Mcwgcoop 07feb14
Download
1 / 13

MCWGCoop 07Feb14 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 61 Views
  • Uploaded on

MCWGCoop 07Feb14. Austrian experiences with OCC Participation in Operations Impacts on Transformation Col NADERER Otto, AUT Delegation to NATO. OUTLINE. Austrian Level of Ambition Participation in Operations and Impacts on Transformation Lessons learned Conclusions. OCC AUT AMBITION.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' MCWGCoop 07Feb14' - jensen


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Mcwgcoop 07feb14

MCWGCoop 07Feb14

Austrian experiences with OCC

Participation in Operations

Impacts on Transformation

Col NADERER Otto, AUT Delegation to NATO


Outline
OUTLINE

  • Austrian Level of Ambition

  • Participation in Operations and Impacts on Transformation

  • Lessons learned

  • Conclusions


Occ aut ambition
OCC AUT AMBITION

  • Since 2004

  • Current framework

    • Evaluation of „Rapid Deployable Units“ (RDU)

    • Evaluation of units participating in international operations (KFOR, EUFOR/ALTHEA, UNIFIL) during the preparation phase

  • Aim

    • test / improve interoperability

    • improve military capabilities (Focus BN –level)

    • harmonize the national evaluation system with NTL and AFS


Units that successfully passed the whole programme
Units that successfully passed the whole programme

2010

MOTINF BN

MECHINF COY

RECCE COY (Re-Evaluated in 2013)

CBRN COY (Re-Evaluated in 2013)

2013

GENERAL SUPPORT ENGINEER COY

MP PLT

EOD PLT

CIMIC TEAM

FIELD HUMINT TEAM

TACTICAL PSYOPS TEAM


Examples 1 occ e f evaluated units by 2012 for eu bgs
Examples (1) OCC E&F evaluated units by 2012 for EU-BGs

MOTINFBN (APC)

MECHINF COY (IFV)

RECCE COY (MOT/IFV)

CBRN COY

EOD PLT

AB 212 HELI DET

CARGO TRUCK COY ENGINEER COY

(-) CSSBN

PSYOPS TEAM

EUBG


Examples 2 deployment to kfor
Examples (2) - Deployment to KFOR

II

MNBG (W)

II

MNBG (E)

COMKFOR

JFCN – DSACEUR

Activation Order

to the Nations

AP PRISTINA

C130

APODHÖRSCHING

FAA FC PRZ


Examples 3
Examples (3)

Until 2010 only „Operational Rehearsals“ in the mission area BALKAN

During the unrests in the northern part of Kosovo, ORF were permanently deployed in the mission area from aug11 until jan13

AUTCON 8/ORF, ZUPCE, northern part of Kosovo, nov11


AUTCON 12/

ORFBn

KFOR

AUTCON 12/

ORFBn

KFOR

national

reinforcement

BALKANS

KFOR

KOSOVO

IR-COY

ALTHEA

BiH

EUTM MLI

MALI

EUFOR ALTHEA

BiH

Current Operations

UNIFIL

LEBANON

TrspCoy

MINURSO

WESTERNSAHARA

MilObs

2

379

168

201

4

ISAF

AFGHANISTAN

StaffO

Total : +/- 782

3 D NTM

3

8

UNTSO

Middle East

MilObs

EUSEC

RD CONGO

Experts

111

5

7 D FOC

1

RACVIAC

CROATIA

Specialists

UNFICYP

CYPRUS

StaffO

135

4

1

5 D NTM

UNOWA

WESTERNAFRIKA

EUMM

GEORGIA

MilObs

250

1

5


Pool of evaluators
Pool of Evaluators

  • The Austrian Armed Forces are disposing of more than 70 trained evaluators at different levels

  • In 2014 we support various OCC evaluations with 12 evaluators in countries like

    • ARM, AZE, GEO, BiH, MNE, SWE…

  • And we receive support from outside!


Impacts on transformation
Impacts on Transformation

  • Achievements:

    • Improvement in interoperability of established RDU

    • Lessons Identified/Lessons Learned

      • in TTPs

      • in Procurement

    • Synchronization of national regulations and training directives (ongoing)

    • Combining national Ex with OCC Evaluations


Lessons learned
Lessons Learned

  • The national „Readiness-Check“ of units is a challenge, but a useful burden

    • Time consuming before being standard

    • It took years to be cost-effective

    • Increasing acceptance

  • Prerequisites for the effective use of the OCC E&F Tool

    • Harmonisation of national regulations and training directives with AFS (ongoing)

    • No training without evaluation

    • Evaluator pool including international exchange of evaluators (~ 15 per year)


  • Conclusions
    Conclusions

    • OCC E&F is a challenge, but

      • It is a precise tool for assessing interoperability

      • With its “FFR” clearly offers basis for force development

      • Continues to be essential for further development of national regulations, training and exercise

      • Best preparation for units in the whole spectrum of international crisis management

      • Best influence on Interoperability and Transformation!



    ad