1 / 18

Minnesota Handwriting Assessment

Minnesota Handwriting Assessment . Jeffrey Arnold & Morgan Vaughan . Key Characteristics . Purpose To quantify selected aspects of young student’s handwriting Used to support or reject teachers subjective judgment of poor quality or slow rate handwriting in students Age

joshua
Download Presentation

Minnesota Handwriting Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Minnesota Handwriting Assessment Jeffrey Arnold & Morgan Vaughan

  2. Key Characteristics • Purpose • To quantify selected aspects of young student’s handwriting • Used to support or reject teachers subjective judgment of poor quality or slow rate handwriting in students • Age • Second semester 1st graders and 2nd graders

  3. Frame of Reference most likely used guiding selection of this tool • Biomechanical • Developmental • PEO

  4. Bottom-Up Approach

  5. Test Development and Standardization • Test development • Literature reviews • Consultation with teachers • Standardization sample • n = 2,000 • 11 different states • Second semester 1st graders and 2nd graders

  6. Domains • Rate – how fast the child writes • Legibility – how readable is a letter? • Form – does the letter make the shape it is supposed to with all lines connect, and all straight lines straight, and curved lines curved. • Alignment – does the letter rest within 1/16 above or below the base line? • Size – how big or small the letters are? • Spacing – how far apart or close together are the letters?

  7. Psychometric Properties (Reliability) • Interrater • Pearson Correlation (.77-.88) • Intrarater • Fisher’s Z • Rate – 1.00 • Legibility - .96 • Form and spacing - .97 • Alignment and Size - .99 • Test-retest • Rate – 71% • Legibility 64% • Form – 75% • Alignment - 86% • Size – 82% • Spacing – 76%

  8. Psychometric Properties – Validity • Content • Based on literature reviews and consultation with primary grade teachers • Construct • Manual does not explain but the explanation for content validity explains the construct as well • Criterion • Concurrent – measured using the Test of Visual Motor Skills • Strong association between first graders and students in special education with no OT, and for students receiving OT.

  9. Measurement concerns • Scores are subjective because they are based on the facilitator’s judgment of the handwriting. • Only inclusion criteria: • Child must be in 1st or 2nd grade • No exclusion criteria

  10. Test Length • 10-15 minutes for total administration and scoring. • 2.5 minutes to determine Rate • Child can finish sentence for legibility score.

  11. Test Cost • Starter kit - $87.00 • Manual • 1 D’Nealian pad • 1 Manuscript pad • Each pad has 25 sheets • Clear 6 inch ruler • Print pads $25 – • package of 4 pads of 25 sheets for each D’Nealian and Manuscript print pads

  12. Testing Procedures • Have student seated at a desk or table of appropriate height for their size • Lighting and ventilations should be appropriate and comfortable • Choose appropriate stimulus sheet (D’Nealian or Manuscript) depending on handwriting style practiced in the classroom. • Time the test for 2 ½ minutes to establish rate score. • If the student did not finish the sentence give additional time to finish the words to score the 5 quality categories

  13. Test Items

  14. Scoring

  15. Scoring Interpretation • Like Peers Level is equivalent to scoring in the top 75% of the range of students. • Somewhat Below Peers Level is equivalent to the bottom 5%-25% of the range of students. • These students should be monitored to determine the underlying problem. • Well Below Peers Level is equivalent to the bottom 5% of the range of students. • These students should be sent for an evaluation to determine the underlying problem.

  16. Test results

  17. Area(s) of occupation addressed • Education • MHA is best administered in a school setting.

  18. Reference Asher, I.E. (Ed.). (2014). Asher’s Occupational Therapy Assessment Tools (4th ed.). Bethesda,MD: AOTA Press. Reisman, J. (1999). Minnesota Handwriting Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Pearson. 

More Related