National labor relations board
Download
1 / 17

National Labor Relations Board - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 136 Views
  • Uploaded on

National Labor Relations Board. National 5-member board Staggered 5 year terms Presidential nominees Senate approval Tradition: mix of Republicans and Democrats, majority reflecting party of the President General Counsel 4-year term Same approval 35 Regional Offices

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'National Labor Relations Board' - jirair


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
National labor relations board
National Labor Relations Board

  • National

    • 5-member board

      • Staggered 5 year terms

      • Presidential nominees

      • Senate approval

      • Tradition: mix of Republicans and Democrats, majority reflecting party of the President

    • General Counsel

      • 4-year term

      • Same approval

    • 35 Regional Offices

      • Director appointed by NLRB

      • Staff are permanent


Division of responsibilities between the national and regional offices
Division of Responsibilities between the national and regional offices

  • 25,000 cases per year

    • 75% brought by employees, unions

    • 25% brought by employers

  • 97% resolved before NLRB national decides

    • Most of business conducted at the regional level


Example of the nlrb process

Example of the NLRB Process regional offices

O’Connell, JLR, (Fall 2001)


Union Complaint regional offices

Firm Responds

Settle

Take charge to Regional Board

Rejects Complaint

Finds cause

Firm voluntarily

settles

Firm charged

Accepts discipline

Firm charged,

Appeals

Federal Court

of Appeals

Administrative Law

Judge, can

appeal to NLRB

Loser appeals

Finds for Firm

Loser accepts

Finds for Union


After the complaint resolved
After the complaint resolved regional offices

  • Regional compliance officer oversees adherence

  • If parties in violation, back to federal court

  • Continued violation—contempt of court

  • Note: If taken to the final appeals—can take 1-3 years to resolve dispute. Additional delays possible

    • JP Stevens, ~25 years, $1.3 million in back pay

    • Milliken & Co. ~25 years, $5 million in back pay

    • Average back pay fine $2,733/worker (Kleiner, JLR (2001))

      • Fines may be cheaper than cost of compliance


Other methods to resolve disputes
Other methods to resolve disputes regional offices

  • 10(J) Court injunctions

    • Upon issuance of a ULP complaint, NLRB can petition for a restraining order from U.S. district court within whose jurisdiction the ULP occurred

      • NLRB must demonstrate that the ULP will cause irreparable harm to aggrieved party


Other methods to resolve disputes1
Other methods to resolve disputes regional offices

  • Voluntary settlements

    • NLRB encourages: adds information on expected outcomes

    • Will honor voluntary agreements between parties even if terms differ from NLRB expectations, provided

      • Reasonable

      • Freely entered

      • Party is not a repeat violator or noncompliant


Political interference with the nlrb
Political interference with the NLRB regional offices

  • Appointment and Confirmation (mimics process for federal judges)

    • Contentious since 1979

    • Below full complement about half of the time (only 3 needed for decisions)

    • Recess appointments


Political interference with the nlrb1
Political interference with the NLRB regional offices

  • Appropriations and legislation increasing or limiting NLRB actions

    Contentious since 1996

    Use of 10(j) injunctions on complaints from “salts”

    Use of “single-facility” bargaining rule—bargaining unit can be defined as a single site if it is at least one mile from other sites and has an assigned supervisor


Political interference with the nlrb2
Political interference with the NLRB regional offices

  • 10(J) injunctions issued

    • 1995 109

    • 1996 59

    • 1997 62

    • 1998 53

    • 1999 58

  • 1998: NLRB withdraws “single-facility” rule


Political interference with the nlrb3
Political interference with the NLRB regional offices

  • Congressional Oversight and Investigations (Harassment?)

    Letter from Representatives Shays and Hoekstra to Chairman Gould, March 4, 1997

    In the documentation you provided regarding your travel to San Francisco, there is a copy of your letter to ‘Dusty’ in which you state, “ Many thanks for the seats….Again, congratulations on the contract! I am so pleased for you, for the team and the city.”

    Please identify ‘Dusty’ by gender, position and relationship to the San Francisco Giants, if any.


Political interference with the nlrb4
Political interference with the NLRB regional offices

  • Letter from Gould, April 1, 1997

    “Dusty Baker is a male. He is the manager of the San Franciso Giants, and in that connection, his relationship to he Giants is a prominent and important one.”


Political interference with the nlrb5
Political interference with the NLRB regional offices

  • Direct interference

    Efforts to influence decisions on actions affecting constituents

    This would be considered unethical in Federal court—amicus briefs are ok


Political interference with the nlrb6
Political interference with the NLRB regional offices

  • Does party affiliation matter, especially with 5-year terms rather than lifetime?

    • Many cases are routine

      • Role of precedent

      • Study: 80% of cases decided the same regardless of party affiliation

      • Role of Federal Appeals Court

    • LeRoy data on ULP vs Economic Strikes

      • 535 cases between 1938-1999

    • Most of the business at the regional level


Disposition of cases at the regional level
Disposition of cases at the regional level regional offices

  • O’Connell on regional cases

    • If regions consistently implement national policy, incentive to settle at lower level

    • If regions have own agenda that never varies, also possible to encourage early settlement

    • If uncertainty about disposition of case upon appeal, incentive to settle is reduced


Is the nlrb still relevant
Is the NLRB Still Relevant? regional offices

LeRoy, JLR (Fall 2001)

  • M.B. Sturgis (2000) Temporary employees are eligible for inclusion in bargaining units

  • Epilepsy Foundation of NE Ohio (2001) right to have a co-worker or representative present in a disciplinary meeting with nonunion employers and employees.

  • Electromation (1992) firm use of action teams composed of workers and managers ruled as a de facto company union in violation of NLRA.

  • Many labor disputes now settled outside the NLRB framework—question of whether dispute involves individual vs. collective rights


Conclusions
Conclusions regional offices

  • NLRB actions controversial subject to political influence

  • Some mixed evidence that party in power influences decisions

  • Most decisions noncontroversial, settled at regional level, settled voluntarily

  • Consistency encourages settlements—evidence suggests that settlements are common

  • NLRB helps to encourage collective bargaining by imposing outcomes only rarely

  • NLRB enforcement, sanctions may be too slow and weak to force recalcitrant firms to comply


ad