1 / 15

Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009

Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009. Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process. Phase 1 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound. Actors: PSAT, Ecology, DoH, U.S.EPA Money: U.S. EPA NEP Grant $135,000 Goal: Identify greatest toxic threats

joshwa
Download Presentation

Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Toxics Loading Studies2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process

  2. Phase 1 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound Actors: PSAT, Ecology, DoH, U.S.EPA Money: U.S. EPA NEP Grant $135,000 Goal: Identify greatest toxic threats Obtain credible results Develop strategy for action

  3. Phase 1 Outcomes Show first PSP results Broad participation Initial sketch of known/unknown

  4. Phase 2 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound Ecology: “What next?” Springtime money: U.S. EPA $300K Ecology TCP $300K NOAA $ 55K No formal process for prioritization

  5. Phase 2 Projects Foci: Some of the sidelined pathways Fill gaps More details for pathways of greater threat Leads: Ecology U.S. EPA WDFW NOAA Eight Projects: One abandoned One scope changed

  6. Phase 2 Outcomes To-Date Roadways & Surface Runoff Wastewater Dischargers Assess Sediment to Biota Transfer Ocean Boundary Support Human Health Risk Assessment Box Model Develop Toxics Biological Observing System

  7. Phase 3 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound • Ecology & PSP: “What next?” • Intentions: • Align with Action Agenda • (not yet written) • Keep momentum • U.S. EPA wants funding • to drive actions

  8. Phase 3 Projects • 17 Proposed Projects • 11 Received Funding (2 only for half) • 1 Project Split; 1 Project Merged • Plus 1 Project Funded by WA Legislature • U.S. EPA 2008 NEP Grant $1,983,800 • U.S. EPA $ 30,000 • U.S. EPA (NOAA / USFWS) $ 475,000 • Washington Legislature (PSP) $ 310,000 • Project Leads: Ecology U.S. EPA WDFW • NOAA U.S. FWS

  9. Phase 3 Year 2 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound • Inter-Agency SC: “What next?” • Action Agenda for guidance • Remainder of U.S. EPA 2008 NEP Grant • PSP needs inventory of toxic chemical sources by Spring 2010

  10. Potential Phase 3 Year 2 Projects • Only 3 to 6 projects may be funded • Proposals due to U.S. EPA March 1 • Proposed projects: • Continuing Year 1 projects (2) • Link Sources to Sound / Synthesis / Education (3) • Air Deposition (2) • Stormwater (2) • Groundwater (2) • Bioaccumulation • Others

  11. Toxics Loading Hand-Off • From Various Agencies • To PSP Science Panel • Phase 3 Year 2 decision process will probably still be “pragmatic.” • Decision process for potential Oct 2009 funding is to be more formal and rely on recommendations of PSP Science Panel.

  12. Relationships 2/11/2009

  13. Possible Future Relationships

  14. James M. Maroncelli Washington Department of Ecology JaMM461@ecy.wa.gov 360-407-6588 Toxics Loading Project Website – http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/pstoxics/index.html

More Related