1 / 9

Integrate ACNS into CSUL (Recommendation 2.b)

Integrate ACNS into CSUL (Recommendation 2.b). Don Albrecht, Scott Baily , Tom Moothart , Dennis Ogg , Rusty Scott. Analysis . Overall agreement regarding The roles of central IT and CSUL will change substantially in 5-10 years We must adapt accordingly

jera
Download Presentation

Integrate ACNS into CSUL (Recommendation 2.b)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrate ACNS into CSUL(Recommendation 2.b) Don Albrecht, Scott Baily, Tom Moothart, Dennis Ogg, Rusty Scott CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  2. Analysis Overall agreement regarding The roles of central IT and CSUL will change substantially in 5-10 years We must adapt accordingly Significant potential for synergies Library services should be “core” (similar to RamCT, KFS, etc.) Best to keep ACNS “whole” CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  3. Benefits and Risks • Benefits • Implements the strategic vision of the TF • Elevates CSUL services to “core campus” level • Adds depth and breadth to both organizations • Establishes the importance of ACNS as an academic support unit • Risks • Reorganizations are stressful and disruptive • Perceptions of service priorities • Uncertainty of status of CIO/Dean dual role CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  4. Task Prioritization • Establish AD for Digital Services – in process • Help Desk Integration – done • Reorganization of ACNS/CSUL – Medium • Secondary to aligning CSU/CSUL budgets CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  5. Proposed Central IT OrganizationACNS & Libraries IT CIO Dean of Libraries Library Tech Serv. ACNS Windows Middleware RamCT Networking IT Security RamTech Unix R & D CSS CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  6. Operationalization • Conditions • Central IT departments must report to the CIO • Strategic importance at campus level • No issues reporting to Dean/CIO • Must re-evaluate should dual-role change • Interaction with campus • Informational at this time • More involvement as initiatives develop CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  7. IR Integration - Background • IR performs System of Record reporting • IR holds the only high quality longitudinal data at the institution – our ‘institutional memory’ • Critical to preserve the data and the knowledge base in IR • IR receives support from ACNS, and synergies were obtained therefrom • IR interacting well with IS has been very beneficial (both under the CIO) CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  8. IR Integration • Ambivalent insofar as agreement • Analysis • IR operates relatively independently from CSUL; the only synergy would be with ACNS • There is synergy with IS, under the CIO, and this should be preserved • First determine what happens with the CIO position and with ACNS • Prioritization – Low, pending decisions presented above CSUL Retreat - 2.b

  9. Discussion • Questions and Comments are most welcome CSUL Retreat - 2.b

More Related