1 / 21

Readjusting Project Dynamics for a Successful Outcome

Readjusting Project Dynamics for a Successful Outcome. Dan Williams Director, Project Consulting April 2012. Averting Disaster. We’ve all been involved with a project that was in trouble. How do you fix it? Where do you start? How do you avoid disaster?. Why you S hould Care.

josie
Download Presentation

Readjusting Project Dynamics for a Successful Outcome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Readjusting Project Dynamics for a Successful Outcome Dan Williams Director, Project Consulting April 2012

  2. Averting Disaster We’ve all been involved with a project that was in trouble. • How do you fix it? • Where do you start? • How do you avoid disaster?

  3. Why you Should Care • We should be involved in QA, not just testing • We are sometimes the only advocate for the customer • We need to recognize that QA is integral to the larger project ecosystem • We must be solution oriented not focused on the problem • Having a “global” view will enhance your career path

  4. The Project • The project was implementing a new enterprise management tool integrated with several third party vendors and customized to meet our specific business needs. • The PM lost stakeholder support and confidence; placing the project in danger • Issues were many, including:

  5. Issues • Incomplete and missing requirements • Assumptions rather than facts • Incomplete notes from meetings • No follow-up with stakeholders • Requirements gathering excluded entire groups • Incorrect, incomplete and unclear data mapping • Lack of information architecture • Requirements based on incorrect premises • What do you want, not what do you need • Copy of what was already in place • Effort not boxed

  6. Issues Part 2 • No Formal Test Plan • Migration testing: spot checking by PM and one developer • Integration testing (smoke test at cutover) • Third-party functionality – spot checking by stakeholders • Functionality testing – developers, self-directed UAT • Pick up the pieces after conversion • No vendor coordination • Project behind schedule • Negative earned value • Documentation and training duties assigned • Unclear expectations • Poor knowledge transfer • Reporting was an afterthought

  7. Issues Part 3 • Project manager • Didn’t listen • Talked over people • Ignored stakeholder concerns • Antagonistic relationship with coworkers • Insulated team from stakeholders, SMEs, and vendors • Little to no interaction • All project knowledge centered in PM • Development team didn’t understand priorities • Stakeholders didn’t have good feel for project status • Fragmented team – portion of team working on unproductive tasks

  8. What Determines Whether a Project will be Successful? What do you think of your team’s execution? “I’m in favor of it!” John Mckay Tampa Bay Bucs Coach 1976

  9. Project Success / Challenge Factors Project Success % ofFactors Responses User Involvement 15.9% Executive Management 13.9%Support Clear Statement of 13.0%Requirements Proper Planning 9.6% Realistic Expectations 8.2% Smaller Project Milestones 7.7% Competent Staff 7.2% Ownership 5.3% Clear Vision & Objectives 2.9% Hard-Working, 2.4%Focused Staff Project Challenge % ofFactors Responses Lack of User Input 12.8% Incomplete Requirements 12.3%& Specifications Changing Requirements 11.8%& Specifications Lack of Executive Support 7.5% Technology Incompetence 7.0% Lack of Resources 6.4% Unrealistic Expectations 5.9% Unclear Objectives 5.3% Unrealistic Time Frames 4.3% New Technology 3.7% Chaos Report – Standish Group

  10. Project Success / Challenge Factors Project Success % ofFactors Responses User Involvement 15.9% Executive Management 13.9%Support Clear Statement of 13.0%Requirements Proper Planning 9.6% Realistic Expectations 8.2% Smaller Project Milestones 7.7% Competent Staff 7.2% Ownership 5.3% Clear Vision & Objectives 2.9% Hard-Working, 2.4% Focused Staff Project Challenge % ofFactors Responses Lack of User Input 12.8% Incomplete Requirements 12.3%& Specifications Changing Requirements 11.8%& Specifications Lack of Executive Support 7.5% Technology Incompetence 7.0% Lack of Resources 6.4% Unrealistic Expectations 5.9% Unclear Objectives 5.3% Unrealistic Time Frames 4.3% New Technology 3.7% Chaos Report – Standish Group

  11. Open the lines of Communication • Engage the stakeholders • Make them part of the team • Develop project excitement • Clearly communicate project news • Newsletter • Updated schedule • Generate support and excitement • Be open and realistic about project status

  12. Baseline the Project • Assess current progress and risks • Identify known gaps • Identify areas needing further investigation • Prioritize areas and tasks

  13. Divide and Conquer • Assign area owners with clear, measurable objectives • Collaborate • Coordinate • Report • Follow-through

  14. Go Back to the Beginning • Gather/Reaffirm/Clarify requirements • Rebuild trust with Stakeholders • Keep meetings focused and effective • They need to know their time and opinions matter • They need to know they are heard • They must know you care • Point out the results of their input • Replace faces where necessary

  15. Triage and Scheduling • Triage • Evaluate critical path and overall timeline • Evaluate dependencies – especially external • Label items for sign-off, hot-fix, and future • Push out or eliminate unnecessary items • Adjust schedule if necessary • Communicate schedule issues immediately • Do it once, do it right

  16. Get to Work • Prepare the team for tough work • Plan for a regular schedule but be ready to do what is necessary • 80/20 rule • Focus efforts on key areas that provide the most value • Deal with the rest as time permits • Involve users in testing and acceptance • Recognize time criticality of efforts • What is required for signoff • What can be done after code freeze • What can be a hot fix

  17. Win Them Over with Support • Be there • Be knowledgeable • Be responsive • Be good

  18. Allow for Future Phases • Deal with cut/delayed functionality • Align with proper requirements • Adjust for stakeholder/user misrepresentation of needs • Bug fixes

  19. Project Recovery Summary • Open lines of communication • Assess Risks • Prioritize • Divide and conquer • Rebuild trust • Go back to the beginning (requirements) • Triage Cut/push out non-essential areas • Adjust schedule if necessary • 80/20 rule • Schedule work according to priority • Work, work, work • Be prepared with strong support and resolve issues quickly • Allow for additional phases

  20. Questions

  21. Contact Information Dan Williams Director of Project Consulting Main 425-974-6345 Cell 425-577-1192 daniel.williams@compucom.com

More Related