1 / 41

Ethics and Managed Care

Ethics and Managed Care. Where did it go wrong? (If it did?). Louis Harris Poll, 1980. 97% of HMO enrollees satisfied, would renew 30% of non-members find HMO concept very attractive. WARNING. The following slide contains adult language. “Fucking HMO bastard pieces of shit!”.

jolie
Download Presentation

Ethics and Managed Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ethics and Managed Care Where did it go wrong? (If it did?)

  2. Louis Harris Poll, 1980 • 97% of HMO enrollees satisfied, would renew • 30% of non-members find HMO concept very attractive

  3. WARNING The following slide contains adult language.

  4. “Fucking HMO bastard pieces of shit!” --As Good As It Gets (1997)

  5. You know you’ve joined a cheap HMO when….….They give you Viagra tablets in different colors with little “m’s” on them. --David Letterman

  6. What is managed care? • Same organization combines two functions • Insurance • Delivery of services • Specified, covered population • Prospective financing of services from a limited budget • Buchanan, 1998

  7. The first HMO’s • 1940’s • Either labor union-driven or community cooperative (all non-profit) • Payment per member per month (capitation) • Financial incentive to keep people healthy • Group practice/clinic model

  8. Turning Point: 1970-1980 • Health care share of GDP went up from 4% to 10-12% since 1945 • Big Three realized they were paying more on a per-car basis for health care than for steel • For first time, HMO’s attractive as a way to cut costs, not as a way to change the direction and quality of care

  9. 1980-2000 • New Federal legislation encourages creation of HMO’s • Some evidence early that this led to a slow-down in rise of health costs (temporarily) • Suddenly for-profit managed care is the fastest growing segment of industry

  10. Kaiser plan, 1970 • Has served same population for 30 years • Very stable group of physicians and staff • Most work there out of choice • Work as team to assure that quality of care is kept high • The “competition” is very wasteful, so even a modest trimming of costs makes Kaiser the best deal

  11. Acme HMO, 2000 • May have been created yesterday • Physicians are tied in “virtual” network, no history of teamwork • Rapid turnover of patients, no way to capture savings from preventive care • Competition lean and mean; can’t compete unless costs cut to the bone

  12. Does the term “managed care” specify an entity with a constant, predictable set of ethical problems?

  13. Basic ethical problem • Physician or nurse as “gatekeeper” • Gatekeeper may recommend care as “medically necessary” or not • Plan pays for “medically necessary” care • If less care recommended, staff may make more money (or may be retained, not fired)

  14. Rationing • Bedside Rationing

  15. Rationing • There is a limited amount of resources available • Need/demand exceeds the available resources • We must have SOME system to decide who gets how much • Ability to pay • Lottery • Degree of need • Etc.

  16. Where Rationing Occurs Administrative Level Bedside Level

  17. Administrative Rationing • Policymakers set very general guidelines based on data of effectiveness and cost • Physicians at bedside merely apply those guidelines with virtually no discretion • Examples: • No one over age 70 gets renal dialysis • No one gets expensive anti-ulcer medication for more than 2 months

  18. “[I]t is society, not the individual practitioner, that must make the decision to limit the availability of effective but expensive types of medical care.” --Norman Levinsky (p. 102)

  19. Bedside Rationing • Physician/nurse caring for individual patient • Makes a decision not to provide some treatment • Decides on basis of relative need of this patient vs. other patients in “plan”

  20. Trust and Rationing • Levinsky’s argument: • If administrative rationing, physician is still uncompromising in personal dedication to patient welfare • If bedside rationing, physician a double agent-- willing to compromise patient welfare in name of cost saving or service to “society” (= other patients)

  21. Fee-for-service practice • Patient (or insurance company) paid a set amount for each service • Strong financial incentive for physician to recommend or perform unnecessary services • Return office visits • Unnecessary surgery • Unnecessary labs, x-rays

  22. No one has yet designed a way of financing health care that pays the providers when, and only when, they do something beneficial for the patient --so every plan has some perverse incentives

  23. Is Less Care the Problem? • Assume ethical flaw in managed care is that physician is rewarded for doing less for the patient • Assumes that more care is always better care • If so, should see consistent trend in research for managed care to have worse outcomes (not so)

  24. One Example: ABMT • ABMT for advanced breast cancer: thought to provide 10-15% chance of survival when all else has failed • Costs ~ $150,000 • Many women sued HMOs successfully when ABMT denied because “experimental” • Latest research-- ABMT adds nothing to survival in advanced breast cancer

  25. The real question • Is gatekeeping ethical? • Can gatekeeping be avoided?

  26. What is Gatekeeping? • Physician cares for a population of patients • Limited budget • If patient #1 gets something, there is something that the other patients will not get • Comparative judgments of relative priorities of need among patients

  27. Example 1. ICU nurse • Nurse has 2 patients • Mr. Smith: Just about ready to transfer out but has a lot of questions • Mrs. Jones: Acutely unstable, impending multiple organ system failure; unsure of cause • Who will you spend more time with?

  28. Example 2. Primary care office • NP has waiting room full of patients • Mrs. Green: Has a 10-min appointment, starts to complain of several new problems which she has had for years • Mr. White: Has a 10-min appointment; “Oh by the way” chest pain • Will you reschedule or run overtime?

  29. Inevitability of Gatekeeping • Time and not just money is a limited resource • So long as you have more than one patient in your practice, you must always make tradeoffs among needs of different patients • Seems reasonable to make tradeoffs based on best assessment of relative need

  30. Inevitability of Gatekeeping (Morreim) • Policy-makers write clinical guidelines to save money and maintain quality • All guidelines have “wiggle room” • Physician must decide whether to adhere to guideline or try to declare this patient an exception-- both “bedside” decisions impact on resources available to other patients

  31. Eddy’s Argument • Two positions • First position: I am generally healthy, my chances of getting any one particular disease are relatively low • Second position: I already have developed an advanced disease

  32. 30yo Healthy Woman • Would rather have lower premiums and put money in kid’s college fund, etc. • Strong interest in funding preventive care e.g. mammograms • Little interest in funding “desperation” care like ABMT

  33. 45yo Woman with Metastatic Breast Cancer • Prevention is now of no use • “I’ve paid my premiums for all those years; now it’s my turn to get something back” • Strong interest in having funding for “last ditch” measures even if low likelihood of success

  34. Eddy: The Conflict • Should we interpret the ethical question as “the patient vs. society”? • Or is it ourselves at one point in our lives vs. ourselves at another point in our lives? • If the latter, which of the two positions is ethically privileged in terms of taking a moral priority for health policy? • Eddy argues: First position

  35. When is Gatekeeping Unethical? • Very generally-- when financial incentives are so intrusive into physician’s thoughts that she is highly likely to place financial concerns ahead of concerns for the well-being of the patient

  36. Bowman Case (TN) • Prisoner died of pneumonia; had known sickle cell disease • For profit prison management firm had capitated contract with physician • By denying care physician could double his annual income • No “carve out” for prisoners with known serious illnesses

  37. Gatekeeping cases: spectrum Predominant duty is to conserve scarce resources for others Predominant duty is to do what’s best for sick person Example:IV antibiotics for pneumonia “Gray zone”-- tough choice (e.g., treatment very expensive but also very beneficial) Example: MRI scan for tension headaches

  38. For-Profit Managed Care • Is this form of financing inherently unethical? • Is a for-profit plan inherently less trustworthy?

  39. Non-Profit Plan

  40. For-Profit Plan

  41. For-Profit vs. Nonprofit • Unless for-profit plans considerably more efficient, they will have less $ to spend on care • No evidence of such efficiency • BUT at least a few non-profit plans spend less on care than a few for-profit plans, tho on average NP spends greater percentage than FP

More Related