1 / 14

Download data versus traditional impact metrics :

Download data versus traditional impact metrics : Measuring impact in a sample of biomedical doctoral dissertations Urban Andersson, Jonas Gilbert, Karin Henning Gothenburg University Library Gothenburg, Sweden. Gothenburg University Library. Digital Services electronic publishing

joyce
Download Presentation

Download data versus traditional impact metrics :

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Download data versus traditional impact metrics: Measuring impact in a sample of biomedical doctoral dissertations Urban Andersson, Jonas Gilbert, Karin Henning Gothenburg University Library Gothenburg, Sweden

  2. Gothenburg University Library Digital Services electronic publishing e-journals and e-books databases web site development IT development

  3. Gothenburg University Library Bibliometric Services indicators for resource allocation science mapping collaboration and network analyses citation and performance analyses collection development

  4. Download data versus traditional impact metrics

  5. Are the different methods complementary or correlating? • How to develop methods to measure the relationship?

  6. The case – ”Best doctoral thesis”!

  7. Compilation thesis Comprehensive summary (50-100 pages) + 3-6 papers

  8. Pdf-file for the thesis (comprehensive summary) stored in local repository. Link to published article at external publishers site.

  9. Citation data from ISI Web of Science Field normalized citation scores Example: Endocrinology Article 2007 20 citations World average 10 citations Field normalized citations score 20/10 = 2 ”Times cited”

  10. Analyzing the data

  11. Lack of correlation between citations and downloads

  12. Additional relationships • Correlation between peer judgement and citations • Correlation between PR activities and downloads/views

  13. Summary • Providing diverse data (both downloads and citations) • Visibility • Enhancement of methods

  14. Thanks for your attention! Urban.Andersson@ub.gu.se Jonas.Gilbert@ub.gu.se Karin.Henning@ub.gu.se

More Related