1 / 16

ECTP Project Oversight Grantee Perspective

ECTP Project Oversight Grantee Perspective. TRB BRT Workshop July 22, 2008. Project Oversight. Risk Assessment FFGA Readiness Technical Capacity Utility Coordination Third Party Impacts. Risk Assessment. Initial assessment conducted in December 2003 Status when Risk Assessment started

jocelyn
Download Presentation

ECTP Project Oversight Grantee Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECTP Project Oversight Grantee Perspective TRB BRT Workshop July 22, 2008

  2. Project Oversight • Risk Assessment • FFGA Readiness • Technical Capacity • Utility Coordination • Third Party Impacts

  3. Risk Assessment • Initial assessment conducted in December 2003 • Status when Risk Assessment started • 60% plans and estimate completed • Vehicle acquisition ongoing • ROW acquisition just starting • 60% value engineering scheduled

  4. Risk Assessment • Conducted by PMOC with facilitation by specialty consultant. • Three two-day workshops over three month period. • PMOC Draft Risk Assessment • GCRTA Risk Mitiagtion Plan • PMOC Risk Assessment Spot Report • Six month process

  5. Risk Assessment • Initial unmitigated results • Budget $168.4 million • $169.2 – $179.8 million (10% - 90% range) • Schedule Revenue Operations Date December 2007 • June 2008 – May 2009 (10% - 90% range)

  6. Risk Mitigation Plan • One month to prepare and submit to FTA • Focused on top ten cost and top three schedule items • Additional mitigating strategies such as revising budget and/or schedule

  7. Risk Mitigation Plan

  8. Risk Mitigation Plan

  9. Risk Mitigation Plan • Mitigated Results • Budget $168.4 million • $157.2 – $169.0 million (10% - 90% range) • Schedule Revenue Operations Sept 2008 • May 2008 – April 2009 (10% - 90% range) • 80% Budget and 70% Schedule Probability • PMOC issues Final Risk Assessment

  10. Risk Mitigation Plan

  11. Risk Management Plan • GCRTA acknowledges the final finding of the Risk Assessment • Commit to adding a Risk Management Plan to our PMP • Included written plan and action register • Focused on top ten cost and top three schedule items • Action register updated monthly as part of PMOC visit and report. • Used as management tool

  12. FFGA Readiness • Progress on Risk Management monitored frequently • FTA focused on key items • Vehicle Acquisition Contract • Utility Coordination/Agreements • Contractor Interfaces (Number of Contracts/Constructability) • Project Staffing/Technical Capacity

  13. Technical Capacity • Key focus of FTA • Risk assessment showed areas of staff weakness • Hired additional in-house staff and added scope for consultant staff • Need to have best staff from supporting departments within agency

  14. Utility Coordination • 21 Private and public utilities in the project limits • City of Cleveland does not have a right-of-way ordinance governing utilities • Standard agreement with private utilities with work authorizations for specific construction contracts • We paid for relocations they paid for betterments

  15. Third Party Impacts • Cuyahoga County Duct Bank • City of Cleveland Utility Coordination • Cleveland Clinic Agreement • Adjacent Development Coordination

  16. ECTP Project Oversight Grantee Perspective TRB BRT Workshop July 22, 2008

More Related