Gunnison Sage-grouse Ecology, San Juan County Utah
Download
1 / 32

Gunnison Sage-grouse Ecology, San Juan County Utah - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 142 Views
  • Uploaded on

Gunnison Sage-grouse Ecology, San Juan County Utah . Sarah G. Lupis, Sharon Ward, and Terry A. Messmer Utah State University Extension, Jack H. Berryman Institute, & Utah’s Community-Based Conservation Program. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Bureau of Land Management

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Gunnison Sage-grouse Ecology, San Juan County Utah ' - joanna


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Gunnison Sage-grouse Ecology, San Juan County Utah

Sarah G. Lupis, Sharon Ward, and Terry A. Messmer

Utah State University Extension, Jack H. Berryman Institute, & Utah’s Community-Based Conservation Program


Utah Division of Wildlife Resources

Bureau of Land Management

Utah State University

San Juan County Extension Office

Guy Wallace

Dean Mitchell

Tammy Wallace

Doug Christiansen

Don Andrews

Fischer the dog…and others!


  • San Juan County Gunnison Sage-grouse Local Working Group (SWOG) identified the need to maintain and/or increase acreage of CRP in SJC

  • In 1998, SJC was designated a “priority conservation area” because of Gunnison Sage-grouse

  • 21,600 acres currently enrolled

  • Needed to evaluate the value of CRP

  • Little known about seasonal habitat use


Study Area (SWOG) identified the need to maintain and/or increase acreage of CRP in SJC


Study Area (SWOG) identified the need to maintain and/or increase acreage of CRP in SJC

Concentrated Use Zone

Conservation Reserve Program

Grazed CRP


Objectives (SWOG) identified the need to maintain and/or increase acreage of CRP in SJC

  • What are important seasonal habitats?

  • Do Gunnison Sage-grouse use CRP?

  • Does CRP help to achieve desired vegetation conditions?

  • What is the response of Gunnison Sage-grouse to the emergency grazing of some CRP fields?




Grazing debate briefly
Grazing Debate…briefly conditions

  • Destruction of sagebrush by bedding livestock

  • Deterioration of wet meadow habitat

  • Trampled eggs

  • Abandoned nests

Beck and Mitchell 2000


Grazing Debate…briefly conditions

  • Destruction of sagebrush by bedding livestock

  • Deterioration of wet meadow habitat

  • Trampled eggs

  • Abandoned nests

  • Stimulated forb growth

Beck and Mitchell 2000


Grazing Debate…briefly conditions

  • Destruction of sagebrush by bedding livestock

  • Deterioration of wet meadow habitat

  • Trampled eggs

  • Abandoned nests

  • Simulated forb growth

In general, little empirical evidence about sage-grouse responses to grazing.

Beck and Mitchell 2000



Use of crp
Use of CRP conditions

  • Defined a “concentrated use zone” that encompassed all bird locations

    • Considered to be “available” for all radio-collared birds

  • 31% CRP

Manley et al. 2002


Bird use sites
Bird Use Sites conditions

  • Percent cover of grasses, forbs, and shrubs using a Daubenmire frame every 2 meters.

Daubenmire 1959


Use of crp1
Use of CRP conditions

  • 14/19 hens nested (6)

  • 40% nests in CRP

  • 4 successful broods

  • 73% of brood locations in CRP


Use of crp2

Moose Peterson conditions

Use of CRP

  • 74% male locations in CRP

  • 49% broodless hen locations in CRP


Use of crp3
Use of CRP conditions

  • Sample size small but, given small population size, still somewhat representative

  • Use of CRP high (48.5%, 73.8%, 72.9%)

  • Use of CRP not significant (χ2, P 0.05) for nesting, brood-rearing, males, or broodless hens during this study


Bird use sites1
Bird Use Sites conditions

  • CRP sites used by Gunnison Sage-grouse partially met rangewide guidelines.

Gunnison Sage-grouse Rangewide Steering Committee 2005


Landscape scale habitat use
Landscape Scale Habitat Use conditions

  • CRP likely provides roosting cover and food resources

    • Alfalfa, dandelions, and other forbs

    • Insects


Emergency grazing
Emergency Grazing conditions

NRCS 2002


Emergency grazing1
Emergency Grazing conditions

  • Evaluated movement patters of radio-collared birds in area open to emergency grazing

    • 3 males

    • 2 broodless hens

    • 1 hen with a brood


Emergency grazing2
Emergency Grazing conditions

Radio-collared Males

  • 42.8% (18/42) locations were in CRP prior to grazing

  • During grazing, use of CRP decreased

    • 18.2% of locations (2/11) in Field 1

    • 37.5% of locations (3/8) in Field 4

    • No locations in Field 2 or 3


Emergency grazing3
Emergency Grazing conditions

Radio-collared

Broodless Hens

  • 56.0% (14/25) locations were in CRP prior to grazing

  • During grazing, use of CRP decreased

    • 8.3% of locations (1/12) in Field 1

    • 5.3% of locations (1/19) in Field 2

    • No locations in Field 3 or 4


Emergency grazing4

Before Emergency Grazing conditions

During and After Emergency Grazing

Emergency Grazing

  • Hen and brood did not exhibit avoidance

  • 50% of locations in CRP before grazing

  • 72.7% (8/11) locations in CRP during and after grazing.


Emergency grazing5
Emergency Grazing conditions

  • Vegetation at brood use sites prior to and during/after emergency grazing.

    • Less grass cover

    • Less shrub cover

    • Greater forb cover

    • Similar litter cover


Emergency grazing6
Emergency Grazing conditions

  • Most radio-collared birds showed some avoidance of grazed CRP

  • Hen with a brood was most tolerant

  • Some indication that brood use shifted from grass to shrub dominated as grasses were reduced

  • Returned to grazed fields in subsequent years


Winter habitat use
Winter Habitat Use conditions

  • 29 birds monitored during 2002-2004 winters

  • Most locations in black sagebrush and (52%) big sagebrush/CRP (25%)

  • Home range less than 4 sq. km

  • Flock size 2-30 plus birds


Conclusions
Conclusions conditions

  • CRP in San Juan County provides crucial breeding and summer habitat for Gunnison Sage-grouse

  • CRP partially meets guidelines for desired breeding/summer conditions

  • Most radio-collared Gunnison Sage-grouse exhibited short-term avoidance of livestock grazing

  • Black sagebrush and big sagebrush/CRP important winter habitat


Recommendations
Recommendations conditions

Maintain current enrollment in CRP

Sagebrush plantings

Wet meadow development

Winter habitat protection


Questions? conditions

For more information:

Utah’s Community-Based Conservation Program:

www.utahcbcp.org


ad