Thanks to our sponsor
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 39

Thanks to our sponsor PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 54 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Thanks to our sponsor. M. Aller (UM) R. Bender (Munich) G. Bower (NOAO) A. Dressler (OCIW) S. Faber (UCSC) A. Filippenko (UCB) K. Gebhardt (Texas) R.Green (NOAO) L. Ho (OCIW). T. Lauer (NOAO) J. Kormendy (Texas) J. Magorrian (C U) J. Pinkney (Michigan) D. Richstone (Mich)

Download Presentation

Thanks to our sponsor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Thanks to our sponsor

Thanks to our sponsor


Thanks to our sponsor

M. Aller (UM)

R. Bender (Munich)

G. Bower (NOAO)

A. Dressler (OCIW)

S. Faber (UCSC)

A. Filippenko (UCB)

K. Gebhardt (Texas)

R.Green (NOAO)

L. Ho (OCIW)

  • T. Lauer (NOAO)

  • J. Kormendy (Texas)

  • J. Magorrian (C U)

  • J. Pinkney (Michigan)

  • D. Richstone (Mich)

  • C. Siopis (Mich)

  • S. Tremaine (Princeton)


3c175

3c175


Weighing planets stars galaxies or black holes

Weighing planets, stars, galaxies or black holes

vcirc = aGM/r

a depends on the orbit


Kepler

Kepler


Thanks to our sponsor

M84


Orbit superposition schwarzschild s method

Orbit Superposition (Schwarzschild’s method)

  • Assume a mass distribution.

  • Compute the gravitational forces.

  • Follow all the orbits.

  • Sum the orbits to match the observed velocities.

  • Failure rules out the mass distribution.


Thanks to our sponsor

The current demographic picture


Results of 15 year effort

Results of 15 year effort

  • Most bulges have BH (97% so far).

  • BH mass tracks main-body parameters

    (L, ).


Second parameter

Second parameter?


Thanks to our sponsor

  • Bulge M/L ~ 3x10-3h

  • Density

    - 2.5x105 Msun/Mpc³ for h=.65 (Yu & Tremaine)

    - 4.8x105h² Msun/Mpc³ (Aller & Richstone)

  • consistent results from different datasets.

  • S = 2.2x105 Msun/Mpc3

    - 6 – 9x105 (Fabian & Iwasawa) qso+X-ray background (and similar from Barger).


Big problem

?BIG PROBLEM?

The X-ray background energy exceeds the available sources of energy in known supermassive black holes.

(the known population of SBH seems just adequate for the quasar energy).


A note on backgrounds

A note on backgrounds

  • Any background can be expressed in terms of the cosmic microwave background energy density (about 1eV/cm3).

  • uqso ~ 10-4

  • bh ~ uqso-1(1 -  -gw – ejections)

  • ustars ~ 1


What should theorists learn from the observations

What should theorists learn from the observations?

  • BH can accrete stars, gas, degenerate objects, dark matter; only gas accretion yields the correct Soltan number.

  • Most BH growth has occurred during the quasar epoch. Is this also the epoch of bulge formation? Of major mergers?

  • How does BH growth connect to galaxy formation and evolution?


Collapse vs mergers

Collapse vs mergers


Ideas for the m s 4 relation in the context of collapse or evolution

Ideas for the M-s4 relation in the context of collapse or evolution

  • The bh growth is limited by a mass budget - competition w/ star formation(Burkert & Silk).

  • BH growth limited by energy conservation (Silk & Rees, Blandford, A.R.King). Ciotti & Ostriker, pure core collapse).

  • The bh growth is limited by a momentum budget (Fabian)

  • BH growth is limited by angular-momentum (AGR).


Feedback versus initial conditions

Feedback versus initial conditions

  • Most feedback models are likely to eject material only in certain directions (for example, bubble break-out along direction of fastest density gradient).

  • Condition dependent models are fragile against changes in the environment.


Antennae

Antennae


Thanks to our sponsor

  • Any initial formation mechanisim evolves through the merger hierarchy (investigated through SAMs by Haehnelt & Kaufman).

  • BH merge or form binaries, triples, etc.

    • Ejections? The “last parsec” problem?

    • The dispersion of the M- relation is an important clue.


Lisa sky

LISA sky


Grav waves

Grav waves.


Implications

Implications

  • BH growth spurt during quasar era (is this the epoch of bulge formation?).

    • What is the pedigree of BH and galaxies?

  • M- relation is a powerful clue.

  • Co-Evolution! --- feeding, bar disruption, core scouring, mergers --- bh growh connected to galaxy evolution.


Cognitive style of powerpoint

Cognitive style of powerpoint


  • Login