Evolving trends in high performance infrastructure

1. Evolving trends in high performance infrastructure Andrew F. Bach Chief Architect FSI – Juniper Networks

2. Agenda • The Need For High Performance 5 4 1 2 3 The challenge The limitations today Resulting trends Impact on Data center Infrastructure

3. Agenda • The Need For High Performance 5 4 1 2 3 Thechallenge The limitations A better solution Junipers products and next steps

4. Transactions become Bandwidth Distributed to the Financial Community (Terabits/Sec) from OPRA system

5. 400+ years of rapid technology adoption • And a rich history of technology innovation in markets… • First stock ticker to disseminate data (1867) • First telephones on the trading floors (1878) • First electronic ticker display board (1966) • Wireless handheld devices on Trading floors 15 years before ipad invented (1995) • Industry’s first private network offeringglobal connectivity • Industry’s private network exceeds 1TbS

6. Agenda • The Need For Speed 5 4 1 2 3 The challenge The limitations A better solution Junipers products and next steps

7. FSS Challenges • Regulatory model is driving change • Requirement for long term retention of data • Requirement to archive meta data • Real time risk management is now required • FSS is evolving to a commodity industry • Time to market must be faster • Product life time is shorting • Margins are reducing driving OPEX reduction • Technology adoption is continuing to accelerating to meet accelerating business needs • Fuel the race to the triple crown of technology (0 cost, 0 latency, 0 time to market);Technology is a strategic weapon • Bandwidth demand continues to grow at 30% - 50% per year. • Comprehensive management and orchestration of the data center • Fundamental new architectures are required • Flat Clos like architectures • Tightly coupled datacenter network to the wide area optical network • Tightly couple the Networks and the servers - SDN

8. A typical challenge Gateway Symbol routing risk management Customer TOR TOR Matching engine CORE CORE TOR TOR CORE CORE TOR TOR TOR TOR Trade Plant Size: ≈ 100 Servers ≈ 1500 Ports Grand Total ≈150.0µS

9. Agenda • The Need For Speed 5 4 1 2 3 The challenge The limitations today A better solution Junipers products and next steps

10. LATENCYREDUCTIONTRENDS (TOR) 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 Ethernet is narrowingthegapto Infiniband;industrytracking to <450nsin2013

11. Slowing of processor speed

12. THE TRADE OFF AXIS RELIABILITY FEATURE VELOCITY LATENCY SCALE

13. Agenda • The Need For Speed 5 4 1 2 3 The challenge The limitations Resulting trends Junipers products and next steps

14. A different approach - Distributed computing Symbol routing embedded in TOR Risk Management embedded in TOR Customer Matching engine NIC CORE TOR TOR NIC CORE TOR TOR Trade Plant Size: ≈ 60 Servers ≈ 1000 Ports Data pre/post processing Grand Total ≈100.0µS Reduced by 50µS

15. Applications Embedded Networking – the new way to reduce latency and cost • The race to zero is ending • at about 200 – 500NS for a reasonable switch • Need to focus on a different approach • Imbed application snippets into the switching fabric • Lower latency • Eliminates servers • Reduces network ports • Imbed snippets at the control or data plane of the network • Application can be embedded in a VM in the switch of into a FPGA in the data path of the switch

16. Return of the Clos data center Fabrics 100% of all National market da runs on JNPR All US markets distribute market data over JNPR 90% Allequity order flow Data Center 1 Layer Carrier Hotel CustomerConnections

17. Data Center Simplification Lowercost and ease of use • Four architectures for a data center, all the same building blocks • Stand alone TOR’s • MC-LAG • Virtual Chassis • Fabric • Solutions range from classic to fabric • All share common management support • All are SDN enabled and support advanced management tools and scripting

18. WAN – FSS building their own private carrier networks • Lease a service/cloud • Shared service • Reduced agility • Resiliency tested at failure time • Easy solution – no need for a technical staff • Good solution for a medium to small firm • Build and operate a private cloud • Dedicated service • Rapidly adaptable to meet changing requirements • Customer defines and validates resiliency, easing regulatory compliance • Needs a small skilled staff • Lower cost as third parties profit is removed

19. Agenda • The Need For Speed 5 4 1 2 3 The challenge The limitations A better solution Impact on the data center infrastructure

20. Impact on Compute and network • Centralize processing where you can distribute where you must • Processors and network switches and hitting natural limits • To achieve a high performance infrastructure compute resource must be distributed • Optimize computing in the Server, NIC(FPGA), and network Switches(VM’s and FPGA’s) – not just one place • Drive to Clos fabrics • Heavy East – West Traffic • Compounded Bandwidth growth > 20% per year • All networks become virtual

21. Bandwidth demands • Servers will be requiring 40G • As CPU cores increase by 2016 server bandwidth will need 40G • High end servers will need 100G • Servers at 100G will drive the need for network links of 400G and 1T

22. Impact of SDN/NFV/Orchestration • Manages virtual fiber plant • Controls the adds/moves/changes from the servers via overlays • Increased need to design the cable plant correct and for a longer life • Merging of network, server, and storage teams into one

23. Thank you!