1 / 29

Analysis of the centromere organization in the nucleus of human stem cells

Analysis of the centromere organization in the nucleus of human stem cells. Egge van der Poel Bachelor Student TU Delft. Contents. Aim and Relevance Materials Methods Results. Aim and Relevance. To write an algorithm to analyze the 3D-distribution of centromeres. Aim and Relevance. ?.

jhoover
Download Presentation

Analysis of the centromere organization in the nucleus of human stem cells

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis of the centromere organization in the nucleus of human stem cells Egge van der PoelBachelor Student TU Delft

  2. Contents • Aim and Relevance • Materials • Methods • Results

  3. Aim and Relevance • To write an algorithm to analyze the 3D-distribution of centromeres

  4. Aim and Relevance ? ?

  5. Materials • Obtaining specimen: human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) expressing CenPA-GFP • Imaging: confocal microscope; allowing stepping through a cell creating a series of 2D-images • Analysis: Matlab DipImage Teloview • Writing algorithm as a Matlab file (.m-file)

  6. Methods • Data collection with Teloview • Segmentation: thresholding • Noise removal: erosion & dilation • Obtaining coordinates of centromeres • Calculating distances to center of mass • Obtaining distribution • Plot: distribution-histogram and 3D cell-representation

  7. Methods 2. Segmentation: thresholding

  8. Methods • Three threshold-methods • Isodata • Triangle • Twice Averagethreshold value = 2*(average intensity of image)

  9. Methods • Isodata: iterative technique • set threshold value T0 • calculate mean of ‘background’ (MB) and ‘objects’ (MO) • calculate mean of total (i.e. MB and MO) (MT) • compare MT with T0: if MT is not equal to T0 set new treshold value T1 = MT and start over • Repeat untill the mean of total is equal to threshold value

  10. Methods • Triangle: not iterative, starts with histogram of image

  11. Methods • Noise removalwe assume ‘centromeres’ are larger than ‘noise’ and want to dispose of the small noise objects  this assumption is okay for good quality images (where size ‘noise’ << size ‘centromeres’) • Binary erosion: converts a binary ‘1’ to a binary ‘0’ if this ‘1’ is connected, in a way specified by the connectivity, to a binary ‘0’This erodes out the smaller objects and can be repeated to erode out increasingly large objects  Small objects are out but large objects are smaller than before

  12. Methods • Binary dilation (opposite of binary erosion):converts a binary ‘0’ to a binary ‘1’ if this ‘0’ is connected, in a way specified by the connectivity, to a binary ‘1’Restores the ‘centromeres’ to their original sizeConnectivity?2D: 4-connected vs 8-connected (figure)3D: 6-connected vs 26-connected

  13. Methods • An extra erosion step (followed by an extra dilation step) can be taken by the user to increase the strictness of the algorithm

  14. Methods • Obtaining coordinates of centromeres • Measuring coordinates of centromeres: the function measure available in DipImage finds voxelsize and coordinates of the centromeres • Calculating center of mass:

  15. Methods • Calculating new coordinates, relative to center of mass • Normalization of new coordinatesWhy? Shape of nucleus is more an ellipsoid than a sphere; without normalization the calculation of the distance would ‘neglect’ the z-coordinate (<< x- and y-coordinate):

  16. Methods How? Normalization factor (di) is different for two cases • No lamin taken into account: di = standard deviation of i-coordinates • With lamin taken into account:edges of lamin are detecteddi = ½ * (maximum of i-edge - minimum of i-edge)  After normalization all axes are weighed equally

  17. Methods Note on approximation with lamin taken into account: on average, underestimates and overestimates of distances cancel (di=) Ri = estimated ellipsoid radius of i-axis

  18. Methods • Calculating distances to center of mass • Obtaining distributionthe resulting distances are divided into an amount of classes (shells with increasing radius) specified by the usermaximum distance = without lamin: distance of most outwards orientated centromere with lamin: radius of normalized (spherical) nucleus = 1

  19. Methods The number of centromeres per class (shell) is counted this number is then divided by the volume of the class to obtain the number of centromeres per unit volume, nthe relative frequency, nrel, of this last number is what is plotted in the distribution histogram

  20. Methods • Plot: distribution-histogram

  21. Methods • Plot: 3D cell-representation

  22. Methods • Finally the data is written to ‘results_centromeres’* in the Matlab working directory or directly written in a matrix in Matlab* file extension can be chosen .txt or .xls • Data = [ID-tag voxelsize x-coord y-coord z-coord distance]

  23. Methods • Data collection with Teloview • Segmentation: thresholding • Noise removal: erosion & dilation • Obtaining coordinates of centromeres • Calculating distances to center of mass • Obtaining distribution • Plot: distribution-histogram and 3D cell-representation

  24. Results • Without lamin taken into account + change in orientation of distribution is visible ̶ distribution does not show relation to the edge of the nucleus • With lamin taken into account + orientation can be related to the edge of the nucleus

  25. Results: PS4 Without lamin taken into account  change in orientation is visible

  26. PS 12, 3+lama

  27. PS 12, 4+lama

  28. Results • Three different thresholding techniques are compared using a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with a significance level of 5% if 0.05 < p < 0.95 then equal distribution

  29. Questions

More Related