overview of the guidelines and requirements for the candidate solutions
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Overview of the Guidelines and Requirements for the Candidate Solutions

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 24

Overview of the Guidelines and Requirements for the Candidate Solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 131 Views
  • Uploaded on

Overview of the Guidelines and Requirements for the Candidate Solutions. Anthony Hollingsworth & Johannes Kaiser. Anthony Hollingsworth apologises for his absence on Tuesday, which is due to a visit of Mr. P. Weissenberg to ECMWF. Overview of Presentation.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Overview of the Guidelines and Requirements for the Candidate Solutions' - joie


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
overview of the guidelines and requirements for the candidate solutions

Overview of the Guidelines and Requirements for theCandidate Solutions

Anthony Hollingsworth & Johannes Kaiser

slide2
Anthony Hollingsworth apologises for his absence on Tuesday,

which is due to a visit of Mr. P. Weissenberg to ECMWF.

overview of presentation
Overview of Presentation
  • Introduction: Objectives, Study Logic, …
  • System Layout
  • Data Flow Characterisation
  • 2nd Workshop Conclusions
  • Questions for Today and Tomorrow
halo gmes specific support action ssa
HALO – GMES Specific Support Action (SSA)

Marine

Services

Emergency

Response

Land

Monitoring

Global

Land

Monitoring

Security

Atmospheric

Services

  • Harmonised coordination of Atmosphere, Land and Ocean integrated projects of the GMES backbone (project lifetime: 1/2/2004 – 1/1/2007)
  • GMES Fast-Track Pilot Services to be operational from 2008
    • Marine Services (IP MERSEA follow-up)
    • Land Monitoring (IP GEOLAND-Europe follow-up)
    • Emergency Response (IP RISK-PREVIEW follow-up)
  • Proposed GEMS Fast-Track Pilot Services to be operational from 2009 onwards
    • Atmospheric Services (IP GEMS follow-up)
    • Global Land Monitoring (IP GEOLAND-Global follow-up)
    • Security
  • HALO aims at formulating agreed recommendations to GAC and IPs
  • Scientific thematic analysis of links:
    • Direct product exchange
    • Unaccomplished data demands
    • Common data
  • Coordinated solutions to infra-structure in operational mode
    • Candidate solutions by Alcatel and Astrium

HALO

gmes fast track pilot services and halo
GMES Fast-Track Pilot Services and HALO

Aim of HALO: “Optimising the efficiency of interaction the Atmosphere, Ocean and Land segments by formulating agreed recommendations to A - L - O IPs and GMES steering groups in areas of”

Scientific thematic analysis and coordination

Coordinated solutions to shared problems

Recommendations to the transition to operational status

Definition of Infrastructure Candidate Solutions

Marine

Services

Emergency

Response

Land

Monitoring

HALO

Global

Land

Monitoring

Security

Atmospheric

Services

iterative development of the guidelines requirements
Iterative Development of the Guidelines (=Requirements)

MERSEA IP

Initialisation of Guideline

1

GEMS IP

GEOLAND IP

Guideline consolidation

2

3

Data flow characterisation

Definition of candidate

4

solutions

progress of the candidate solution definition
Progress of the Candidate Solution Definition

2004 Reports:

“ECMWF’s data and products for GMES”

“geoland data and products for GMES”

“MERSEA data and products for GMES”

“GEMS data and products for GMES”

2005 Reports:

“Interacting parts of GEMS, MERSEA and geoland: Data, products and infrastructure”

“HALO Guideline”

2005/2006 Draft Report:

“Infrastructure candidate solutions overview”

What data flows are expected?

draft discussed at 2nd Workshop and updated afterward

chief objectives of this meeting
Chief Objectives of this Meeting
  • Project-internal Agreement on
    • which candidate solutions shall be assessed,
    • advantages and disadvantages of each,
    • which one HALO shall recommend.
current system of ips 2006
Current System of IPs (2006)

Model

NWP

Assim.

UK-metoffice

NWP

Retrieval

OLF

Data

Mer

TOPAZ

FOAM

MFS

cator

RT

link

CSP

ONC

GEMS

Off -line

NER

m-f

Cor

CLS

link

SC

CMS

iolis

OFM

ECMWF

Geoland

GEMS

Satellite Agencies

In-situ

MERSEA

data categories used in the halo reports
Data Categories used in the HALO Reports
  • categories of exchange
    • internal: within one IP
    • interacting: between two IPs
    • external: between an IP and a third party
  • observation categories
    • in-situ
    • satellite-based
  • delivery mode
    • real-time / near-real time
    • regular
    • on-demand / offline
in situ providers for gems
In-Situ Providers for GEMS
  • CarboEurope, NOAA-CMDL, FLUXNET, ALE-GAGE-AGAGE, WDCGG data centre, WMO/GAW, WOUDC, DWD, SHADOZ, MOZAIC, DLR, IPSL, NILU, NDSC, EMEP, NILU, IMPROVE, AERONET, PHOTONS, WDCA, Brewer network, NUIG, ARM, SIRTA, NJKDSC, BSRN, SURFRAD, NASA, HELCOM, OSPAR, CREATE, DAEDALUS, GMES-GATO, Met-Monieur, AIRBASE, …
  • Is there a role for WIN and ORCHESTRA?
selected conclusions on infrastructure candidate solutions
Selected Conclusions on Infrastructure Candidate Solutions
  • need description of two alternative technical solution candidates
    • one using the existing meteorological network, ie GTS
    • another EUMETCast
    • Does WIS encompass both GTS and EUMETCast?
  • compare the two solutions:
    • commonalities and differences
    • advantages and limitations
  • Data policy implications of the two solution candidates shall be pointed out.
  • an additional HALO meeting to decide on a solution recommendation
  • separate the discussions of solutions for the operational real-time data flow and for the data access for time-lagged products like reanalyses.
ad