1 / 14

Pectus Repair

Pectus Repair. Joseph Crossman. INTRODUCTION. Patient: N.A., 13 y/o male Focus: 1)To discuss history and assessment data 2)To identify nursing diagnoses and outline an appropriate plan of care. HEALTHY HISTORY. Brief History: Uncomplicated vaginal birth at term Pectus Excavatum

jontae
Download Presentation

Pectus Repair

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pectus Repair Joseph Crossman

  2. INTRODUCTION • Patient: N.A., 13 y/o male • Focus: • 1)To discuss history and assessment data • 2)To identify nursing diagnoses and outline an appropriate plan of care

  3. HEALTHY HISTORY • Brief History: • Uncomplicated vaginal birth at term • Pectus Excavatum • Asymptomatic until adolescent • Chief complaint = SOB • Nuss procedure

  4. PSYCHOSOCIAL AND FAMILY HISTORY • Grandmother has custody • Mother and Father still together • Mother and Father still active in his life • Grandmother not at hospital • Cultural Considerations • Gamers, adolescent

  5. CURRENT HOSPITALIZATION • Reason for Admit • Scheduled Nuss procedure • Primary complaint: Shortness of breath • Diagnosis: PectusExcavatum • Patho:congenital abnormal growth of the chest wall, characterized by an “inversion” of the chest • Treatment Plan:Surgery, PT, recovery

  6. EXPECTED DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE • Theories: • Cognitive (Piaget): Formal Operations (Reasoning of abstract ideas) • Psychosocial (Erikson): Identity vs. Role Confusion (Finding “self”) • Psychosexual (Freud): Genital Stage (Strong interest in opposite sex) • IS THIS CHILD AGE APPROPRIATE? • Yes!

  7. PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT • NEURO: Awake and alert x3. Fatigued. Reports nausea. Pain 0 at lowest 7 at highest • Respiratory: Crackles in lower quadrants, diminished sounds bilaterally. Saturation 88-94%. Weaning from 2L NC to RA (100% on 2L). RR 26. Cough on deep inspiration. • CV: No Exceptions. • GI: Hypoactive bowel sounds. Constipation – multiple urges with no movement.

  8. PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT CON’T • GU: No exceptions. Voided at “last minute” of 1600 • SKIN:PIV @ L AC. Dressings at mid axillary line bilaterally at nipple height. • MUSCULOSKELETAL: Limited ROM in upper extremities. Lifting and ROM restriction – arms not allowed above or across chest. Severe pain/soreness along chest wall. • PSYCHOSOCIAL: Parents at bedside, active in care. • FALL RISK: Medium. Family constantly at bedside. Morphine PCA. Post-op.

  9. Pt Initials: NA Age: 13 Medical Diagnoses: Pectis excavatum 1. Risk for Infection R/T: Surgery (Pectis repair) Temp: ↑39.2C WBC: 5.4k “Burning” pain at right sided surgical site. Meds: Cefazolin 5 Constipation R/t: medication side effects Patient’s urge, but inability to pass stools x4 during clinical day Hypoactive bowel sounds Pt report of nausea Morphine PCA, valium Meds: Colace, dulcolax 3. Acute pain R/T: Surgery Pt report of pain (4/10 resting) increasing during movement at surgical sites along chest wall. Meds: Morphine PCA Toradol 2. Impaired Gas exchange R/t: Anesthesia -O2 saturation falling to between 88-94% on RA -100% o2 sat with 2L/min NC -Dizziness with exercise -Morphine and valium ↓ respiratory effort 6 Psychosocial: Health seeking behaviors  R/t: Increase in mobility with PT AEB: Patient states “I just want to move again even though it hurts” Patient asking when next PT session is Patient requesting to be OOB to chair 4. Impaired mobility R/t: dizziness, weakness, limitations of surgery -Dizziness with activity -Unsteady gait -Requires assistance with ambulation -Weakness with activity -May not use arms for support -Morphine, toradol, valium, Zofran, and dolcolax may all be contributing to dizziness

  10. EXPECTED OUTCOMES • Risk for Infection: Temperature will remain below 38.5C during hospital stay, surgical sites will remain free of infection. • Impaired Gas Exchange: 02 Saturation on room air will stay above 95% throughout stay. • Acute pain: Pain scores will be 2/10 or below while resting during hospitalization, and remain so after discharge. • Impaired mobility: Patient will steadily increase his mobility and distance walked with PT daily. Patient will not experience a fall during hospitalization.

  11. EXPECTED OUTCOMES 5. Constipation: Patient will be able to have a bowel movement P.O.D. 2. Patient will have regular bowel movements throughout hospital stay.

  12. HOLISTIC CARE GIVEN • NURSING: • TRADITIONAL: • Incentive spirometer • VS q4h • Ambulation assistance • I&O • O2 2L/min NC (PRN) • D5 1/2NS with 20Meq KCL • Encouraged to void (techniques) • Pulse Oximetry • Patient/family teaching • COMPLIMENTARY/ALTERNATIVE: • Offer to perform healthcare activities for family • Offer refreshments or meals to family • Other family comfort measures • COLLABORATIVE: Physical therapy BID, regular diet, antibiotics (Vanco)

  13. DISCHARGE PLANNING • Review S&S of infection • S&S of proper healing • Wound care basics • Provide information on resources to reduce caregiver role strain • Incentive Spirometer • Activity restrictions. NO LOG ROLLING/SIDE LAYING • Pain management • Alternate techniques • Side effects • Narcotics

  14. RESEARCH • Implemented a respiratory care bundle to all patients post-op • Incentive spirometer x10/hour • Frequent oral care • Early ambulation/raised HOB • 6 Months before implementation, 33 patients were sent to ICU due to respiratory distress • 6 Months in the intervention, 15 were sent • 12 Months in the intervention, 6 were sent • Lamar, J. (2012). Relationship of respiratory care bundle with incentive spirometry to reduced pulmonary complications in a medical general practice unit.MEDSURG Nursing, 21(1), 33-37. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com.proxy.lib.odu.edu/eds/detail?vid=10&sid=b8631269-3dcd-414c-9818- 91dba9ca5ea2@sessionmgr4002&hid=101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ==

More Related