel, Redcliffe • Steven Franck, CRO, Innovation Brain and Director, Hellenic Financial Stability Fund

More Related