Primary care trigger tool
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 10

Primary Care Trigger Tool PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 215 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Primary Care Trigger Tool. Manaia Health PHO . Linda Holman Quality Leader. Background. Few studies on trigger tool use in primary care Primary care trigger tools have been used in Scotland and England NHS

Download Presentation

Primary Care Trigger Tool

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Primary care trigger tool

Primary Care Trigger Tool

Manaia Health PHO

Linda Holman

Quality Leader


Background

Background

  • Few studies on trigger tool use in primary care

  • Primary care trigger tools have been used in Scotland and England NHS

  • Sensitivity and specificity of primary care trigger tool in identifying harm not known


Method

Method

  • 37 triggers used initially

  • 170 patients in one large general practice identified

  • 50% of cohort Māori

  • Included children

  • Record for one year reviewed looking for presence of triggers and associated harm

  • Record also reviewed for harm without any trigger

  • 2 review teams (GP + nurse/pharmacist)


Primary care trigger tool

WHO: National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index for Categorising Error


Findings

Findings

  • 1034 triggers initially identified

  • 40 030 days of follow-up

  • 637 consultations

  • Harm found in 63 of these triggers + 1 outside of the defined triggers(corresponding to 45 individual events)

  • Harm categories: E = 48, F = 11, G = 3, H = 0, I = 1


Rates of harm

Rates of Harm

  • Rate of harm: 0.07 (95% CI 0.05-0.09)

  • Rate of harm per 100 patient years = 41 (95% CI 29-55)

  • Rate of harm between Māori and non-Māori

    no difference (adjusting for age and sex)

  • Rate of harm if male 0.53 (95% CI 0.29-0.98) adjusting for age and ethnicity


Triggers refined reduced to 8

Triggers refined & reduced to 8

  • Adverse reaction documented in PMS

  • ≥ consultations with a GP in 1 week

  • Cessation of medication

  • Reduction in medication dose

  • ≥6 medications prescribed

  • Seen in ED/A+M within 2 weeks of seeing GP

  • eGFR < 35

  • Death


Efficacy of refined tool

Efficacy of Refined Tool

  • Odds ratio of harm occurring is refined trigger tool used (adjusting for age, sex and ethnicity) 6.3 (95% CI 2.7-14.8)

  • Sensitivity of refined trigger tool 0.88

  • Specificity of refined trigger tool 0.48


Discussion

Discussion

  • Rates of harm comparable to published literature in primary care

  • Predominant cause of harm from medication

  • Small number of harms that could be linked to an actual error

  • Value in pharmacist being involved

  • Qualitative information gained during process valuable


  • Login