Loading in 3 Seconds
Sponsored Search. Presenter: Lory Al Moakar. Outline. Motivation Problem Definition VCG solution GSP(Generalized Second Price) GSP vs. VCG Is GSP incentive compatible? GSP has a Nash Equilibrium formed of market clearing prices.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Sponsored Search
Presenter:
Lory Al Moakar
6
a1•
a2•
a3•
•s1
•s2
•s3
2
0
Pj = VN-iM – VN-iM-j
Assume i lies and is assigned slot k ≠ j which is the slot i gets if it does not lie.
= optimal valuation – (total valuation when i gets k) ≥ 0
Counterexample:
payoff = 28 – 4 = 24 < 30 a1 does not have the incentive to lower its bid
payoff = 60 – 40 = 20 a2 does not have the incentive to lower its bid
the advertiser with the highest valuation per click gets the top slot
advertiser i gets slot i
1. Construct a set of bids that produces a set of market clearing prices
Consider a set of market clearing prices pj
price per click for slot j : pj* = pj / rj
show that p1* p2* p3* …… pM*
Proof:
show that pj* pk*
Vk* – pk* Vk* – pj* pj* pk*
2. These bids form a Nash equilibrium
Show that with the above bids, no advertiser wants to lower his/her bid and no advertiser wants to raise his/her price.
Proof:
where j < k
advertiser j doesn’t want slot i at the current price so j does not want this slot at a higher price
this set of bids forms a Nash Equilibrium
Counterexample:
VCG
the worst equilibrium for the search engines
the best equilibrium for the advertisers
Incentive compatible
GSP
Not clear if it maximizes revenue
Has one optimal equilibrium
truth-telling is generally not an equilibrium strategy