E N D
1. Like concepts repel unlike concepts attract Pask’s “Last Theorem”
For ALL forces:
Gravitional, Electromagnetic, Weak and Strong nuclear force
3. The Proof outlined Consider the parallel axis spin case
(Wiener’s stable parallel self organisation case for the “attraction of frequencies”)
Gravitational case
A car stationary at the earths equator (weighs less than at a pole).
[In general a Coriolis or geostrophic force will also be exerted (off the equator) for any movement on an orbiting body. This is a natural manifestation of Pask’s third closure force of the Borromean triple.]
4. The car moves Ignoring Coriolis effects
To the West spins add and car is lighter because of increased centrifugal force
To the East spins subtract and the car is lighter because of decreased centrifugal force
Like spin or angular momentum repels
Unlike spin or angular momentum attracts
5. Spin TheoremGravitational case
6. Bohr ModelElectrostatic Attraction Case
7. The quantum Bohr model Assume gravitational attraction and no electrostatic forces. Bohr radius huge.
Using ionization energy of hydrogen atom find spin kinetic energy of electron.
Spin the electron opposite to the proton spin apply the unlike spins rule and the correct Bohr radius is produced
8. Laithwaite’s Conical PendulumThe quantum as a precession phenomenon?
9. Using Angular Momentum we unify a dynamical treatment of electromagnetic and gravitational forces No magnetic fields, North South poles etc
No electrostatic fields, positive negative charges
Just instantaneous conservation of angular momentum
No more Forces just angular momentum to account for action at a distance and instantaneous gravitational attraction as seemed implicit in Whitehead’s “Process and Reality”.
Since weak and strong nuclear forces involve transfer of momentum as per QED/QCD a similar treatment may be assumed applicable
Einstein’s dream realised?
10. Anthony Osborne and Viv Pope “An Angular Momentum Synthesis of ‘Gravitational’ and ‘Electrostatic’ Forces” Galilean Electrodynamics, Vol 14, Special Issue 1, Spring 2003, pp. 9 - 19
http://www.poams.org/lib/pub/pub_an_angular_momentum_synthesis.pdf
POAMS: 'Pope-Osborne Angular Momentum Synthesis'
Members of the ANPA Group
13. Coupling: General case
Where J is total angular momentum L is orbital and S is spin angular momentum
f is the angle between L and S, the coupling
When F= p/2 coupling is serial and weak or
decoherent. (Cf Wiener “attraction and
repulsion of frequencies”)
14. Like spins The relativistic condition
There are no doppelgangers
Likeness, faith and duration
Recursive packing: telephone cable
Unfoldment- thought
16. What’s all this Brunnian stuff?
18. The Pask Forces Diagram
19. Synchronisation Both in phase and out of phase.
Baker and Blackburn in “The Pendulum” OUP 2005 conclude
Weak driving with strong coupling=> synchronisation or coherence
Strong driving with weak coupling=>
unsynchronisation or decoherence
20. “There are no doppelgangers”Pask and Relativistic Compliance Consider a pair of hydrogen atoms as counters or clocks.
Acceleration histories of the two atoms will never be the same- even if frozen as water ice.
Time dilatation and relativistic mass or energy considerations will show at some level of precision the atomic spectra of the atoms will be different.
While coherent as eg dihydrogen their clocks will synchronise but their phase history will remain different (Thanks Tony) and the counts distinct.
Two observers (or actors) may share a context but their different perspectives guarantees the no doppelgangers theorem.
Best and worst case differences can be quantified.
21. Time is Incommensurable for Actors The Lambda matrix for actors
A matrix of matrices or a matrix of vectors?
Certainly a list of interactions for all Actor Interactions.
Thus ????x,t(j)), B(y,t(k))) represents an interaction between Actors A and B at time at actor A's time t(j).
De Zeeuw argues the vector t(n) should be matrix.
This requires all concurrent events to be coherent. An interaction produces decoherence. We ponder.
22. Conjecture A given coherent set or persisting object exerts a net parity
Coupling constants deriving from decoherence produce magnitudes
23. The unobserved and the elementary: a new classification Bogons and
Morons
24. A Coriolis-like effect of the dynamical boson-fermion interaction in the interacting boson-fermion model.
Physics Letters B, vol.199, no.4, 31 Dec. 1987, pp.482-8. Netherlands.V. Paar (Univ. Zagreb)