Loading in 5 sec....

Development of a high-sensitivity torsion balance to study the thermal Casimir force (and more..)PowerPoint Presentation

Development of a high-sensitivity torsion balance to study the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

- 86 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Development of a high-sensitivity torsion balance to study the thermal Casimir force (and more..)' - jerrod

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Development of a high-sensitivity torsion balance to study the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

Woo-Joong Andy Kim

Sept 22, 2011

Department of Physics

Seattle University

It all starts from a simple idea the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

Casimir Force the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

- Macroscopic effects of quantum fluctuations

- Scaling law distinct from the gravitational and electric forces

- Retarded van der Waals interaction at large separations.

- The force can be re-derived from the Lifshitz formula.

Force-distance measurements the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

- Simple force-distance measurements using an AFM or a torsion balance

- Two metal plates facing each other and brought closer to separations down to submicron meter.

- Due to experimental difficulty with parallelism, a sphere-plane configuration is often employed.

- What are distinct types of interaction forces one can expect to observe from a measurement?

✔

✔

Patch force ( the thermal Casimir force (and more..)Fpatch)

- Exists despite that the electric forces are minimized with contact potentials may not be completely nullified [1].

- Must be distinguished from the actual forces of thermal and quantum fluctuations (e.g. Casimir/Lifshiz force)

- Different models of patch force have been discussed, but it is not very clear how to apply a particular model for a given experiment [3-5].

- In a realistic experiment, only the sum is measured. At the minimized condition V=Vm,

[1] W. J. Kim and U. D. Schwarz, J. Vac. Sci and Tech. B 28 C4A1 (2010).

[2] W. J. Kim et al., PRL 103, 060401 (2009); PRA 81, 022505 (2010).

[3] R. O. Behunin et al. arXiv: 1108.1761 (2011).

[4] B. C. Stipe et al., PRL 87, 096801 (2001) N. A. Burnham et al, PRL 69, 133 (1992)

[5] A. Naji et al., PRL 104, 060601 (2010).

Experimental: How do we measure it? the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

Feedback plates

Pivot point

V0+δV

Casimir plates

V0-δV

PID controller

Generates δV

PZT actuator

667 nm Diode Laser

Quadrant photodetector

Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller puts out correction voltage δV, which is proportional to a force exerted on test plates.

Just remember.. the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

Force is directly proportional to SPID

SPID=SDC+δV

Contains distance-dependent force, such as

Curvature analysis I the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

Electrostatic calibration

d0 allows to assess the absolute distance

Interesting to verify if d0 coincides with the actual distance e.g. Prof. H. B. Chan’s on-chip device.

- Parabola curvature analysis
- Calibration factor ()
- Absolute distances (d)

Contact potential analysis II the thermal Casimir force (and more..)

Very important!

Vmis not necessarily constant. In fact, it may change with distances

[1] W. J. Kim, M. Brown-Hayes, D. A. R. Dalvit, J. H. Brownell, and R. Onofrio PRA 78 020101 (R) (2008)

[2] de Man, K. Heeck, and D. Iannuzzi. PRA 79 024102 (2009); de Man, K. Heeck, R. J. Wijngaarden, and D. Iannuzzi. J. Vac. Sci and Tech. B 28 C4A25 (2010).

[3] W. J. Kim, A. O. Sushkov, D. Dalvit

S. K. Lamoreaux. PRL 103, 060401 (2009)

Measured range from 100 μm to 100 nm: de Man, K. Heeck, R. J. Wijngaarden, and D. Iannuzzi. J. Vac. Sci and Tech. B 28 C4A25 (2010).

3 orders of magnitude

Most AFM measurements: 100-500 nm

[4] G. Torricelli, I. Pirozhenko, S. Thornton, A. Lambrecht, and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011).

[5] G. Torricelli et al. PRA 82 010101 (R) (2010)

[7] S. E. Pollack, S. Schlamminger, and J. H. Gundlach. PRL 101, 071101 (2008).

[6] Q. Wei et al., PRA 81, 052115 (2010).

V and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Contact potential difference (CPD)- CPD cannot be measured with a voltemeter!

- Kelvin probe microscopy (KPM) can measure this. Essentially, this is a minimizing condition for a force between two plates

- Same as work function? Not really..

- A combination of work function, surface potential patches (spatially varying), charging effects, and wire connections..

Naïve picture of an ideal situation and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Perfectly smooth, homogeneous samples

Unique values of capacitance and contact potential

When electrostatic force is minimized, it’s always nullified

In reality.. and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

More realistic picture of the situation and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Distance-dependent

contact potentials!

Fpatch(d)

Distance-dependent

Electric force even Vm!

Electrostatic force is no longer nullified AND

It could interfere with other distance-dependent forces

of great physical interest

The situation becomes more complicated in a real experiment

The CPD is an old problem… and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011) GP-B/LISA/LIGO Ion-trap/neutral atom exp

[1] Bridgman. Phys. Rev 14, 306 (1919).

[2] Dowling. Phys. Rev. 25, 812 (1925).

[3] Dowling. Phys. Rev 31 244 (1928).

[4] B. R. Rose, Phys. Rev 44 585 (1933).

[5] C. W. Oately. Proc. Royal Society of London: Math and Phys. 155 218 (1936).

[6] H. H. Uhlig. J. Appl. Phys. 22 1399 (1951).

Contact potential variation at different temperature/CPD between the solid and liquid phases

[1-3].

Measurements on contact potential difference between faces of copper single crystals. Found CPD greater than 463 mV. “This is much great than was anticipated for a symmetrical cubic crystal and indicates desirability of extending the investigation to other crystals” [4]

Volta potentials of the Copper-Nickel alloys and several metals in air. Test of temporal stability [6]

Patch effect being the largest systematic errors for Gravity probe B: PRL 106 221101 (2011).

Physics 4, 66 (2011)

http://physics.aps.org/articles/v4/66:” All that is gold does not glitter”

Noncontact atomic force microscopy (NC-AFM) and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011) Fluctuation induced friction measurements (in the early 90s) Particle physics: Freely falling electrons under the influence of gravity (in the 70s)

[1] F. Bocquet, L. Nony, C. Loppacher, and T. Glatzel. PRB 78 035310 (2008) short range electrostatic force/ variation of contact potential with respect to z distance as well as lateral position.

[2] G. H. Enevoldsen, T. Glatzel, M. C. Christensen, J. V. Lauritsen, and F. Besenbacher.

PRL 236104 (2008) Atomic scale surface potential variation using KPM

[3] M. Lucchesi, G. Privitera, M. Labardi, D. Prevosto, D. Capacciloli, P. Pingue.

arXiv:0901.0500 (2009) Repulsive/attractive electric force depending on CPD.

Review paper: W. J. Kim and U. D. Schwarz, J. Vac. Sci and Tech. B 28 C4A1 (2010)

Distance-Dependent Forces and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Casimir force due to quantum vacuum fluctuation

Coulombian force due to spatial fluctuation of patches

Some critical questions we should be asking:

How do we distinguish between the two?

Could the surface effect ever be accurately and precisely taken into account in a precision force measurement?

If not, could one ever observe a pure Casimir force in a realistic experiment employing a pair of real samples that necessarily bear defects and inhomogeneity to some degrees?

Do you have any suggestions?

Our experiment and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Nano rotator

(360 rotation)

Position-sensitive

Photodetector (PSPD)

3-axis position stage

with peltier (TEC) cooler

Pump system: Diffusion

Roughing (not shown)

Schematic of our torsion balance and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Feedback plates

Pivot point

V0+δV

F

Casimir plates

V0-δV

PID controller

Generates δV

PZT actuator

667 nm Diode Laser

Quadrant photodetector

Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller puts out correction voltage δV, which is proportional to a force exerted on test plates.

Feedback plates (for compensation) and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Casimir plates and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Preliminary data for feedback control and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011) Time (sec) Photodetector (V)

Sensitivity and C. Binns. EPL 93 51001 (2011)

Tungsten fiber d=76 μm has been etched in copper solution by electrochemistry and is now firmly held in place. The fiber length is currently set to l=20 cm.

The torsion has mass m=97.3 g, and its thermal angular fluctuations for the swinging (gravitational) pendulum mode is

This is much smaller than the torsional angular fluctuation, which comes from angular restoring torque given by

Here, α is the torque coefficient similar to “spring constant” and is an intrinsic quantity for our tungsten fiber. α=2.9x10-6 N m/rad

Based on fluctuation-dissipation theorem, the rms force noise.

The angular resolution of the photodiode is estimated to be

δθ=0.5 mV/μrad. This is based on 6 mm photodiode diameter with max output voltage of 10 V at a distance of 30 cm from the detection mirror.

Conservative estimate for force resolution, if the angular tilt of 1 μrad is assumed, is about 30 pN. This is equivalent to the Casimir force at a few μm separation in a typical sphere-plane configuration.

The entire balance will be put together in vacuum inside a bell jar. Both roughing and diffusion pumps have been installed. Target pressure 10-7 torr to be achieved soon.

Michelson noise. ’s interferometer for PZT calibration

Independent PZT calibration using a He-Ne laser (632.816 nm)

Vibration isolation table (floating)

PZT sweep noise. Fringe changes Full period= λ/2 Relate the period to a change in voltage applied to PZT to obtain a calibration factor. (630 nm/V) Visibility over 90% achieved.

Research directions noise.

1. Precision electric force microscopy: (a) Look for size-dependent contact potentials, force constant, and surface patch forces at large distances. (b) Employ KPM to collect information about local patches. (c) Investigate the behavior of electrostatic scaling exponent over many order of distances.

2. Thermal Casimir force revisited: How do we properly separate the two contributions (Fcas & Fpatch)? Extend the measurement range to 10 μm or more

3. The Casimir force in graphene sample noise.

M. Bordag et al., PRB 74 205431 (2006)

M. Bordag et al., PRB 80 245406 (2009)

Bo. E. Sernelius EPL 95 57003 (2011)

V. Svetovoy et al., arXiv:1108.3856v1

Large-area synthesis seems

feasible now!!!

Science 324 1312 (2009)

We are currently working with Dr. Daniil Stolyarov at Graphene Laboratories to deposit a thick layer of graphene flakes on Si/SiO2 substrate by polymer free method (Testing stage).

Conclusion noise.

Reported recent developments of a torsion balance at Seattle University.

Critical investigations on how to understand the relevant contributions in the total force measured from a force-distance experiment even at the minimized electrostatic condition. That is,

Fcas VS. FPatch

The problem is not only ours, but also in many other research fields in physics: GP-B, LISA/LIGO, ion trap/neutral atom exp, and NC-AFM, and perhaps more. This unique problem is likely to bring together scientists from different fields of physics.

Acknowledgements noise.

- Murdock Charitable Trust
- Research Corporation (SI-CCSA)
- Startup funds made possible by the College of Science and Engineering at Seattle University
- University of Washington NanoTech User Facility (NTUF)
- The project is completely to be carried out by undergraduate students and myself: Todd Graveson and Charlie Rackson

Special thanks to:

Dr. Diego Dalvit

Dr. Roberto Onofrio

Dr. Cheol Park

Dr. Steve Lamoreaux

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..