1 / 13

Introduction to the COST Grant System October 2009 Magali POINOT – Legal Affairs

Introduction to the COST Grant System October 2009 Magali POINOT – Legal Affairs. Preliminary remarks. As today Micro centralized management system (“pay-as-you-go”). What is the COST Grant System (CGS)? Devolution of scientific and financial coordination / administration to COST Actions

Download Presentation

Introduction to the COST Grant System October 2009 Magali POINOT – Legal Affairs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to the COST Grant System October 2009 Magali POINOT – Legal Affairs

  2. Preliminary remarks • As today • Micro centralized management system (“pay-as-you-go”) • What is the COST Grant System (CGS)? • Devolution of scientific and financial coordination / administration to COST Actions • COST Actions will be enabled to actually fund their activities directly in line with the work plan and the related budget approved by the Action Management Committee (MC) • Support for the MC will be provided by the Grant Holder (COST doc 270/07) • Brief history • Used by the ICT domain (and some volunteer Actions in 3 other COST Domains)for a number of years • Reform recommended both by the Bush Report (2002) and by the High Level Panel for the mid-term review of the ESF-EC contract for COST (2005) • Agreed by the CSO in June 2006 to endorse the introduction of a grant system for all COST Actions

  3. Preliminary remarks • Objectives • To provide more flexibility within each COST Action • To strengthen the role of the MC and the Action Chair • To speed decisions / reimbursements • To provide a better overview on the financial situation for each COST Action • Timetable • The entire migration process is expected to be accomplished by the mid 2011 • New COST Actions will automatically be managed under the CGS • On-going COST Actions will apply the CGS according to a transition plan (on the minimum basis of one Action / Domain / month) • Ending COST Actions (before 1st June 2011) will not be obliged to move to the CGS 2

  4. Boundary conditions Process Kick-off meeting (or MC meeting) of the COST Action  Selection of the Grant Holder from one of the institutions of the MC members  Annual Work Plan and Budget Plan negotiated between and agreed by the Action Chair, acting on behalf of the MC, and the COST Office, based on MC decisions  COST Grant Agreement prepared by the COST Office, and to be signed by the Grant Holder  Implementation of the COST Action’s activities based on MC decisions • Terms of references • Detailed annual Work and Budget Plans of the COST Action • COST Vademecum CGS (principles and reimbursement rules of COST financial instruments) • COST Grant Agreement • EC rules (e.g. audits and controls) • Grant Management Tool (e-COST) and User Manuals

  5. The Work and Budget Plans • Boundary conditions and Process • Detailed annual plans (see templates) • Prepared by the Action Chair following MC decisions • To be approved by the COST Office (-> negotiation takes into account activities foreseen and budgetary constraints) • Basis for the COST Grant Agreement and the implementation of the COST Action’s activities • Content and Structure • Summary of the COST Action profile -> Domain, Title, Chair, Start and End Dates, Signatories countries, non-COST participating institutions, MC members, Working Groups, etc. • Budget Plan • Meetings -> title, location, date, number of participants to be reimbursed, travel costs, organisational support • Short-Term Scientific Missions -> number, costs • Training Schools -> location, date, number of trainees/trainers to be reimbursed, trainees grants, travel costs, organisational support • Dissemination (including website, publications, outreach activities) -> title, costs • Financial and scientific administration and coordination (i.e. contribution to the Grant Holder) -> maximum percentage and amount • Work Plan -> Objectives, Activities, Annual outputs planned

  6. The Grant Holder • Boundary conditions (COST doc 270/07) • Legal entity appointed by the MC … • … from one of the institutions of the MC members … • … with appropriate competence in administrative and financial matters … • … ideally experienced in management of transnational projects / in COST • Role and responsibilities • Responsible for providing the financial and scientific administration and coordinationof the COST Action in accordance with the COST rules • Practically speaking, the core tasks are: • managing the grant for the funding of the activities of the COST Action • providing scientific and administrative secretarial support to meetings (e.g. MC, WG) • ensuring scientific coordination & liaison vis-à-vis the COST Office • providing support for publication & dissemination (including website) • scientific and financial reporting • any scientific coordination activities as decided by the MC • Financial support • Contribution of up to 15% of the actual science expenditures of the COST Action

  7. The MC members in the CGS • The Action Chair & Vice Chair • They are elected by the MC among its members for the duration of the COST Action • The Action Chair chairs the Management Committee and represents the COST Action • In case the institution of the Action Chair Institution becomes the Grant Holder, the related COST Action should be represented by the Vice-Chair from a financial point of view • The Action Financial Rapporteurs • Two MC members appointed by the MC among its members • They are responsible for drawing up a short statement on the outcome of the financial review (see template) one month after the end of the Grant Period • Practically speaking, they have to verify that the nature, the overall justification and the level of expenditure are in line with the agreed Work Plan • Code of Conduct policy (COST doc. 236/06) • Any conflict of interests shall be avoided between the Action Chair, the 2 Financial Rapporteurs and the Grant Holder • Aim to ensure the objectivity and independence of any decision / statement to be taken during the COST Action, especially on financial issues 6

  8. The COST Grant Agreement • Preliminary remarks • Revised in August/October 2008 • Taking into consideration of comments and questions raised by Grant Holders • With the involvement of all COST users: • additional feedback requested • working group • Taking into account the new requirements of: • the ESF-EC grant agreement (June 2007) concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme, and • the Financial Regulation (last revised in December 2007) and its Implementing Rules (last revised in February 2008) applicable to the general budget of the European Communities • which COST is obliged to respect

  9. The COST Grant Agreement Main Highlights • Four years rolling contract • Signed by the Grant Holder => representative of the legal entity! • Annual work and budget plans • Annual instalments • up to 65% at the start of the annual period • up to 35% on request & if needed • Reimbursement of eligible costs (e.g. VAT excluded) • Intermediate and final financial reporting, including financial and scientific administration / coordination tasks • 31 December • end of the annual period • Application of the ‘four eyes’ principle • Grant Holder’s Financial Officer • Action Financial Rapporteurs appointed by the MC • COST Office • ESF • Possible controls and audits • COST/ESF, EC, Court of Auditors • 5 years after the end of the ESF-EC grant agreement • Annual scientific reporting

  10. The Grant Management Tool (e-COST) • What is it? • Web-based IT platform … • … for the management of COST Action (activities, grant, reporting …) • Main functionalities • Provides for individual account for each Grant Holder (username and password following registration) • Constitutes a secured data basis (easy way to build list of participants and send invitations) • Ensures follow-up of deviations and updates of the financial status for each COST Action • Allows COST staff to monitor the COST Action on a day-to-day basis • Contains contextual help pages (+ online user guides) • Training sessions organised by the COST Office • Helpdesk via ecost@cost.esf.org • Timetable • Phase 1 is operational from 9 September 2009 (-> travel & subsistence, local organiser support, contact mailing lists) • Phase 2 is operational from 9 October 2009 (-> remaining COST instruments except dissemination) • Phase 3 is fixed on 12 November 2009 (-> dissemination instrument, work plan, budget plan, COST grant agreement, reporting) 9

  11. e-COST 10

  12. Supporting tools and documents e-COST https://www.cost.esf.org/e-cost/ COST Vademecum “COST Grant System” http://www.cost.esf.org/participate/guidelines COST Grant Agreement http://www.cost.esf.org/participate/guidelines ESF-EC grant agreement http://www.cost.esf.org/about_cost/structure

  13. www.cost.esf.org Thank you for your attention!

More Related