1 / 12

Bureaucracy and Democracy (Cont’d)

Bureaucracy and Democracy (Cont’d). January 17 th , 2005. Liberal Democracy and Bureaucracy. confluence bureaucracy is good in that it emphasis impartiality (over participation) dissonance danger is if bureaucracy becomes too powerful and threatens individual rights “Big Brother”

johnpgrant
Download Presentation

Bureaucracy and Democracy (Cont’d)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bureaucracy and Democracy (Cont’d) January 17th, 2005

  2. Liberal Democracy and Bureaucracy • confluence • bureaucracy is good in that it emphasis impartiality (over participation) • dissonance • danger is if bureaucracy becomes too powerful and threatens individual rights • “Big Brother” • imperative • make sure that bureaucracy is tightly constrained (e.g. tight rules) • subject to individual rights protection (e.g. Charter, privacy protection, FOI, etc.)

  3. Elite Democracy and Bureaucracy • confluence • top-down and hierarchical nature of bureaucracy is good • effective mechanism to pursue the general welfare • dissonance • danger if bureaucracy becomes too powerful and undermines competition among elected/political elites • e.g. development of a permanent non-elected bureaucratic elite making decisions • ultimately decisions must be ratified by elected elites • imperative • ensure that elected elites can be reasonably held accountable for decisions • ensure bureaucracy with high level of professionalism, merit and commitment to public service (while ensuring that they have adequate scope to expercise these capacities)

  4. Participatory Democracy and Bureaucracy • confluence • effective mechanism to pursue the general welfare • e.g. to put into effect the will of the majority • dissonance • top-down hierarchical nature of bureaucracy is bad • excessive focus on impartiality (over participation) is bad • imperative • ensure that bureaucracy is representative of the population • provide opportunities for democratic participation (e.g. consultations, citizen input, bottom-up initiatives) • ensure accessibility and transparency

  5. Public Administration in Canada... • the structure of the Canadian bureaucracy (and its interface with elected officials) represents a particular response to these various concerns and imperatives!! • What is that response???

  6. Part II: The Political-Bureaucratic Interface in Canada

  7. Cabinet Government • what is it? • collective sharing of executive power • how is the structure of cabinet government determined? • the Prime Minister • who becomes PM? • prerogatives of the Prime Minister (vis-a-vis cabinet) • size and structure of cabinet • departmental organization • cabinet committee structure • appointments to cabinet • cabinet agenda • cabinet decisions

  8. Principles/Roles/Actors in Cabinet Government • relationships NOT roles • not generally legally prescribed • considerable room for manoeuvre • organic link between different relationships • nature of any given relationship has implications for the nature of other relationships • change in any one set of relationships implies changes in other sets of relationships • relationships are based on tradition but also on continuing acceptance of the obligations/rights inherent in them • implicit bargains

  9. Centralized Accountability: Collective Ministerial Responsibility • what is “responsible government”? • the executive must maintain the confidence of Parliament • what is collective ministerial responsibility? • all ministers must resign if the cabinet loses the confidence of Parliament • what constitutes having the confidence of Parliament? • what pre-conditions would the operation of collective cabinet ministerial responsibility require?

  10. Centralized Accountability: Collective Ministerial Responsibility • requirements (enforced by PM) • cabinet solidarity • cabinet secrecy • cabinet documents exempt from Freedom of Information • the problem of leaks • why would cabinet ministers agree? • price of being in cabinet • collective self-interest

  11. Diffuse Accountability: Individual Ministerial Responsibility • what is individual ministerial responsibility? • do ministers typically resign for errors committed in their department? • no...not if they can help it!! • why not? • minister is answerable publicly (to parliament) for the actions of their department • regardless of whether the minister was in charge at the time a problem occurred • ministers are responsible for correcting problems within their department

  12. Diffuse Accountability: Individual Ministerial Responsibility • why would individuals agree to accept this role? • price for exercising power

More Related