Gentler, Kinder Cut What’s New in Minimally invasive Colorectal Surgery? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gentler kinder cut what s new in minimally invasive colorectal surgery l.jpg
1 / 55

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Gentler, Kinder Cut What’s New in Minimally invasive Colorectal Surgery?. Samuel C. Oommen , MD, FACS, FASCRS Bay Area Colon and Rectal Surgeons Walnut Creek, Ca. Topics To be Covered. Trans anal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Laparoscopic Colectomy

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Gentler, Kinder Cut What’s New in Minimally invasive Colorectal Surgery?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Gentler kinder cut what s new in minimally invasive colorectal surgery l.jpg

Gentler, Kinder CutWhat’s New in Minimally invasive Colorectal Surgery?

Samuel C. Oommen, MD, FACS, FASCRS

Bay Area Colon and Rectal Surgeons

Walnut Creek, Ca

Topics to be covered l.jpg

Topics To be Covered

  • Trans anal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM)

  • Laparoscopic Colectomy

  • Total Mesorectal Excision & Autonomic Nerve Preservation (TME & ANP)

  • Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS)

  • Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Trans anal endoscopic microsurgery tem l.jpg

Trans anal Endoscopic Microsurgery(TEM)

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery l.jpg

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

  • Introduced by Gerhard Buess in 1983 for excision of proximal rectal lesions not amenable to a standard Transanal excision(TAE)

  • Operating Proctoscope with ports for CO2 insufflation and instrumentation

  • Six fold stereoscopic view

  • Facilitates negative surgical margins when direct visualization of the radial extent of the tumor is visible

Transanal endscopic microsurgery tem l.jpg


Indications for tem l.jpg

Indications For TEM

  • Adenocarcinoma

    T1 lesion (Confined to Submucosa)

    Well or Moderately differentiated

    Without Lympho vascular invasion

    T2 lesion (Muscle Invasion)following preop chemo radiation under ACOSOG Z 6041 protocol

  • Carcinoid(< 2 cm)

  • Adenoma unable or incompletely excised by endoscopy

  • Residual neoplasm or uncertain margin after endoscopic resection

  • Excision of benign rectal stenoses

  • Palliation of advanced cancer in high risk patients

Tem technique l.jpg


  • Proctoscopic exam

  • Isolate tumor in lower half of field of view

  • Secure scope in place with Martin Arm

Courtesy Peter Cataldo, MD

Tem technique8 l.jpg


Direct view through stereoscope or on monitor

Courtesy Peter Cataldo, MD

Technique l.jpg

Inject lesion with lidocaine w/ epinephrine


Courtesy Peter Cataldo, MD

Endoscopic view l.jpg


Slide11 l.jpg

Multifocal Dysplastic Adenoma (TEM Specimen)

Slide12 l.jpg

T1 Polypoid Cancer

TEM specimen

T2 adenocarcinoma of mid rectum l.jpg

T2 Adenocarcinoma of Mid Rectum

Tem video l.jpg


Tem for rectal cancer oncologic results l.jpg

TEM for Rectal Cancer?Oncologic Results

Tem vs radical resection winde et al munster germany l.jpg

TEM vs. Radical ResectionWinde et. al. Munster, Germany

  • Prospective, randomized trial

  • uT1N0

  • 52 patients

  • TEM vs. Ant. Resection

  • Morbidity / mortality

  • Recurrence

  • Survival

Tem vs radical resection winde et al munster germany17 l.jpg

TEM vs. Radical ResectionWinde et. al. Munster, Germany


TEM 20.8% vs. LAR 34.5%

Local recurrence

TEM 2/24(8%) vs. LAR (?)


TEM 23/24 (96%) vs. LAR 25/26 (96%)

Tem oncologic results l.jpg

TEMOncologic Results

  • LeZoche et al

  • Rome, Italy

  • 40 patients, 3 yr f/u

  • prospective, randomized trial

  • T2N0

  • Preop chemoradiotherapy

  • TEM vs LAR

Tem vs lap lar t2n0 l.jpg

TEM vs Lap LART2N0


OR time 95 min 165 min

LOS 4.5 days 7.5 days

Compl 15% 15%

Local rec. 5% 5%

3 yr. Surv. 90% 83%

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery l.jpg

Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Historical perspectives l.jpg

Historical Perspectives

  • 1990: Laparoscopic Right Colectomy- Jacobs, Miami, Florida

  • 2004: COST Study

*Jacobs M. et al Minimally Invasive Colon Resection, SurgLaparoscEndosc 1991; 1: 144-50




Benefits of laparoscopic surgery l.jpg

Benefits of Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Smaller incisions

  • Reduced postoperative pain

  • Earlier return of bowel function

  • Reduced hospital stay

  • Earlier return to work and activities of daily living

  • Reduced operative trauma and stress

  • Reduced adhesions

Endoscopic tattoo l.jpg

Endoscopic Tattoo

Right colectomy l.jpg

Right Colectomy

Right colon anatomy l.jpg

Right Colon Anatomy

Adequate lymph node harvest l.jpg

Adequate Lymph Node Harvest

Total mesorectal excision tme l.jpg

Total Mesorectal Excision(TME)

What is total mesorectal excision l.jpg

What is Total Mesorectal Excision?

“TME is defined as the resection of the rectum with its surrounding fatty and lymphatic tissue contained within the visceral sheet (Fascia Propria) of the endopelvic fascia. The dissection in this almost avascular cleavage allows the complete removal of the mesorectal tissue, as well as good protection of the hypogastric nerves and the inferior hypogastric plexus, resulting in less disturbance to bladder and sexual functions.”

Faerden AE et al, Dis Colon Rectum , 2005; 48: 2224-2231

Slide30 l.jpg

Adapted from Heald, RJ et al, Br. J. Surg Vol 69(1982)613-616

Total mesorectal excision tme31 l.jpg

Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)

Shiny Fascia Propria covering the Mesorectum

Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)

Tme grading l.jpg

TME Grading


    • Intact bulky mesorectum with a smooth surface

    • Only minor irregularities of mesorectal surface

    • No coning towards the distal margin of the specimen

    • After transverse sectioning, the circumferential margin appears smooth

Tme grading33 l.jpg

TME Grading


    • Moderate bulk to the mesorectum

    • Irregularity of the mesorectal surface with defects greater than 5 mm, but none extending to the muscularispropria

    • No areas of visibility of muscularispropria

Tme grading34 l.jpg

TME Grading


    • Little bulk to the mesorectum

    • Defects in the mesorectum down to muscularispropria

    • After transverse sectiong, the circumferential margin appears very irregular

Slide35 l.jpg

From Maslekar et al. 2006 “Mesorectal grades predict recurrences after curative resection for rectal cancer.” Dis Colon Rectum 50:168-175.

Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery l.jpg

Hand Assisted laparoscopic Surgery

  • Still the best Surgical instrument

  • Tactile feedback for retraction and dissection

  • May reduce operative times and need for conversion

  • Bridge between open and laparoscopic surgery

  • Two Commandments

Adapted from Michael McCue, MD

Two commandments of laparoscopic surgery l.jpg

Two Commandments of laparoscopic surgery.

  • “Thou Shall not change your operation to fit the equipment”

  • “Thou shall K. I. S. S. (keep it simple surgeons)”

  • HALS is ideal in meeting above criteria.

Adapted from Michael McCue, MD

Benefits of hals l.jpg

Benefits of HALS

  • Maintains Tactile Feedback

  • Improves Eye Hand coordination and Depth perception

  • Better exposure due to improved traction

  • Facilitates rapid hemorrhage control

    No Laparoscopic instrument is as versatile, educated and safe as the experienced Surgeon’s Hand

Lap disc ethicon endosurgery l.jpg

Lap Disc Ethicon Endosurgery

Hand assisted right colectomy for hepatic flexure cancer hals l.jpg

Hand Assisted Right Colectomy for Hepatic Flexure CancerHALS

Robotic colorectal surgery l.jpg

Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery l.jpg

Disadvantages of Laparoscopic surgery

  • Unstable video camera imaging

  • Dependency on assistant’s skills

Disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery45 l.jpg

Disadvantages of Laparoscopic surgery

  • Limited motion of instruments

    • The Surgical instruments are Rod-like having no wrist movement at the tip which required from the surgeon to move his arms in large scale movements outside the patients body for the instrument tip (internally) to get to the desired location.

    • The movement of the instruments/scope were awkward (counter-intuitive) meaning that if the surgeon wants to move the instrument/scope to the left, he has to move to the right from outside.

    • Related loss of dexterity

Disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery contd l.jpg

Disadvantages of Laparoscopic surgery(Contd)

  • The scope displays only a 2D image on the display which has no depth perception. The surgeon needed to over/under shoot the target anatomy to be able to allocate it properly.

  • The Surgeon gets tired

    • Awkward position such as twisting his neck to be able to follow up the surgical site displayed on the monitor.

    • Longer hours standing

Advantages of robotic surgery l.jpg

Advantages of Robotic Surgery

  • Tridimensional(3D) imaging under the surgeon’s direct control

  • Provides instruments with seven degrees of freedom

  • Enhances dexterity, precision, and control during surgical procedures.

Advantages of robotic surgery contd l.jpg

Advantages of Robotic Surgery(Contd)


  • Scales down hand movements, and eliminates hand tremors

  • Facilitates handsewn sutures.

  • Cuts down the surgeon’s fatigue

Or setup and patient preparation l.jpg

OR Setup and Patient Preparation

Patient positioning l.jpg

Patient Positioning

Docking the patient cart l.jpg

Docking The Patient Cart

Surgical steps surgical overview l.jpg

Surgical Steps - Surgical Overview

Robotic colorectal surgery53 l.jpg

Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Disadvantages of robotic surgery l.jpg

Disadvantages of Robotic Surgery

  • Cost. With a price tag of 1.6 million dollars, and nearly 100k in maintenance costs annually.

  • the size of these systems.

  • lack of compatible instruments like energy sources and staplers.

  • Lack of tactile feedback

Conclusion l.jpg


  • Generally, the maximum benefit seems to be achieved whenever a complex and precise dissection in a confined space is required.

  • Still in infancy, and many advances are expected in the near future (smaller and operative-room integrated systems, tactile feedback technology, specifically designed instruments, reduced costs)

  • Robotic laparoscopic colon surgery is feasible and safe.

  • Operating time is longer than in standard laparoscopic surgery.

  • Results from long term studies studies regarding cancer survival and recurrence are awaited

  • Login