1 / 58

Non-Accidental Trauma (NAT) in Pediatric Patients

Non-Accidental Trauma (NAT) in Pediatric Patients. Steven Frick, MD Original Author: Michael Wattenbarger, MD; March 2004 New Author: Steven Frick, MD; Revised August 2006. Caffey,1946. 6 Children with chronic Subdurals and long bone fractures

jenski
Download Presentation

Non-Accidental Trauma (NAT) in Pediatric Patients

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non-Accidental Trauma (NAT) in Pediatric Patients Steven Frick, MD Original Author: Michael Wattenbarger, MD; March 2004 New Author: Steven Frick, MD; Revised August 2006

  2. Caffey,1946 • 6 Children with chronic Subdurals and long bone fractures • Investigation of infants with long bone fx’s and subdural hematoma

  3. Battered Child SyndromeKempe, 1962 • Resulted in increased public awareness

  4. Myth • Easy to recognize child with NAT

  5. Recognition of NAT Important • Unrecognized and return to home - 25% risk of serious injury, 5% risk of death • Recognize and get child into safe environment • Abuse second leading cause of mortality in infants and children

  6. How Widespread a Problem? • 1 - 1.5% of children are abused per year • 70,000 - 2,000,000 children are abused annually in US.

  7. Quoted Risk Factors for NAT • Young • First born children • Premature infants • Disabled children • Stepchildren

  8. Quoted Risk Factors for NAT • Single-parent homes • Drug - abusing parents • Families with low income • Children of parents who were abused

  9. Signs of NAT • Inconsistent history of injury • Delay in presentation • Reported mechanism of injury insufficient to explain injury • Parents/caregivers may be hostile or indifferent

  10. Evaluation • Team approach helpful - pediatrician, medical social worker, subspecialties, law enforcement, government child protection agencies • Orthopaedic surgeon may be alone in recognition and documentation

  11. Risk Factors • Children of all ages, socioeconomic backgrounds, family types may be subjects of abuse • Up to 65% may have only isolated long bone fracture

  12. Child Abuse - Epidemiology • >1 million children/year are victims of abuse and/or neglect • >1,200 deaths/year • Fractures are 2nd most common presentation of physical abuse • 1/3 of abused children eventually seen by orthopaedic surgeon

  13. Child Maltreatment - 1995 Study • Neglect 52% • Physical abuse 25% • Sexual abuse 13% • Emotional maltreatment 5% • Medical neglect 3%

  14. Child Maltreatment • >50% - < 7 years old • 26% < 4 years old • Most maltreated children abused by birth parents • Over 50% involve substance abuse by parents

  15. Fractures in Abused Children • 25-50% of children with documented NAT will have fx’s • 31% of child NAT victims had fx’s

  16. Isolated Long Bone FractureLoder, JPO 1991 • Most common orthopaedic presentation of children with NAT - 65% of children with fx’s • Only 13% of children with fractures presented with multiple fractures in different stages of healing

  17. NAT Fx Pattern • Most are similar to accidental trauma fracture patterns • Must rely on other factors, history, physical examination, etc... • Age of child with specific fx’s

  18. Associated Features of NAT • Multiple fractures in different stages of healing • Soft tissue injuries - bruising, burns • Intraabdominal injuries • Intracranial injuries

  19. Flags for NAT • AGE of Patient • History • Social Situation • Other injuries (current and past) • Specific injuries/ fractures

  20. Age of Battered Children

  21. Who is at Risk? • Most children with NAT fractures - age of < 3 years

  22. Who’s at Risk? • Most femur fx’s in children who are < 1 yo of age are from NAT (60-70%) • Most femur fx’s in children > 1 yo accidental

  23. Features that Increase Chance of NAT • Inappropriate clinical hx • Failure to seek medical attention • Discovery of fx in healing state

  24. History • Is the injury consistent with the explanation given? • Is the explanation consistent with the child’s level of development? • Does the story change between caregivers? between child and caregiver?

  25. History • Has there been a delay in seeking medical treatment? • Is the parent reluctant to give an explanation? • Drug or alcohol abuse? • Parents in abusive relationships?

  26. History • Is the affect inappropriate between the child and the parents? (lack of concern, overly concerned) • Poor compliance with past medical treatment • Adults were victims of child abuse • Families under stress (loss of job, etc..)

  27. History - Associated Risks • Children born to adolescent parents • Children who suffer from colic • The abused child may be overly compliant and passive or extremely aggressive • Role reversal

  28. Physical Examination • Undress the child • Look for areas of bruising • Bruises at different stages of healing

  29. Physical Examination • Careful search for signs of acute or chronic trauma • Sign - bruises, abrasions, burns • Head - examine for skull trauma, palpate fontanelles if open, consider funduscopic exam for retinal hemorrhage • Trunk - palpate rib cage, abdomen • Extremities - careful palpation • Genitalia – consider exam for sexual abuse

  30. Fractures Commonly seen in NAT - High Specificity • Femur fracture in child < 1 year old • Humeral shaft fracture in < 3 year old • Sternal fractures • Metaphyseal corner (bucket-handle) fractures • Posterior rib fxs • Digit fractures in nonambulatory children

  31. Radiographic W/U • Skeletal survey for children with suspicion of NAT • “Babygram” not sufficient as does not provide necessary detail to identify fractures

  32. 2 yo Girl with Proximal and Distal Humerus Fx, L2-L3 Fx-Dislocation

  33. Radiographic Work-Up • Skeletal survey • AP/LAT skull, AP/LAT axial skeleton and trunk, AP bilateral arms, forearms, hands, thighs, legs, feet • Repeat skeletal survey at 1-2 weeks can be helpful

  34. Fractures in Different Stages of Healing

  35. Bone Scan • Usually reserved for highly suspicious cases with negative skeletal survey • Good at picking up rib fx’s and vertebral fx’s • Repeat bone scan at 2 weeks can identify occult injuries

  36. Radiographic Findings in NAT • Fracture pattern not specific (spiral, transverse, etc.) • Multiple fractures at different stages of healing highly specific

  37. Myths • Spiral Fractures have a high association with NAT • Actually commonly seen accidental fx pattern

  38. Fracture Types • Transverse Most common in NAT • Also very common Accidental

  39. Fracture Types • Spiral can occur accidently • Spiral only 8-36% of fx’s in NAT series • Toddlers fx common accidental injury

  40. Corner Fractures • Traction/rotation mechanism of injury • Planar fracture through primary spongiosa, creates disklike fragment of bone/cartilage, thicker at periphery

  41. Metaphyseal or Bucket Handle Fx’s • Pathognomonic of NAT

  42. Metaphyseal or Bucket Handle Fx’s • Mechanism – traction and twisting • Planar injuries through the primary spongiosum • May be picked up at autopsy when not seen on x-ray

  43. Metaphyseal Bucket HandleFx

  44. Frequent NAT Fx’s and Accidental Fx’s • Mid clavicular fx’s • Simple linear skull fx’s • Single diaphyseal fx’s

  45. Humerus Fx’s • Diaphyseal fx’s in children < 3 yo are very suggestive of NAT!!!!!!!

  46. Humerus Fx’s • Most common fx in some series • Supracondylar fx’s common in accidental trauma • Transphyseal fx’s - high association with NAT

  47. Transphyseal Humerus • Common in NAT • Line up radial shaft intersects capitellum, but capitellum displaced from distal humerus

  48. Transphyseal Distal Humerus Fracture

  49. Management - NAT Suspected • Professional, tactful, nonjudgmental approach in initial encounter and workup • Explain workup to parents as standard approach to specific ages/injury patterns • Early involvement of child protection team if available • Early contact/involvement of child’s primary care physician

  50. Management - Documentation • Many cases result in medical records becoming part of legal record • Carefully document history, physical exam and radiographic findings • Document evidence supporting physical abuse • Document statement regarding level of certainty of abuse

More Related