evolving trends in high performance infrastructure
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Evolving trends in high performance infrastructure

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

Evolving trends in high performance infrastructure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 65 Views
  • Uploaded on

Evolving trends in high performance infrastructure. Andrew F. Bach Chief Architect FSI – Juniper Networks. Agenda. The Need For High Performance. 5. 4. 1. 2. 3. The challenge. The limitations today . Resulting trends. Impact on Data center Infrastructure. Agenda.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Evolving trends in high performance infrastructure' - jola


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
evolving trends in high performance infrastructure

Evolving trends in high performance infrastructure

Andrew F. Bach

Chief Architect FSI – Juniper Networks

agenda
Agenda
  • The Need For High Performance

5

4

1

2

3

The challenge

The limitations today

Resulting trends

Impact on Data center Infrastructure

agenda1
Agenda
  • The Need For High Performance

5

4

1

2

3

Thechallenge

The limitations

A better solution

Junipers products and next steps

transactions become bandwidth distributed to the financial community terabits sec from opra system
Transactions become Bandwidth Distributed to the Financial Community (Terabits/Sec) from OPRA system
400 years of rapid technology adoption
400+ years of rapid technology adoption
  • And a rich history of technology innovation in markets…
      • First stock ticker to disseminate data (1867)
      • First telephones on the trading floors (1878)
      • First electronic ticker display board (1966)
      • Wireless handheld devices on Trading floors 15 years before ipad invented (1995)
      • Industry’s first private network offeringglobal connectivity
      • Industry’s private network exceeds 1TbS
agenda2
Agenda
  • The Need For Speed

5

4

1

2

3

The challenge

The limitations

A better solution

Junipers products and next steps

fss challenges
FSS Challenges
  • Regulatory model is driving change
    • Requirement for long term retention of data
    • Requirement to archive meta data
    • Real time risk management is now required
  • FSS is evolving to a commodity industry
    • Time to market must be faster
    • Product life time is shorting
    • Margins are reducing driving OPEX reduction
  • Technology adoption is continuing to accelerating to meet accelerating business needs
    • Fuel the race to the triple crown of technology (0 cost, 0 latency, 0 time to market);Technology is a strategic weapon
    • Bandwidth demand continues to grow at 30% - 50% per year.
    • Comprehensive management and orchestration of the data center
  • Fundamental new architectures are required
    • Flat Clos like architectures
    • Tightly coupled datacenter network to the wide area optical network
    • Tightly couple the Networks and the servers - SDN
slide8
A typical challenge

Gateway

Symbol routing risk management

Customer

TOR

TOR

Matching engine

CORE

CORE

TOR

TOR

CORE

CORE

TOR

TOR

TOR

TOR

Trade Plant Size:

≈ 100 Servers

≈ 1500 Ports

Grand Total ≈150.0µS

agenda3
Agenda
  • The Need For Speed

5

4

1

2

3

The challenge

The limitations today

A better solution

Junipers products and next steps

l a t e n c y r e d u c t ion t r e n ds tor
LATENCYREDUCTIONTRENDS (TOR)

2008 2010 2011 2012 2013

Ethernet is narrowingthegapto Infiniband;industrytracking to <450nsin2013

the trade off axis
THE TRADE OFF AXIS

RELIABILITY

FEATURE VELOCITY

LATENCY

SCALE

agenda4
Agenda
  • The Need For Speed

5

4

1

2

3

The challenge

The limitations

Resulting trends

Junipers products and next steps

slide14
A different approach - Distributed computing

Symbol routing embedded in TOR

Risk Management embedded in TOR

Customer

Matching engine

NIC

CORE

TOR

TOR

NIC

CORE

TOR

TOR

Trade Plant Size:

≈ 60 Servers

≈ 1000 Ports

Data pre/post processing

Grand Total ≈100.0µS Reduced by 50µS

applications embedded networking the new way to reduce latency and cost
Applications Embedded Networking – the new way to reduce latency and cost
  • The race to zero is ending
    • at about 200 – 500NS for a reasonable switch
    • Need to focus on a different approach
  • Imbed application snippets into the switching fabric
    • Lower latency
    • Eliminates servers
    • Reduces network ports
  • Imbed snippets at the control or data plane of the network
    • Application can be embedded in a VM in the switch of into a FPGA in the data path of the switch
return of the clos data center fabrics
Return of the Clos data center Fabrics

100% of all National market da runs on JNPR

All US markets distribute market data over JNPR

90% Allequity order flow

Data Center 1 Layer

Carrier Hotel

CustomerConnections

data center simplification lower cost and ease of use
Data Center Simplification Lowercost and ease of use
  • Four architectures for a data center, all the same building blocks
    • Stand alone TOR’s
    • MC-LAG
    • Virtual Chassis
    • Fabric
  • Solutions range from classic to fabric
  • All share common management support
  • All are SDN enabled and support advanced management tools and scripting
wan fss building their own private carrier networks
WAN – FSS building their own private carrier networks
  • Lease a service/cloud
    • Shared service
    • Reduced agility
    • Resiliency tested at failure time
    • Easy solution – no need for a technical staff
    • Good solution for a medium to small firm
  • Build and operate a private cloud
    • Dedicated service
    • Rapidly adaptable to meet changing requirements
    • Customer defines and validates resiliency, easing regulatory compliance
    • Needs a small skilled staff
    • Lower cost as third parties profit is removed
agenda5
Agenda
  • The Need For Speed

5

4

1

2

3

The challenge

The limitations

A better solution

Impact on the data center infrastructure

impact on compute and network
Impact on Compute and network
  • Centralize processing where you can distribute where you must
    • Processors and network switches and hitting natural limits
    • To achieve a high performance infrastructure compute resource must be distributed
    • Optimize computing in the Server, NIC(FPGA), and network Switches(VM’s and FPGA’s) – not just one place
  • Drive to Clos fabrics
    • Heavy East – West Traffic
    • Compounded Bandwidth growth > 20% per year
    • All networks become virtual
bandwidth demands
Bandwidth demands
  • Servers will be requiring 40G
  • As CPU cores increase by 2016 server bandwidth will need 40G
  • High end servers will need 100G
  • Servers at 100G will drive the need for network links of 400G and 1T
impact of sdn nfv orchestration
Impact of SDN/NFV/Orchestration
  • Manages virtual fiber plant
  • Controls the adds/moves/changes from the servers via overlays
  • Increased need to design the cable plant correct and for a longer life
  • Merging of network, server, and storage teams into one
ad