Group Dynamics and Performance in Team sports.

1. Group Dynamics and Performance in Team sports. P5/ M3/D2

2. Group: “Two or more persons who are interacting with each other in such a manner that each person influences and is influenced by each other person”. What defines a group? - Interaction between the members. - Positive feelings towards each other. - A collective identity distinctive from other groups. - A sense of shared purpose or objectives Team: “A good team is more than a group of skilled players; members need to work together effectively to be successful. Steiner (1972)”. What examples can you think of to back this up??? - Football, Ryder Cup, Lions Group Processes Ensure all members understand their own role. Making sure that members accept their role. Acknowledging informal roles where they are helpful to the group and dealing with unhelpful informal roles (e.g. troublemakers)

3. Using the paper as stepping stones: • Get across the room without falling into the water”. If you step off any paper it will float off down the river. Task

4. Becoming a team is a process… Tuckman and Jensen (1977): Forming Group Comes together Storming Period of conflict as roles and status within group are tested Norming As conflict subsides, co-operation to common goals Performing Group works together to achieve mutual goals. Relationships are established. New members to group undergo the same process Group Development How did the task reflect that process???

5. How do we know this is a group? • Give examples of the roles in this team (formal and informal). • How can they make this group more effective? • Which stage would this group be in?

6. Actual productivity = Potential productivity – losses due to faulty group processes. Actual Productivity= The actual performance Potential productivity= The best possible performance achievable based on group resources (ability/knowledge/skill) Process loses= Due to working as part of a group (loss in motivation/ lack of communication/ loss of confidence/ reliance on other players etc) Group effectiveness: Steiner (1979) EG: Tug of war team: - Individually they can pull 100kg each, yet as a team of 4 they can only pull 360kg in total… why?

7. Need to improve skill level and performance of players whilst reducing the faulty processes mentioned before. • But HOW can they do that??? • Clarify roles, better tactics, selection of players, improve fitness… What can coaches do????

8. Tug of war experiment= More men pulling, the less effort each individual put in. Tendency for individuals to lessen their effort when pat of a group. Ringlemann Effect: SOCIAL LOAFING When in groups performers are motivated to work, yet save their best performance when under scrutiny/ alone.

9. What is Cohesion?? Find a definition… Task Cohesion: The degree to which group members work together and are committed to reaching common goals. Social Cohesion: The degree to which group members like each other and get on. Cohesion More positive relationship between task cohesion and performance than between social cohesion and performance

10. (Type of sport) – cohesion facilitates in interactive sports eg team sports; • (Stability) – more stable gives more time for cohesion to develop; • (Group size) – smaller groups have greater cohesion because of more interaction; • (External threats) – increase cohesion by forcing members to ignore internal divisions; • (Status) similarity of status/age/ability aids cohesion; • Satisfaction with rest of group aids cohesion; • Group success increases cohesiveness” Factors that affect Cohesion:

11. One of the defining features of a group is that its members have common beliefs. As the group develops so do these norms which members of the group are committed to. Those who challenge the norms also challenge the group’s solidarity; hence groups exert pressure on their members to conform to these norms. The leader of the group’s role is to set and maintain these norms. • If a group is to be successful there needs to be an element of success. • It has been suggested that cohesion develops as a direct result of success. • It is assumed the more cohesive a group, the better the chance of victory. Cohesion and Team performance:

12. HUMAN KNOTS… In teams of 6-8, each team forms a small circle. Ask them to extend their right hand across the circle and hold the left hand of the other team member opposite them. Then extend their left hand across the circle and hold the right hand of another group member. The task is to unravel the spider's web of interlocking arms without letting go of anyone's hands Were you a group or a team? What skills did you have to use in order to achieve the task aim? TASK…

13. Leadership Leaders determine how a task is completed… How is their role different from managers? “Behavioural process of influencing individuals and groups towards goals” Barron, 1977

14. PRESCRIBED leaders… Are appointed by a person of authrority, for example a chairman appointing a manager or manager appointing a coach. EMERGENTleaders… Emerge from a group and take over responsibility, for example John Terry becoming the England captain or Chris Robshaw being the England rugby captain. Leaders… How would both of these differ in terms of how the captain is received by his team mates??

15. To help understand effective leadership… • Trait Approach • Behavioural Approach • Interactional Approach Theories:

16. Born/ predisposed to leader personality traits A person who is a good leader in one situation is a good leader in all situations Trait Approach: • What stable and common personality traits can you think of, that leaders must have?

17. Leadership skills can be developed through experience and training” Behavioural Approach: Learn leadership behaviours from other effective leaders.

18. The interaction between the person and the situation”… Interactional Approach: • Can predict leaders on personality • Leadership is dependent on certain situations, as some function better in certain situations • Leadership styles change to suit the situation

19. Modern theories from Chelladurai and Saleh (1980) suggest that effective leadership vary depending on: CHARACTERISTICS of the ATHLETES, the LEADER and SITUATION. If the leader behaves appropriately for the particular situation and such behaviour matches the group personalities… this will result in their best performance. Multidimensional model of sport leadership:

20. Different leaders find different styles successful in one situation and not in another… Democratic Behaviour: - Athlete is involved in the decisions regarding the group goals/ strategies Autocratic Behaviour: - Coach/ leader forces decisions o the group independently Social Support Behaviour: - Developing group relationships, in order to improve well being of the group Positive Feedback Behaviour: - Rewarding individual and group actions through acknowledgement of effort and performance Different Leadership styles:

21. For P5, learners must identify four factors which influence group dynamics and performance in team sports. This should include aspects of group processes, cohesion and leadership. This could be based on the observation of a game or match; learners could observe the changes in behaviour due to changes in the situation.

22. P5: Group processes (e.g groups or teams, stages of group development and theories regarding group effectiveness) Cohesion (e.g task and social cohesion, team climate and factors effecting cohesion) Leadership (e.g qualities and behaviour, prescribed versus emergent leaders, and theories of leadership)

23. For M3, which links to P5, learners must explain the four factors which influence group dynamics and performance in team sports. Analysing the positive and negative factors on performance