1 / 12

Standardised Clients – the HKU Experience

Standardised Clients – the HKU Experience. Julienne Jen 16 August 2017 @ ANU. Why Standardised Clients (“SCs”)?. Context – SCs used in our Postgraduate Certificate in Laws (“PCLL”) course Skills-based course Students training to be trainee solicitors or pupil barristers

jkelley
Download Presentation

Standardised Clients – the HKU Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Standardised Clients – the HKU Experience Julienne Jen 16 August 2017 @ ANU

  2. Why Standardised Clients (“SCs”)? • Context – SCs used in our Postgraduate Certificate in Laws (“PCLL”) course • Skills-based course • Students training to be trainee solicitors or pupil barristers • Monitored by the profession • How was it done before the SC Interviewing Programme (“SCIP”) was introduced? • Tutors role-played the client • Tutor feedback or peer feedback • Problems – unrealistic scenario; inconsistent role-play; constructive feedback???

  3. How? – in terms of curriculum • HKU PCLL course – 2 semesters • Core (in the 1st semester of the full-time programme or year 1 of the part-time programme) • Civil Litigation, Criminal Litigation, Corporate & Commercial Transactions 1; Property Transactions 1; Professional Conduct and Management • Electives (in the 2nd semester of the full-time programme or year 2 of the part-time programme) • E.g. Listed Companies; Commercial Disputes Resolution; Wills, Trust and Estate Planning; Employment Law & Practice; Matrimonial Procedure & Practice; Personal Injuries; Trial Advocacy;…etc • In what course should we introduce the SCIP? • Core or elective? Transactional or litigation-based course? • In what stage of the course should we introduce SCIP? • Towards the beginning of the PCLL year or towards the end? • Should students get some practice first? • Should students be assessed? • Small-stakes vs high-stakes assessment

  4. What we did at HKU (1) • 2012-2013: • Staff received training • Introduced it in the Will, Trust and Estate Planning Elective (“WTEP”) – around 30-40 students • Students conducted the initial interview for a client who was planning to make a will • Exercise and assessment (small stakes) • 2013-2014: • Introduced it to Civil Litigation – around 340 students – the whole student cohort took part • In November, students would interview a witness on their case file. Students had been working on this file since September • Exercise only • In the second semester, it was continued in WTEP

  5. What we did at HKU (2) • 2014 – 2015: • All students took part in the witness interview in the Civil Litigation Core course • WTEP continued to offer this but this time, the interviews would be conducted in Cantonese (with a small number of English interviews still being carried out for students who were not able to conduct the interview in Cantonese) • It was introduced in the Employment Law & Practice Elective (“ELP”) (around 100 students) • Students conducted an initial interview of a client who suffered from injuries at work • Assessment (25%) • 2015-2016: • Apart from the above, it was introduced to Use of Chinese in Legal Practice (around 15-20 students). The interviews were conducted in Cantonese • 2016-2017 – same as 2015-2016 • 2017-2018 – same as 2015-2016, except for Civil Litigation, the SCIP will account for 5% of the marks in the subject

  6. How? – in terms of preparing the students • Teaching structure of our PCLL course: • Preview in LGs • Practice in Focused Exercises in LGs • Practice in SGs & homework assignments • Review in LG • Preview by: • Lecture on interviewing skills generally • Explain what the SCIP is about • Going through the criteria with the students and explaining the “scoring” system • Video demonstration – highlighting areas of good practices • Going through the preparation required in the specific case scenario • Practice • Review • Common areas which required improvement • Areas which students did well in • Self-reflection • Reviewing their video • Reviewing their comments’ sheets

  7. Who? • Since clients can come from any walks of life, can we just randomly pick anyone off the streets to become SCS? • What skills are required to be an SC? • Interested, common sense, creative, responsible, articulate • Would an SC require any legal training beforehand? • Any specific language requirement? • Where do we recruit our SCs? • How do we maintain our SC pool?

  8. Timeline (Term time: September to December; January to May) • 1st 2 weeks of November • SC training - new vs. experienced SCs • Student training • Mid-November – SCIP exercise in Civil Litigation (around 340 students) and feedback thereafter • January – SC training for WTEP exercise and assessment on 2 separate occasions (around 30-40 students) • February – WTEP exercise and assessment • April – SC training for ELP (around 100 students), followed by the assessment in ELP • Note: invitations to SC pool sent around 3-4 weeks before the training sessions

  9. Considerations • Which course? • Who is interested to do it? • Can you embody it into existing curriculum? • Student numbers • Timetabling • Venue • Facilities • Finance • Human resources • Research • Administer questionnaires and surveys about the experience from the outset • Keep track of the empirical data

  10. Research value of standardized clients • Pedagogical research • Value in professional legal education • Comparing students performance over time, across different subjects, under different fact-scenario, course design and case files. • Interdisciplinary law research • Law and language, law and culture, law and gender : what factors have impact over students’ communicative competence ? • Initial findings - gender, language used in interviews have statistically significant relationship (see slides 11 and 12) • Further research – other background such as undergraduate degree, ethnic origin, career aspiration (solicitor/barrister), age, study mode (part time, full time), etc… a lot to be carried out either uni-jurisdictionally or across jurisdictions

  11. Example – gender. Women talk better? Database: 2013-14, 14-15, 15-16 HKU PCLL Civil litigation SC interviews ; differences in red are statistically significant

  12. Example – second language issue. Why use English (2nd language)

More Related