1 / 11

Intermunicipal cooperation in Flanders CEMR, Brussels, 29.09.2005

Intermunicipal cooperation in Flanders CEMR, Brussels, 29.09.2005. Christof Delatter Association of Flemish Cities and Municipalities (Vereniging van Vlaamse Steden en Gemeenten – VVSG) www.vvsg.be Tel. +32 2 211.55.99 E-mail: christof.delatter@vvsg.be. This Presentation.

Download Presentation

Intermunicipal cooperation in Flanders CEMR, Brussels, 29.09.2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Intermunicipal cooperation in FlandersCEMR, Brussels, 29.09.2005 Christof Delatter Association of Flemish Cities and Municipalities (Vereniging van Vlaamse Steden en Gemeenten – VVSG) www.vvsg.be Tel. +32 2 211.55.99 E-mail: christof.delatter@vvsg.be

  2. This Presentation • History of IMC in Flanders • Actual legislation in Flanders • Will Europe make IMC impossible?

  3. History of IMC in Flanders (1)

  4. History of IMC in Flanders (2) • Today: intermunicipal cooperation in all kinds of policy fields: • Legal assistance • Waste management • Waste water management • Operating of crematories • Utilities (electricity, gas, water) • Media of communication (internet, television) • ICT • Regional economical development • Sport and recreation • Social welfare

  5. History of IMC in Flanders (3) • Belgian constitution: municipalities can cooperate for all matters of municipal interest • First law on IMC: 1922 ! • Municipalities often started IMC because of: • Risk-bearing ventures • Lack of know-how or means • Search for more efficiency • Dissatisfaction of services provided within contracts (concessions)

  6. History of IMC in Flanders (4) • Last ‘Belgian’ law: 1986 • IMC existed both with and without participation of private companies (< 50%) • 1993: regions became the competent authority on most matters concerning municipalities and intermunicipal cooperation

  7. History of IMC in Flanders (5) • 1997-2001: preparations for new legislation on intermunicipal cooperation in Flanders • Discussion about private sector participation • Transparancy of IMC • Need for more flexible structures for cooperation • July 2001: completely new Flemish decree on IMC provides 4 different forms of intermunicipal cooperation going from very low to very intensive

  8. Actual legislation in Flanders (1)

  9. Actual legislation in Flanders (2) • Some interesting aspects: • Municipalities decide wether they participate, but are committed after decision to associate • Transfer of competences = municipalities lose the right to act solely or in cooperation with other companies • Board of Directors contains representatives from political majority and opposition (observer) • Important decisions require an agreement of the municipalities (city council) • Still possibilities for partnerships with private companies, but on intermunicipal level • Structural Public Private Partnerships (PPP) • PPP based on contracts • Specific legislation for cooperation between Local Centers for Public Welfare in not-for-profit organisations

  10. Will Europe make IMC impossible? • Services of General Interest • Directive on services on the internal market • Discussion on “in-house” activities • Infringement-procedure against Belgium • DG Economy: • “IMC ≠ in-house” • “Agreement for intermunicipal cooperation should be subject to a tender”

  11. The future…. • Subsidiarity ? • Does Europe really believe in the importance of local government? • IMC has often prooved to be the benchmark for quality and costs for certain services also provided by private companies • Does Europe fear for a larger number of ‘players’ on the market….?

More Related