Equity spring 2012
Download
1 / 12

Equity Spring 2012 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on

Equity Spring 2012. “Constructive Trusts”. In A Single Sentence. Constructive Trust: Equity Creates A Fictional Trust Based Upon Wrongdoing Or Breach Of Confidential Relationship To Prevent Injustice. Sharp v. Kosmalski, 351 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 1976).

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Equity Spring 2012 ' - jinelle-taylor


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Equity spring 2012

Equity Spring 2012

“Constructive Trusts”


In a single sentence
In A Single Sentence

  • Constructive Trust:

  • Equity Creates A Fictional Trust Based Upon Wrongdoing Or Breach Of Confidential Relationship To Prevent Injustice


Sharp v kosmalski 351 n e 2d 721 n y 1976
Sharp v. Kosmalski,351 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 1976)

  • Plaintiff commenced an equitable action to impose a constructive trust upon property that he gave to the defendant as a gift.

  • Wife had just recently died


Why does the court go out of its way to describe the plaintiff
Why Does the Court Go Out of Its Way To Describe the Plaintiff?

  • Q: Who Is the Plaintiff?

  • A: 56 Year Old Dairy Farmer Whose Wife has just recently passed away (married for 32 years) and he has only 8th grade education. What is the Court driving at? Why are these facts relevant in Equity?


Sharp v jean c kosmalski continued
Sharp v. Jean C. Kosmalski Plaintiff?Continued

  • Q: Who Is The Defendant?

  • A: 40 Year Old Close Personal Friend

  • Facts: P asked D to marry him; She refused. He constantly gave her gifts to see if she would change her mind. She ended up with title to his farm & bank accounts & house & all his property

  • Then: She turned around and evicted him -- Leaving him with $300 to his name.


Proving a constructive trust in the swell state of new york
Proving A Constructive Trust In The Swell State of New York Plaintiff?

  • 1. A confidential or fiduciary relation

  • 2. A promise

  • 3. A transfer in reliance thereon

  • 4. Resulting in Unjust Enrichment


Court s conclusion
Court’s Conclusion: Plaintiff?

  • This case seems to present the classic example of a situation where equity should intervene

  • It was for just this type of case that there evolved equitable principles and remedies to prevent injustices.


Classic constructive trust cases in south carolina
Classic Constructive Trust Cases in South Carolina Plaintiff?

  • Chapman v. Citizens and Southern Nat. Bank of South   302 S.C. 469, 395 S.E.2d 446S.C.App.,1990. Jul 23, 1990


Chapman in three easy lessons
Chapman: Plaintiff?In Three Easy Lessons

  • 1. Words Can Be Found To Promises

  • 2. Confidential Relationship Is Flexible

  • 3. Fraud Does Not Always Mean Nine Elements of a Legal Fraud


Chapman words can be promises
Chapman: Plaintiff?Words can be Promises

  • Wife's words, when husband made his will, where wife agreed to make gifts of marital property to husband's children or not to exercise power of appointment at husband's death were promises for purposes of determining whether confidential relationship existed and whether constructive trust should be imposed


Chapman confidential relationship
Chapman: Confidential Relationship Plaintiff?

  • Confidential or fiduciary relationship exists when one reposes special confidence in another so that latter, in equity and good conscience, is bound to act in good faith and with due regard to interest of one reposing confidence.


Chapman fraud is not always legal fraud
Chapman: Fraud is not always legal fraud Plaintiff?

  • Fraud, within meaning of constructive trust theory, is generally reprehensible conduct and not misrepresentation of facts.


ad