1 / 41

Recency vs Primacy -- an ongoing project

Recency vs Primacy -- an ongoing project. Nov 17 th 2009 Juan Gao. People. X2. X1. I 1. I 2. Leaky competing accumulators. Accumulation to the bound. Ratcliff 1978, 1999, Kiani et.al.2008,. Usher and McClelland 2001. Question.

jonah-hill
Download Presentation

Recency vs Primacy -- an ongoing project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recency vs Primacy-- an ongoing project Nov 17th 2009 Juan Gao

  2. People

  3. X2 X1 I1 I2 Leaky competing accumulators Accumulation to the bound Ratcliff 1978, 1999, Kiani et.al.2008, Usher and McClelland 2001 Question • What is the mechanism underlying perceptual decision making in time-controlled paradigm? Two successful models x t

  4. How are they different • In ATB • earlier > later --primacy. • In LCA • earlier > later if inhibition> leak --primacy; • later > earlier if leak>inhibition --recency. See also a theoretical study by Zhou, Wong-Lin and Holmes 2009

  5. inhibition > leak leak > inhibition Usher McClelland 2001 A sequence of 16 H and S letters flashing one by one. Are their more Hs or Ss? H S H H H S H S H H S H S S S S

  6. Kiani, Tanks and Shadlen 2008 Random dots. Time controlled. Stimulus duration = exponential distribution. ‘go’ cue followed by 300ms response window.

  7. Earlier pulse matters more

  8. Earlier pulse matters more

  9. If Yes, ATB Two monkeys? Earlier > Later for all subjects? Earlier > Later in all moving dots experiments? If no, what determines it?

  10. Ongoing Experiment • Random dot motion stimuli, following the procedure in Kiani et.al. • Multiple coherences, [6.4, 12.8, 25,6, 51.2]. But for figures in this talk, we collapse data across coherence levels. • Three participants per experiment, each run for up to 25 sessions • Ongoing recruitment, Ongoing analysis…

  11. The experiments 0. Repeat Kiani 2008 1. Same question, different experiment setup. 2. Release the time pressure.

  12. 1) Early 2) Late 3) Constant 4) Switch Experiment 1 Stimulus Duration

  13. Results in Exp.1 CS

  14. Results in Exp.1 CS

  15. Results in Exp.1 MT

  16. Results in Exp.1 MT

  17. Results in Exp.1 SC

  18. Results in Exp.1 SC

  19. Take home message • Yes, it seems earlier > later in all three subjects with this time pressure.

  20. The experiments 0.Repeat Kiani 2008 1. Same question, different experiment setup. • 2. Release the time pressure. • Stimulus duration: exponential  uniform; • Response Window: 300ms  1 s.

  21. Results in Exp.2, without time pressure MM

  22. Results in Exp.2, without time pressure MM

  23. Results in Exp.2, without time pressure WW

  24. Results in Exp.2, without time pressure WW

  25. Results in Exp.2, without time pressure DG

  26. Results in Exp.2, without time pressure DG

  27. Take home message • Yes, it seems earlier > later in all three subjects with this time pressure. • As time pressure gets released, earlier = later.

  28. Take home message • Yes, it seems earlier > later in all subjects with this time pressure. • As time pressure gets released, earlier = later. • Uniform distribution  only long stimulus condition:later > earlier. possible future direction

  29. Take home message • Yes, it seems earlier > later in all subjects with this time pressure. • As time pressure gets released, earlier = later. • Uniform distribution  only long stimulus condition:later > earlier. possible future direction It’s all about time!

  30. What this means to the models • So far • LCA can account for the observations by decreasing the inhibition. • ATB can do the same by raising the bound. • When future is now, If later> earlier • LCA is more general. • Is decision making a fixed process or does it depends on experiment setup?

  31. Back up slides

  32. A theoretical study Zhou, Wong-Lin and Holmes 2009

  33. Usher McClelland 2001 A sequence of 16 H and S letters flashing one by one. Are their more Hs or Ss? H S H H H S H S H H S H S S S S

  34. Literature 1 Drift Diffusion model: dx = A dt + noise. A is a constant Zhou, Wong-Lin and Holmes 2009

  35. Literature 1 OU process: dx = (bx+A) dt + noise. Stable when b<0, unstable when b>0. Zhou, Wong-Lin and Holmes 2009

  36. Results in Exp 1. The pulse study SC

  37. mt

  38. Both successful models Time (ms) Usher and McClelland 2001

More Related