1 / 26

Compulsory Class Attendance

Compulsory Class Attendance. Marena Lotriet 22 July 2009 Faculty of Humanities: HOD Meeting. Concern. “If only they attended classes!!!” Discussion on low pass rates, 8 June - HODs and relevant lecturers Numerous informally raised concerns UP-wide

joubert
Download Presentation

Compulsory Class Attendance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Compulsory Class Attendance Marena Lotriet 22 July 2009 Faculty of Humanities: HOD Meeting

  2. Concern “If only they attended classes!!!” • Discussion on low pass rates, 8 June - HODs and relevant lecturers • Numerous informally raised concerns UP-wide • Also internationally (Wimshurst, et. al. 2006:141)

  3. Request • Dean requested short presentation on the topic at this meeting • Informed decisions and plan of action

  4. Problem • Not a policy issue: UP policy exists (Senate decision, 18 April 2007 - S6554/07) • Spelt out in faculty year book (point 2.2) BUT • No sanction specified for those who do not attend • No effective and fair system to monitor class attendance

  5. Practical ConsiderationsWhat physical monitoring system to put in place? • Class lists • cheapest, but least effective • signatures can be faked • administrative nightmare – especially in large classes

  6. Practical Considerations (Cont.) • Classtests • educationally sound • enforces preparation • Logistical nightmare in large classes

  7. Practical Considerations (Cont.) • Student card system • less open to fraud • can be linked to class lists • expensive • longer term

  8. Practical Considerations (Cont.) • Fingerprint recognition • probably most reliable • can be linked to class lists (hopefully centrally) • expensive • longer term • will have to put in a request to IT

  9. Important Decisions • When to monitor? • Every contact session? • Probably the fairest • What constitutes “acceptable class attendance”? • 50%? • 80%? • More? • Does this include practical sessions? • Separate system for practical sessions?

  10. Important Decisions (Cont.) • What happens when a student does not attend enough classes? • Exam refusal? • In combination with semester mark? E.g. 30% attendance, but semester mark of 70% (OBE) • Marks deducted after x absences (x% per lecture)?(Rodgers,2002) • 100% attendance = 5% extra to semester mark

  11. Important Decisions (Cont.) • Are there cases of merit (death/illness)? • Who handles those cases? • What are acceptable documentation?

  12. And in the Meantime? • Incentives for class participation • Unannounced quizzes that contribute to final grade

  13. Implications • To understand the huge implications for: • UP; • the faculty and • individual lecturers… ...we need to look at research done in this regard.

  14. Relationship: Class Attendance and Academic Performance • “Absenteeism adversely affects” performance (Rodgers, 2002 – own findings and also referring to American studies) • Independant of incentive/sanction schemes • Attendance per se does not ensure that learning takes place (presence ≠ engagement) • Still unclear why students skip classes “and how they utilise the time so gained” (Rodgers, 2002)

  15. Relationship: Class Attendance and Performance (cont.) • Nonlinear: • missing a few classes - really a problem • missing more than four - significant lower performance (Durden & Ellis, 1995)

  16. Reasons for Absenteeism • Absenteeism internationally widespread and substantial • Lecturers often feel that students are the reason: that they are not responsible • Many reasons specified in literature:…

  17. Reasons for Absenteeism (Cont.) • Higher in: • large classes • classes with non-mathematical content • core subjects (compulsory) • experienced academic staff (as opposed to ‘casual lecturers’) (Romer, 1993)

  18. Reasons for Absenteeism (Cont.) • Attendance positively related to: • ability and motivation of student • students financing own studies through work • classes taught by lecturers who won teaching awards • classes taught by interactive teaching style • classes scheduled between 10:00 and 15:00 (Devadoss & Foltz, 1996)

  19. Reasons for Absenteeism (Cont.) • UP-case • Assessment (memorisation required) • Studying for semester tests more important (curriculum and workload issue) • Practical sessions extending into lecture time • Teaching methods and difference in learning styles (Pickworth, 2005 - UP)

  20. Reasons for Absenteeism (Cont.) • UP-case (cont.) • Lecturers not turning up/not prepared for lectures • Communication gap between staff and students • Lectures too early (e.g. transport problems) • Can get information from friends, or read textbook (no real value-add beyond transfer of knowledge) (Pickworth, 2005 - UP)

  21. “Case Against Compulsory Class Attendance” • Differing views • Research has not consistently revealed a positive relationship between attendance and performance • Conclusions from different research cases: • Some students can learn independently • No one intervention will work for all • Explanation of correlation enough – no policy needed • Numerous variables influencing achievement • Poor performance: cause or effect? • Research does not provide enough justification to make attendance compulsory • Course grades should reflect competence in course content – not personality traits (St Clair, 1999)

  22. “Case Against Compulsory Class Attendance” (Cont.) • Pintrich’s model or motivation in the college classroom: Academic motivation in the classroom = interaction among: • Classroom context • Student’s emotions and motivational beliefs: • Belief about one’s ability to perform a task • Value or importance • Affect/feelings about self or behaviour • guilt, shame, or anxiety ---- frustration, anger • Student’s observable behaviours (choices to do or not to do) • (St Clair, 1999)

  23. Implications • Huge responsibility on UP i.t.o.: • Physical environment(media, enough space, etc.) • Time table clashes • Smaller class sizes • Synchronising periods of high assessment activities • Optimised acad. environment (quality teaching, learning and assessment, curriculum and programme design – including the way that clickUP is used) • Clear value add during contact sessions(beyond transfer) • Truthfulness to the reasons we want them to attendclass(e.g. belief that it will improve thinking skills/academic competencies - lectures should cater for these) • Legal implications • Enrolment implications

  24. Implications • Clear Faculty decisions • Consequent application throughout • Clear communication to students • Research implied

  25. Class attendance is a complex and multidimentional phenomenon and cannot be simplified to one element only. (EI after Bosman, 2006)

  26. References Department for Education Innovation. 2007. Discussion document: class attendance. S6551/07. University of Pretoria. Devadoss, S. & Foltz, J. 1996. Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agriultural Economics, vol. 78:499-507. Durden, G.C. and Ellis, L.V. 1995. The effects of attendance on student learning in principles of economics. American Economic Review, vol. 85: 343-346. Pickworth, G.E. et.al. 2005. The Dilemma of Student attendance of Learning Opportunities. SADJ, 20(2), March 2005:101. Rodgers, J.R., 2002. Encouraging tutorial attendance at university did not improve performance. Australian Economic Papers. September 2002. Blackwell Publishing Ltd/University of Adelaide and Flinders University of South Australia. Romer, D. 1993. Do Students Go to Class? Should They?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 7: 167-174. St. Clair, K.L. 1999. A case against compulsory class attendance policies in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 23(3), Spring 1999: 171-180. Wimshurst, K. et. al. 2006. The impact of institutional factors on student academic results: implications for ‘quality’ in universities. HERDSA, 25(2): 131-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360600610370, accessed on 15 July 2009.

More Related