1 / 17

IEEE 802.15 Working Group Closing Report - TG3 July 2000

This report summarizes the results of the September interim meeting of the IEEE 802.15 TG3 working group for wireless personal area networks (WPANs). It discusses the goals and agenda for the meeting, as well as plans for future meetings and the process for selecting a final MAC/PHY.

jleonora
Download Presentation

IEEE 802.15 Working Group Closing Report - TG3 July 2000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3 Closing Report Jul00] Date Submitted: [21Sept00] Source: [John Barr/Jim Allen] Company [Motorola/Kodak] Address [1750 E. Golf Road, Schuamburg, IL 60173] Voice:[+1 847 576-8706], FAX: [+1 847 538-4253], E-Mail:[John.Barr@Motorola.com] Re: [00253R1P802-15_TG3-High-Rate-Agenda-Sept00.xls] Abstract: [TG3 Chair Report to 802.15 WG] Purpose: [TG3 chair report to WG to update them on September interim meeting results.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by 802.15. John Barr, Motorola

  2. 802.15 IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks TG3 Closing Report September 2000, Scottsdale, AZ USA John Barr, Motorola

  3. Goals of the September Meeting • Summarize conference calls • Review work letter ballots to date. • Resolve remainig MAC/PHY/System evaluation process.(10:30 Wednesday) • Reduce possible options by at least 50%. (4 PM Wednesday) • Results of vote (8AM Thursday) • Determine how to reach consensus selection of final MAC/PHY. (Thursday) • Identify NOV00 Objectives (Thursday) John Barr, Motorola

  4. Modified Agenda • The agenda has been modified to reflect the TG’s consensus opinion that more work is necessary before the first 50% vote. No vote this week. • 00253r4P802.15_TG3 • Wed PM and Thursday will focus on PHY criteria clarification • Friday AM will be a Systems meeting to discuss the system interfaces • The reduction to one PHY/MAC is targeted to happen in November 2000 after final presentations. John Barr, Motorola

  5. November Meeting Goals • ConCalls: Focus on updates from subcommittees, narrow choices to 1 . Look for ways to improve performance of proposals. • November 6-10, Tampa, FL USA, Hyatt Regency, 802 Plenary Meeting. • Summarize Con. Call results & Straw vote on acceptance of work • Summary presentations • Vote to Reduce to one MAC/PHY • Organize the writing of the Draft Standard • Review interfaces between MAC/PHY etc. • Review the BSIG / IEEE contract status John Barr, Motorola

  6. November Meeting Format • Sunday - Committee Ad Hoc Work (to be scheduled) • Monday • Reports from the chairs • Process review • Presentations • Tuesday, Wed, Thursday • Presentations • Reduction Vote • Panel Discussions • Reduction Vote….. John Barr, Motorola

  7. Motion #1 • That supporting documentation for the proposals be submitted to J Barr, J Allen, I Gifford, R Alfvin and the committee chairs with notification to the TG3 reflector on or before 5 PM PST on the 27 October, 2000. • TG3 Vote was No opposition - motion passed • Moved; Allen Second: Gilb Yes/No/Abstain: John Barr, Motorola

  8. Motion #2 • That all modifications to proposals, merged proposals, and all final presentations for the November Plenary Session be sent to J Barr, J Allen, I Gifford, R Alfvin and the subcommittee chairs with notification to the TG3 reflector on or before 5 PM PT on the 27 October, 2000. These will be the proposal presentations given at the November 2000 plenary session. • Moved: Allen Second: DuVal Yes/No/Abstain: 15/0/0 John Barr, Motorola

  9. Motion #3 • The selection of a PHY for TG3 shall be: • a) by roll call vote, to vote for one proposal or “none of the above” • b) the proposal (or proposals in case of a "tie") receiving the least votes is eliminated • c) the process continues with a vote as in "a" and "b" eliminating proposals • motion continued on next page John Barr, Motorola

  10. d) that when one proposal is left, there shall be a roll call vote either in favor of the proposal or for none of the above. The proposal shall be required to achieve a 75% majority in order to be submitted to the working group as a recommendation. If the remaining proposal fails to achieve a 75% majority, the members who voted "no" shall be requested to state why they voted no and what would be required to change their vote to an affirmative vote. The proposer shall have an opportunity to respond to the concerns of the no voters. After which a roll call vote will be taken to approve the proposal. • e) if the last remaining proposal fails to receive 75% majority, the process shall begin with the proposals remaining after at least 50% were eliminated. (e.g. 50% of 7 becomes 3). • Moved: Allen Second: Gilb Yes/No/Abstain:12/0/3 John Barr, Motorola

  11. Motion #4 • That the MAC follows the same process as described for the PHY . TG3 Vote was No opposition - motion passed • Moved: Allen Second: Alfvin Yes/No/Abstain:13/0/2 John Barr, Motorola

  12. Motion #5 • That for each time the number of proposals in the eliminating process for either the MAC or PHY has been reduced to four and two, that a panel discussion shall be held with the remaining proposers as panel members. The length of discussion shall be limited to 15 minutes times the number of remaining proposals. Discussion shall be limited to voting members and the presenters or their designee. • Moved: Allen Second: Alfvin Yes/No/Abstain:13/0/2 John Barr, Motorola

  13. Motion #6 • That the presentation of each of the proposals shall not exceed 30 minutes and that the combination of presentation and discussion for each of the proposals be limited to 45 minutes. Discussion shall be limited to voting members and the presenters or their designee. • (Requires 2/3rds) • Moved: Allen Second: Gilb Yes/No/Abstain: 15/0/0/ John Barr, Motorola

  14. September Document Summary (1 of 3) John Barr, Motorola

  15. September Document Summary (2 of 3) John Barr, Motorola

  16. September Document Summary (3 of 3) John Barr, Motorola

  17. Teleconference Calls • None Next week • Three teams: • System – Mary DuVal - Email/TBD • PHY – James Gilb - Thursdays/Email • MAC – Allen Heberling - Tuesday/Email • Times, Agendas (to accommodate international participants) will be announced via email John Barr, Motorola

More Related