Loading in 3 Seconds
Chapter 4 Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems. The Millennium bridge required many degrees of freedom to model and design with. Extending the first 3 chapters to more then one degree of freedom. The first step in analyzing multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) is to look at 2 DOF.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Chapter 4 Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems
The Millennium bridge required
many degrees of freedom to model
and design with.
Extending the first 3 chapters to more then one degree of freedom
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Fig 4.1
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
A 2 degree of freedom system used to base
much of the analysis and conceptual
development of MDOF systems on.
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Figure 4.2
k2(x2 -x1)
m2
k1 x1
m1
x2
x1
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The two equations can be written in the form of a
single matrix equation (see pages 272-275 if matrices and vectors are a struggle for you) :
(4.4), (4.5)
(4.6), (4.9)
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
IC’s can also be written in vector form
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
For 1DOF we assumed the scalar solution aeltSimilarly, now we assume the vector form:
(4.15)
(4.16)
(4.17)
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The determinant results in 1 equation
in one unknown w(called the characteristic equation)
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
(4.20)
(4.21)
Eq. (4.21) is quadratic inw2so four solutions result:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
This yields vector equation for each squared frequency:
Each of these matrix equations represents 2 equations in the 2 unknowns components of the vector, but the coefficient matrix is singular so each matrix equation results in only 1 independent equation. The following examples clarify this.
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Each value of w2 yields an expression or u:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
2 equations, 2 unknowns but DEPENDENT!
(the 2nd equation is -3 times the first)
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Note that the other equation is the same
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Several possibilities, here we just fix one element:
Choose:
Choose:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Here we have introduce the name
mode shape to describe the vectors
u1 and u2. The origin of this name comes later
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
We have computed four solutions:
(4.24)
Since linear, we can combine as:
(4.26)
Note that to go from the exponential
form to to sine requires Euler’s formula
for trig functions and uses up the
+/- sign on omega
determined by initial conditions.
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
If IC’s correspond to mode 1 or 2, then the response is purely in mode 1 or mode 2.
x1
x2
k1
k2
m1
m2
Mode 1:
x2=A
x1=A/3
x1
x2
k1
k2
m1
m2
Mode 2:
x2=A
x1=-A/3
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
At t=0 we have
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
4 equations in 4 unknowns:
Yields:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The final solution is:
(4.34)
These initial conditions gives a response that is a combination of modes. Both harmonic, but their summation is not.
Figure 4.3
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Determines how the second
frequency contributes to the
response
Determines how the first
frequency contributes to the
response
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Then M is said to be positive definite
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
A matrix M is defined to be symmetric if
A symmetric matrix M is positive definite if
A symmetric positive definite matrix M can be factored
Here L is upper triangular, called a Cholesky matrix
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
For a symmetric, positive definite matrix M:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Window 4.1 page 285
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
(4.43)
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
(4.44)
To see this compute
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The first normalized eigenvector
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
(4.37)
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
called a matrix of eigenvectors (normalized)
P is called an orthogonal matrix
(4.47)
P is also called a modal matrix
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
From the previous example:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
In general:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The equations of motion:
Figure 4.4
In matrix form these become:
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Yes!
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Does this make any difference?
No! Try it in the previous example
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
However, they can also be solved on
calculators with matrix functions and
with the codes listed in the last section
In fact, for more then two DOF one must
use a code to solve for the natural
frequencies and mode shapes.
Next we examine 3 other formulations for
solving for modal data
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
From equation (4.17)
(4.53)
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Is the Generalized Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem
easy for hand computations, inefficient for computers
(ii) Is the Asymmetric Eigenvalue Problem
very expensive computationally
(iii) Is the Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem
the cheapest computationally
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech