Download

The Service Encounter Triad






Advertisement
/ 18 []
Download Presentation
Comments
joylyn
From:
|  
(618) |   (0) |   (0)
Views: 506 | Added: 06-03-2012
Rate Presentation: 1 0
Description:
The Service Encounter Triad. Service Organization. Efficiency versus autonomy. Efficiency versus satisfaction. Customer. Contact Personnel. Perceived control. More Repeat Purchases. More Familiarity with Customer Needs and Ways of Meeting Them.
The Service Encounter Triad

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only and may not be sold or licensed nor shared on other sites. SlideServe reserves the right to change this policy at anytime. While downloading, If for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.











- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Slide 1

The Service Encounter Triad

Service

Organization

Efficiency

versus

autonomy

Efficiency

versus

satisfaction

Customer

Contact

Personnel

Perceived

control

Slide 2

More

Repeat

Purchases

More Familiarity with Customer Needs andWays of Meeting Them

Stronger Tendency to Complain about Service Errors

Greater Opportunity for Recovery

from Errors

Higher Employee

Satisfaction

Higher Productivity

Lower Costs

Better Results

Improved Quality

of Service

Satisfaction Mirror

Higher Customer Satisfaction

Slide 3

The Cycle of Capability

  • Careful employee and customer selection

  • High-quality training

  • Well-designed support systems

  • Greater latitude to meet customer’s needs

  • Clear limits on expectations of employees

  • Appropriate rewards and recognition

  • Satisfied employees

  • Employee referrals of job candidates

Slide 4

Service Profit Chain

Internal

External

Service concept

Operating strategy and

service delivery system

Target market

Loyalty

Revenue

growth

Customers

Satisfaction

Productivity

&

Output

quality

Service

value

Employees

Satisfaction

Loyalty

Capability

Profitability

Service

quality

Workplace design

Job design / decision-making latitude

Selection and development

Rewards and recognition

Information and communication

Adequate “tools” to serve customers

Quality & productivity improvements yield higher service quality and lower cost

Attractive Value

Service designed

& delivered to

meet targeted

customers’ needs

Lifetime value

Retention

Repeat Business

Referral

Slide 5

Through the Looking Glass: An Agency Theoretic Foundation for the Satisfaction Mirror

Ellis, R. S. Gudergan, S. P. and Johnson, L. W. (2001), Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and complaining behavior, 14, pp. 121-124.

Slide 6

Outline

  • Abstract

  • Introduction

  • Agency Theory and the Customer-Staff Dyad

  • Moral Hazard

  • Imperfect Information and Asymmetry

  • A Second Dyad

  • Propositions

  • Implications

Slide 7

Abstract

  • Authors identify the front-line service provider as being the agent in two separate but related principal-agent dyads: the first with the customer, the second with the employing organization.

  • The role in two simultaneous dyads, with on conditional on the other, both provides direction fro strengthening the satisfaction mirror and also places upper limits on its potential strength.

Slide 8

Introduction(1)

  • “Satisfaction mirror” as a strong positive relationship between customer satisfaction and staff job satisfaction within the service environment.

  • Wile the satisfaction mirror is intuitively appealing – the idea that a customer’s satisfaction of the front-line service provider, and vice versa – a theoretical analysis of the underlying mechanics of the mirror has not been undertaken.

Slide 9

Introduction(2)

  • In this paper, the authors utilize agency theoretic concepts to understand underlying driving forces that can shape and limit the satisfaction mirror.

  • Additionally, the authors apply agency theory to develop testable propositions regarding the mirror.

Slide 10

Agency Theory and the Customer-Staff Dyad (1)

  • The customer (principal) requires the service provider (agent) to perform some service on the customer’s behalf – the classical principal agent problem.

Slide 11

Agency Theory and the Customer-Staff Dyad (2)

  • The customer expects from the service provider a specific outcome to the customer’s service requirement, said outcome to be the service resolution:

  • If there is a problem, the customer expects it to be fixed; if there is an opportunity, the customer expects it to be taken.

Slide 12

Moral Hazard(1)

  • The problem of moral hazard arises when the customer believes that adequate delivery by the service provider is uncertain because of possible lack of effort and therefore that working with the service provider is risky.

  • While optimal levels of satisfaction for both the customer and service provider cannot therefore be simultaneously achieved, the opportunity still exists for efficiency gains – or increases in satisfaction – to be achieved by one or both parties.

Slide 13

Moral Hazard(2)

Slide 14

Imperfect Information and Asymmetry(1)

  • Context-specific imperfect information results because the customer alone has intimate knowledge of the environment in which the need for service was originally identified as well as the symptoms that are necessary for service task diagnosis, and yet it is the service provider who requires that information.

Slide 15

Imperfect Information and Asymmetry(2)

  • Here, the design of the implicit or explicit arrangement will determine the overall level of front-line service provider satisfaction with the customer relationship.

Slide 16

A Second Dyad

  • The service provider is also involved in a second dyad, this one with the organization that employs the individual. As with the staff-customer dyad, the two parties in the staff-organization dyad are presumed to be efficiency maximizers.

Slide 17

Propositions(1)

  • Proposition 1: A greater customer satisfaction focus in the contract the organization has with each service-providing staff member will strengthen the satisfaction mirror.

  • Proposition 2: The more risk-averse a frontline service staff member, the weaker the positive effect on the satisfaction mirror of a customer-satisfaction-focused [i.e., outcome-based] contract between staff member and organization.

Slide 18

Propositions(2)

  • Proposition 3: A greater customer service focus [i.e., behavior basis] in the contract the organization has with each risk-averse service-providing staff member will strengthen the satisfaction mirror.

  • Proposition 4: Given a behavior-based customer-service-focused contract between organization and staff member, the greater the member of outcomes the organization desires from the staff member, the weaker the satisfaction mirror will be.


Copyright © 2014 SlideServe. All rights reserved | Powered By DigitalOfficePro