Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
Download
1 / 58

Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule Bruce Macler USEPA Region 9 415 972-3569 macler.bruceepa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 195 Views
  • Uploaded on

Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule Bruce Macler USEPA Region 9 415 972-3569 [email protected] H. Cl. Br. Cl. Bromodichloromethane. Stage 2 DBPR. Will ultimately require TTHM and HAA5 MCL compliance at each monitoring point in distribution system

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule Bruce Macler USEPA Region 9 415 972-3569 macler.bruceepa' - jon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts RuleBruce MaclerUSEPA Region 9415 [email protected]

H

Cl

Br

Cl

Bromodichloromethane


Stage 2 dbpr
Stage 2 DBPR

  • Will ultimately require TTHM and HAA5 MCL compliance at each monitoring point in distribution system

    • No averaging across distribution

    • Goal to control for DBP "hot spots“

    • More linkage between wholesalers and retailers

  • Initial Distribution System Evaluation

    • Monitoring requirement to determine compliance points

  • Proposed August 18, 2003

    • Federal Register v.68, n.159, pp49547-49596

  • Final Rule expected December 15, 2005*


Regulatory schedule
*Regulatory Schedule

  • S2 DBPR expected to be signed by EPA Administrator on December 15, 2006

    • At same time as LT2 ESWTR

  • Publication in Federal Register is official “promulgation” date- January?

  • 60-day Congressional review hold

  • Rounded to beginning of following month for “effective” date

    • April 1, 2006 starts the ball rolling


Purpose of the stage 2 dbpr
Purpose of the Stage 2 DBPR

  • Purpose is to provide additional protection from disinfection byproducts of concern

  • Supplements existing S1 D/DBPR by focusing on parts of distribution system with higher risks


Significant changes from proposal
Significant Changes from Proposal

  • Proposed Interim “Stage 2A” MCLs to apply before final “Stage 2B” locational MCLs

    • Deleted these as too complex

  • Proposed early implementation dates

    • Now will be staggered

  • Proposed system-based monitoring

    • Now will be based on population served

  • Added criteria and details on “Significant Excursions”


Systems affected by the stage 2 dbpr
Systems Affected bythe Stage 2 DBPR

Applies to all CWSs and NTNCWSs that add a disinfectant other than UV, or deliver water that has been treated with a disinfectant other than UV

  • Systems using surface water

  • Systems using ground water under the influence of surface water

  • Ground water systems

  • Consecutive systems

Consecutive systems are defined in the Stage 2 Rule as public water systems that buy or otherwise receive some or all of their finished water from one or more wholesale systems for at least 60 days per year.


Why are consecutive systems an issue
Why Are Consecutive Systems an Issue?

  • Wholesalers’ MCL requirements end at turnouts…

  • Some regulated contaminants increase in the distribution system

    • TTHMs

    • Coliform bacteria

  • States have taken varying approaches to regulating DBPs in consecutive systems


Definitions
Definitions

  • Consecutive systemis a public water system that buys or otherwise receives some or all of its finished water from one or more wholesale system(s), for at least 60 days per year

  • Finished water is water that is introduced into the distribution system of a public water system and is intended for distribution without further treatment, except that necessary to maintain water quality

  • Wholesale system is a public water system that treats source water and then sells or otherwise delivers finished water to another public water system for at least 60 days per year. Delivery may be through a direct connection or through the distribution system of one or more consecutive systems

  • Combined distribution system is the interconnected distribution system consisting of the distribution systems of wholesale systems and of the consecutive systems that receive finished water from those wholesale systems


Stage 2 dbpr components
Stage 2 DBPR Components

  • Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE)

  • New compliance monitoring locations

    • Sites chosen from IDSE and/or Stage 1 DBPR sites

    • Locational Running Annual Average

    • Operational Evaluations

  • Inclusion of consecutive systems

  • Population based compliance

  • Revisions to Stage 1 DBPR

    • Reduced monitoring based on TOC

    • Bromate reduced monitoring


Source water toc reduced dbp monitoring
Source Water TOC Reduced DBP Monitoring

  • Stage 1 DBPR

    • Systems with

      • TTHM < 0.040 mg/L, HAA5 < 0.030 mg/L, and TOC < 4.0 mg/L as a running annual average can qualify for reduced monitoring of TTHM and HAA5

      • No timeframe specified

  • Stage 2 DBPR

    • Timeframe added

    • To qualify for reduced monitoring sample every 30 days

    • To stay on reduced monitoring sample every 90 days


Reduced monitoring for bromate
Reduced Monitoring for Bromate

  • Stage 1 DBPR

    • Systems that use ozone monitor for bromate at the entry point to the distribution system.

    • Reduced monitoring if bromide in source water is < 0.05 mg/L

    • Stays in effect until December 31, 2008

  • Stage 2 DBPR

    • Reduced monitoring if bromate is < 0.0025 mg/L RAA at entry point to the distribution system

      • New analytical method for bromate with lower detection limit

      • System must have 12 months of data utilizing new method

    • Goes into effect January 1, 2009


Consecutive systems
Consecutive Systems

  • Must comply with IDSE requirements

  • Must conduct TTHM and HAA5 compliance monitoring

  • Must comply with the Stage 1 DBPR requirements for chlorine and chloramines

    • Daily monitoring

    • MCLs (4.0 mg/L)


Challenges for consecutive systems
Challenges for Consecutive Systems

  • If receiving treated water

    • Likely to contain DBPs already

    • May contain high levels of precursors and disinfectants that make more DBPs over time

  • Upstream treatment changes may substantially affect downstream water quality

    • Long-term

    • Variable or episodic


Mcl compliance challenges for consecutive systems
MCL Compliance Challenges for Consecutive Systems

  • S1 DBPR controlled DBP precursors

    • Not an option for consecutive systems

  • S2 DBPR introduces new BATs for consecutive systems

    • Chloramination (>10,000 only)

    • Management of flow and storage

  • These may not work

    • May need locational treatment in distribution system

Stora ge


Population based monitoring and scheduling
Population-Based Monitoring and Scheduling

  • Stage 1 DBPR

    • Scheduling based on source water type and population served

    • Monitoring based on source water type, population served, and number of plants

  • Stage 2 DBPR

    • Scheduling based on source water type, population served, and population of systems in combined distribution system

    • Monitoring based on source water type and population served


Combined distribution systems cds
Combined Distribution Systems (CDS)

  • All systems in a CDS (i.e., wholesalers, consecutive systems) must comply with Stage 2 DBPR requirements on the same schedule

    • Compliance date is based on the largest system in the CDS 

    • Largest system is not necessarily the wholesaler

  • State has discretion to determine CDS

    • Emergency or seasonal connections


Combined distribution systems
Combined Distribution Systems

Consecutive System

Wholesale System

Consecutive System

Treatment

Plant

System A

System B

System C

R

i

v

e

r

Combined Distribution

System


Combined distribution system example
Combined Distribution System Example

All 3 systems must comply based on the schedule of System B

(Schedule 2)

System A

System serving 12,000

System C System serving 500

Sells water to. . .

Who treats and sells water to. . .

System B

System serving 60,000


Violations
Violations

Monitoring and MCL violations are attributed to the PWS where the violation occurred

Example

System A sells to System B and a violation occurs in System B

B

A

System B is in violation because it has the legal responsibility for complying with the MCL

System B may set up a contract with System A that details water quality delivery specifications


Public notice and consumer confidence reports
Public Notice and Consumer Confidence Reports

  • Responsibility of individual system

  • Wholesale system is responsible for notifying the consecutive system of analytical results and violations related to monitoring

  • Consecutive system must include the wholesale system’s monitoring results in the consumer confidence report

  • Consecutive system must conduct appropriate public notification upon a violation (whether in the wholesale or consecutive system)


Initial distribution system evaluation idse
Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE)

  • Studies conducted by water systems to identify distribution system locations that represent high TTHM and HAA5 levels

  • Results of the IDSE are used to select Stage 2 compliance monitoring sites

  • Not required for NTNCWSs serving fewer than 10,000 people

  • In addition to current regulatory monitoring


Initial distribution system evaluation options
Initial Distribution System Evaluation Options

  • Standard monitoring

    • One-year study of TTHM and HAA levels in distribution system using protocol

  • System-specific study using models and data

    • Must accomplish same goal as standard approach

  • “40/30 Monitoring Waiver”

    • ALL existing data are <40 ug/L for TTHM and <30 ug/L for HAA

  • Very small systems waiver

    • <500 people and existing monitoring site representative


Idse options cont
IDSE Options (cont.)

Very Small System Waiver

  • Systems serving < 500 people

  • Can be granted by the State, if the State determines that the Stage 1 site represents both high TTHM and HAA5 concentrations

Waiver

40/30 Certification

  • All Stage 1 compliance monitoring results (not just LRAAs) are under 40 g/L TTHM and 30 g/L HAA5

  • Monitoring periods are specified in rule


Idse options cont1
IDSE Options (cont.)

System Specific Study (SSS)

  • The system must evaluate DBP concentrations throughout the distribution system using existing data source or combination of data sources (e.g., historical data, hydraulic monitoring results)

  • Report must be submitted to the State

  • System must conduct 1 year of distribution system monitoring for TTHM and HAA5

  • Report must be submitted to the State

Standard Monitoring Program (SMP)


Compliance spread over time
Compliance Spread Over Time

  • Systems >100,000 plus consecutives start first

    • 257 SW+ 22 GW systems in R9

  • Systems 50-100K plus consecutives

    • Start six months after first group

    • 69 SW + 33 GW systems in next group

  • Systems 10-50K plus consecutives

    • Start six months after second group

    • 86 SW + 181 GW

  • Systems <10K

    • Start six months after third group

    • 535 SW + 3516 GW


Idse schedule
IDSE Schedule

Schedule for systems in a combined distribution system is based on that of the largest system in the combined distribution system


Idse challenges for consecutive systems
IDSE Challenges for Consecutive Systems

  • No previous DBP monitoring requirements

    • May lack data to determine appropriate monitoring locations for Stage 2 DBPR

    • May not be eligible for VSS Waiver or 40/30 Certification under IDSE

  • Must work with wholesaler, maybe others

    • Work together to find or get data

    • Samples may have been taken in consecutive system’s distribution system


Standard monitoring
Standard Monitoring

  • One of four options for compliance with IDSE requirements

  • Most systems that need to complete an IDSE will use this option- hopefully!

  • Process is set by U.S. EPA

    • Frequency, number, and location of samples


Standard monitoring idse steps
Standard Monitoring IDSE Steps

  • Select locations for Standard Monitoring

  • Prepare and submit Standard Monitoring plan

    • Primacy Agency must approve or modify the plan

  • Conduct Standard Monitoring

    • 12 months of monitoring for TTHM and HAA5

  • Select Stage 2 DBPR compliance monitoring locations

  • Prepare and submit IDSE report


Required components of standard monitoring plan
Required Components of Standard Monitoring Plan

  • Distribution system schematic

    • Entry points and sources

    • Locations and dates of proposed Standard Monitoring sites

    • Locations and dates of Stage 1 DBPR monitoring sites

  • Population served

  • Source water type

  • Justification of Standard Monitoring sites

    • Must include data used to justify selection of Standard Monitoring sites


Sampling requirements
Sampling Requirements

  • What, where, and how often do I sample?

    • Samples Collected

      • Dual sample set (both TTHM and HAA5) collected at all locations

    • Sample Locations

      • High TTHM levels

      • High HAA5 levels

      • Average Residence Time

      • Near Entry Points

    • Number of sites

      • Based on system type

    • Sample Frequency

      • 1, 4 or 6 samples during the year at each location

      • Number based on population served and source type


Standard monitoring requirements
Standard Monitoring Requirements

  • When do I sample?

    • Sample months

      • Peak historical month

        • Peak TTHM levels or

        • Peak HAA5 levels or

        • Month of warmest water temperature

      • Subsequent sample months every 60 days or every 90 days from peak historical month


Tthm and haa5 standard monitoring 1
TTHM and HAA5 Standard Monitoring(1)

  • For GW systems or systems that purchase GW

(1) A dual sample set (i.e., a TTHM and an HAA5 sample) must be taken at each monitoring location during each monitoring period.

(2) Taken during peak historical month. The peak historical month is the month with the highest TTHM or HAA5 levels or the warmest water temperature.

(3) You must monitor at or near the entry point if you are a consecutive system. If you are not a consecutive system, you must monitor at a high HAA5 location.


Tthm and haa5 standard monitoring
TTHM and HAA5 Standard Monitoring

  • For Surface and GWUDI systems and systems that purchase surface or GWUDI


Standard monitoring site selection justification
Standard Monitoring Site Selection – Justification

  • Plan must include a justification for the selection of sites to be sampled during Standard Monitoring

  • Data sources and tools

    • Distribution system maps

    • Water quality data

    • Distribution system operating data


Factors affecting dbp formation
Factors Affecting DBP Formation

  • Precursor concentration

  • Disinfectant - type and dose

  • Water chemistry

  • Water temperature

  • Water age

  • Biodegradation of HAAs


Tthm formation
TTHM Formation

High TTHM concentration

Organics

Disinfection


Haa5 formation
HAA5 Formation

High HAA5 concentration

Organics

Disinfection


Data sources and tools for site selection
Data Sources and Tools for Site Selection

  • Distribution system maps

    • Pipes

      • Dead ends

      • Length and diameter

      • Age and material

    • Land use

      • Highly and lightly developed areas

      • Major users

    • Entry points and sources

    • Key components

      • Tanks, pump stations, booster chlorination


Data sources and tools for site selection1
Data Sources and Tools for Site Selection

  • Water quality data

    • Source water quality

    • DBP data

      • Can use Stage 1 DBPR data for information

      • Cannot use Stage 1 DBPR sites for Standard Monitoring sites

    • Disinfectant residual data

      • Can be indicative of water age

      • May indicate biodegradation of HAA5


Data sources and tools for site selection2
Data Sources and Tools for Site Selection

  • Distribution system operating data

    • Understanding water flow

      • Pump run times

      • Metered flows between pressure zones

      • Billing records for major users

      • Advanced tools (hydraulic modeling or tracer studies)

    • Impact of tanks

      • Tank level records and tank configurations

    • Impact of booster chlorination


Selecting near entry point sites
Selecting Near Entry Point Sites

  • Tools

    • Distribution system map

  • Location

    • After treatment

    • Before first customer (not required)

  • If fewer entry points than needed

    • Replace with high TTHM and HAA5 sites

      • Alternate, starting with TTHM


Selecting near entry point sites example

x

Monitoring Location

Selecting Near Entry Point Sites– Example

  • System needs 1 location near entry point

  • System has 2 surface water treatment plants and 1 well = 3 entry points

  • System considers flows from each source

    • WTP 1 – 5 MGD

    • WTP 2 – 3 MGD

    • Well 1 – 0.75 MGD

  • Locate site near entry point for WTP 1

WTP 1:

5 MGD

WTP 2:

3 MGD

Well 1:

0.75 MGD


Selecting average residence time sites
Selecting Average Residence Time Sites

  • Determination

    • Flow weighted calculation

    • Population weighted calculation

  • Tools

    • Distribution system map

    • Distribution system operational data

      • Hydraulic modeling or tracer study

      • Pump run times, metered flow

    • Distribution system water quality data

      • Average Disinfectant Residual


Selecting high tthm sites
Selecting High TTHM Sites

  • TTHM formation

    • Advanced water age is primary factor

  • Good TTHM sites

    • Downstream of tanks

    • Dead ends, but prior to last customer

    • Hydraulic dead ends and mixing zones

    • Downstream of booster chlorination

    • Sites with difficulty maintaining residual

    • Areas with low water use

    • Areas of high historic levels


Selecting high haa5 sites

HAA5 formation

Water age, but also consider biodegradation

Avoid

Areas with known biofilm growth

Areas with difficulty maintaining a residual

Good HAA5 sites

Downstream of booster chlorination

Sites with low but detectable residual

Areas of high historic levels

Downstream of tanks

Hydraulic dead ends and mixing zones

Areas with low water use

Selecting High HAA5 Sites


Standard monitoring site selection
Standard Monitoring Site Selection

Data Sources and Tools

  • Preliminary data will present many “candidate sites” from which the system can choose “selected sites”

Disinfectant residual, maps, models, etc.

Select Candidate Sites

Select Standard

Monitoring Sites

Narrow Down

Selection


Final selected sites
Final “Selected” Sites

  • Some site selection will be obvious

    • Near entry point

  • Others will require professional judgment

    • Consider geographic representation

    • Consider hydraulic representation

    • Consider areas fed by sources with higher DBPs

    • Use sites that “multi-task”

    • Consider accessibility


Submitting standard monitoring plan
Submitting Standard Monitoring Plan

  • Once the system has collected and analyzed its information, it must prepare the plan and submit it to the Primacy Agency

    • Must include required information


Primacy agency review of standard monitoring plan
Primacy Agency Review of Standard Monitoring Plan

  • Primacy Agency will review the monitoring plan submitted by the system

    • Verify that it contains required elements

    • Review Standard Monitoring site selection and justification

  • Primacy Agency may approve or modify plan

If the Primacy Agency does not take action within 12 months from the date when the Plan was due, the system can consider the plan approved


Next steps
Next Steps

  • Conduct 12 months of monitoring based on Standard Monitoring Plan

    • As approved or amended by Primacy Agency

    • Begin monitoring when plan has been approved, or 12 months from submission deadline

  • Prepare and submit IDSE report

    • Purpose of the report is to identify Stage 2 DBPR Compliance Monitoring Sites


Selecting stage 2 monitoring sites
Selecting Stage 2 Monitoring Sites

  • Calculate a locational running annual average (LRAA) for each IDSE site and Stage 1 DBPR site

  • Select sites with highest LRAA values according to Stage 2 requirements

  • May select sites with slightly lower LRAA values, but must provide rationale in report

    • Provides better geographic coverage

    • Maintain historic data collection

    • Site is used to sample for other water quality parameters


Idse reporting requirements
IDSE Reporting Requirements

  • If using 40/30 certification waiver

    • All TTHM and HAA5 results from compliance monitoring required to qualify for the 40/30 certification

    • All TTHM and HAA5 results from compliance monitoring taken after the qualifying period for State review

    • A schematic of the distribution system with results noted

    • Proposed Stage 2B sites and schedule


Idse reporting requirements1
IDSE Reporting Requirements

  • If using System Specific Study

    • All studies, reports, analytical results, and modeling used

    • Stage 1 TTHM and HAA5 analytical results from the study period

    • A schematic of the distribution system

    • Proposed Stage 2B monitoring sites and schedule


Idse reporting requirements2
IDSE Reporting Requirements

  • If using Standard Monitoring Plan

    • SMP and Stage 1 TTHM and HAA5 analytical results

    • The original monitoring plan and data used to justify SMP site selections

    • A schematic of the distribution system with the results, location, and date of all SMP and Stage 1 samples noted

    • Proposed Stage 2 monitoring sites and schedule

    • Justification for Stage 2 selection if needed


System recordkeeping
System Recordkeeping

  • Must keep a copy of their IDSE plan and IDSE report as well as state modification or approval for 10 years after date of submittal

  • Make all available for review by the state or the public

  • CCR must include the range of sample results from the IDSE monitoring in same calendar year as sampling occurred


Primacy agency recordkeeping
Primacy Agency Recordkeeping

  • Must retain a copy of IDSE study plan and any modifications until replaced by the approved IDSE report

  • Must retain a copy of IDSE report and any modifications until replaced or revised in its entirety


Stage 2 implications for r9 dw systems
Stage 2 Implications for R9 DW Systems

  • Monitoring is complex

    • Expect M/R violations

  • For most systems, few changes in monitoring points expected

  • Hot spots will be found for some, but unclear how they can be controlled


ad