1 / 11

Non-discrimination

Non-discrimination. 1. Definitions. Prohibition of discrimination (negative approximation)  requirement of equal treatment Encouragement of equal opportunity  „positive discrimination”. 2. Principled sources. Theological: equality before God

joie
Download Presentation

Non-discrimination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non-discrimination

  2. 1. Definitions • Prohibition of discrimination (negative approximation)  requirement of equal treatment • Encouragement of equal opportunity  „positive discrimination”

  3. 2. Principled sources • Theological: equality before God • Secular: fundamental principle of just society – norm of Kant of equal human dignity being due to everybody Classical liberal democracy: equality before law = arbitrary non-discrimination + principle of negative freedom (Mill)  prevention of injury of other people Rawls: The theory of justness – existent social differences fair equal opportunity – not unconditionally Unjust  2 fundamental elements of justness: * certain people less for prosperity of other people = unjustness * greater preference of certain people, improvement of conditions of poor people = not unjust

  4. 3. Non-discrimination as special right • Independent right • Measure of enforcement of other rights  procedural requirement Forbidden classification: race, gender, nationality, ethnicity, religion, political opinion, social ground, origins, color, sexual orientation, age + „any other grounds” (which individual cannot influence  classical case of discrimination) Deviation from the prohibition need to be verified – tests: • Reasonable differentation standing on objective basic: if there isn’t any fundamental rights (earlier pension of miners)  rationality test • Medium-strict examination: discrimination betwen genders, positive discrimination  important state interest • The strictest test: forcing state interest  „suspicious reasons”: race, ethinicity

  5. 4. Its appearance 4.1. Mode of manifestation • Direct • Indirect (parttime) • Victimization – causing agonies 4.2. Legal documents • National: French Declaration, US Constitution (Lincoln: 13. prohibition of slavery, 14. due process, 14. general suffrage) • International: UN Charter, Universal Declaration, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ECHR Article 14 (accessorial right) + Additional Protocol 12, EU directives (2000/43, 78)

  6. 4.3. The Hungarian Constitution Article 70/A para. (1) general egalitarian formula: race, color, gender, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origins, financial situation, birth or on any other grounds not only citizens, but legal entity too, not only fundamental rights  Decision 61/1992 AB for the whole legal system Article 70/A para. (2) The law shall provide for strict punishment  Criminal Code, Civil Code, Labour Code, act on administrative procedure, act on consumer protection + Act CXXV of 2003 on equal treatment and encouragement of equal opportunity  Decision 45/2000 AB Article 70/A para. (3) measures for equal opportunity – positive discrimination is not unconstitutional (Decision 9/1990 AB) Other provisions: Articles 9 (property), 54 (dignity), 56 (legal capacity), 57 (court), 66 (man-woman), 70/B (labour), 70/I (general and proportionate sharing of taxation), 71 (suffrage) Test of MKAB: • Discrimination concerning fundamental right  necessity-proportionality test (stricter) • Concerning non-fundamental right  rationality test (Criminal Code Article 199)

  7. 5. Special fields 5.1. Discrimination on the basis of race International: • UN- 1965: All types of racial discrimination • Council of Europe - ECRI • EU - 2000/43 National • US SC - Dred Scott (1856): Plessy v. Fergusson (1896): „separate but equal”; Brown (1954): debarring of black citizenship; if separate, inherently unequal; Bakke (1978) • Hungary: Case of Góman/Tiszavasvári/Patvarc

  8. 5.2. Discrimination on the basis of gender International • UN Convenants + prohibition of discrimination against women • Council of Europe: Article 14 + Additional Protocol 7 + Social Charter • EU – labour of equal value ; ECJ:Kalanke: qouta system not, Marschall: individual quality yes; Charter of Fundamental Rights Article 23 National • US v. Virginia (1996) – military school: the strictest measure • Hungary: Decision 10/1990 AB – widow’s pension, Decision 46/1994 - women’s conscription, against men, too: Decision 7/1998 AB pension advantage to weaver; Municipial Court of Monor - Case of Profi

  9. 5.3. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation International • Council of Europe the last several decades: Article 8 – privacy  age limit of consent, army, placement of children, but adoption not • EU - directive 2000/78/EC expressly National • US - Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) • Hungary: Decision 14/1995 AB, Decision 21/1996 AB, Decision 20/1999 AB, Decision 37/2002AB rationality test + Sziget v. Tarlós

  10. 5.4. Positive discrimination International • UN: women and men • Council of Europe: nothing • EU: encouragement (see Case of Marschall) National • US: affirmative action: „inverse discrimination” on the basis of racism vs. „color-blind fundamentalism” • Hungary: unequality before the law (Heller, Gombár) Decision 9/1990 AB, but in case of fundamental rights not! Plan of Ministry of Education about entrance examination Act on non-discrimination – Drittwirkung * direct discrimination from point a) to t); indirect; persecution; illegal separation; reprisal * giving preference * authority: from 01. 02. 2005

  11. Thank you for your attention!

More Related