teaching students how to evaluate calculation results
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Teaching Students How to Evaluate Calculation Results

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 32

Teaching Students How to Evaluate Calculation Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 70 Views
  • Uploaded on

Teaching Students How to Evaluate Calculation Results. James Hanson, Ph.D, PE Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference March 27, 2009. Overview. Motivation How evaluation is done How to teach it Reinforcing it in HW How well it works.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Teaching Students How to Evaluate Calculation Results' - jeanne


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
teaching students how to evaluate calculation results

Teaching Students How to Evaluate Calculation Results

James Hanson, Ph.D, PE

Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference

March 27, 2009

overview
Overview
  • Motivation
  • How evaluation is done
  • How to teach it
  • Reinforcing it in HW
  • How well it works
motivation
Motivation
  • Not in textbooks
  • Reliance on computers
  • Experience is retiring!
how evaluation is done
How Evaluation is Done

Study Performed

  • Interview 35 practitioners
  • Ten firms
  • Experience: 1-55 years
how evaluation is done1
How Evaluation is Done

Categories of Evaluation Tools for Analysis Results

  • Fundamental Principles
  • Approximations
  • Features of the Solution
how to teach it
How to Teach It
  • Structural Engineering
  • Electrical Engineering
  • Other Examples
fundamental principles for structural engineering
Fundamental Principles(for Structural Engineering)
  • Statics
    • Equilibrium always
  • Mechanics of Materials
    • Strain distribution
    • Stiffness attracts load
approximations for structural engineering
Approximations(for Structural Engineering)
  • Simplify loading
  • Simplify geometry
  • Assume material behavior
approximations example

Actual

Approximate

P/3

P/3

P/3

w = P/L

L/4

L/4

L/4

L/4

L

Mmax = PL/6

Mmax = PL/8

Difference= – 25%

Approximations Example
features of the solution for structural engineering
Features of the Solution(for Structural Engineering)
  • Boundary conditions
  • Continuity
  • Fundamental principles

Use…

To…

  • Anticipate graphical features
  • Bound possible solution
features of solution example

T

= – M

C

C

= + M

T

+

M

Features of Solution Example

Construct the moment diagram:

1. Sketch displaced shape

2. Deduce sign of moment from curvature

3. Construct diagram

electrical engineering examples
Electrical Engineering Examples

Fundamental Principles:

Circuit analysis governed by Ohm’s Law and Kirchoff’s Current Law

Approximations:

DC circuit with capacity approximated as open circuit

DC circuit with inductor approximated as a short

Features of the Answer:

Ripples in frequency response of filter relates to order of the filter

Thanks to Dr. Yoder, ECE Dept, RHIT

how to teach it1
How to Teach It

Other Examples

  • Fundamental Principles
  • Approximations
  • Features of the Solution
how to teach it2
How to Teach It

Metacognition

Def: Sequence of steps followed by a person to monitor and improve that person’s own cognitive performance in an area

How: Set up student so intuition leads to wrong conclusion, then ask to reflect on why went wrong

metacognition

(a)

(b)

Metacognition

Which way will right end deflect (up or down)?

reinforcing it in hw
Reinforcing It in HW
  • Guess part of the solution (instructor choice)
  • Generate approximate solution (text prob?)
  • Use computer for solution
  • Identify expected features in computer solution
  • Verify fundamental principles in computer solution
  • Make comprehensive argument that computer result is reasonable
  • Compare guess with solution and reflect on why similar/different
  • Guess part of the solution (instructor choice)
  • Generate approximate solution (text prob?)
  • Use computer for solution
  • Identify expected features in computer solution
  • Verify fundamental principles in computer solution
slide18

Reinforcing It in HWExample

Problem Statement:

An indeterminate beam experiences uniformly distributed load.

Objective:

Find vertical reactions.

slide19

Reinforcing It in HWExample

a) Guess the deflected shape

Not graded based on correctness, graded based on whether done

slide20

Reinforcing It in HWExample

b) Generate approximate solution

Assumption: load carried by nearest support

slide21

Reinforcing It in HWExample

c) Use computer for solution

Can use as “black box” if teaching how to evaluate results

slide22

Reinforcing It in HWExample

d) Identify expected features in computer solution

  • Displaced shape features
  • Internal force diagram features
  • Reaction directions
slide23

Reinforcing It in HWExample

SFx = 0

SFy = 0

SM = 0

e) Verify fundamental principles in computer solution

Check equilibrium:

slide24

Reinforcing It in HWExample

f) Make comprehensive argument that computer results are reasonable

Features of Solution

Fundamental Principles

Approximate Result

slide25

Reinforcing It in HWExample

g) Compare guess with solution and reflect on why similar/different

Graded based on candor and depth of reflection, not how similar or different

how well it works attitude

3.1

3.3

3.6

3.5

3.3

2006

33

3.0

Metacognition improved performance in this course

2007

23

3.1

2008

32

3.1

4 – Strongly Agree

1 – Strongly Disagree

How Well It WorksAttitude

Statement

Year

n

Average

2004

30

(ctrl)

Undergrads should be able to determine reasonableness of results

2005

46

2006

42

2007

29

2008

39

how well it works behavior

74%

74%

78%

How Well It Works Behavior

Statement

Year

n

Affirmative

2006

42

I use metacognition more now than before course

2007

30

2008

40

how well it works behavior1

Statement

n

Average

(Respond 1 yr after course)

2006

39

I use fundamental principles, approx, and features of soln to evaluate in other areas of civil

2006

39

I now use metacognition … than before the course

5 – Almost Always

5 – Much More

1 – Much Less

1 – Never

How Well It Works Behavior

3.5

3.6

how well it works cognitive

50%

49%

67%

70%

66%

69%

69%

69%

69%

73%

How Well It Works Cognitive

Structural Mechanics I Course (Required)

Correctly Identify Most Reasonable

Correctly Explain Why Reasonable

Term

n

Fall 2004 (Ctrl)

34

Fall 2005

48

Fall 2006

44

Fall 2007

30

Fall 2008

42

Practitioners

8

92%

72%

how well it works cognitive1

35%

46%

43%

44%

49%

65%

48%

71%

59%

68%

How Well It WorksCognitive

Structural Mechanics II Course (Elective)

Correctly Identify Most Reasonable

Correctly Explain Why Reasonable

Term

n

Winter 2004 (Ctrl)

9

Winter 2005

9

Winter 2006

17

Winter 2007

11

Winter 2008

16

Practitioners

8

65%

58%

summary
Summary
  • Evaluation of results can be taught
  • Fundamental principles, approximations, features of the solution
  • Metacognition might help
acknowledgements
Acknowledgements

Sponsor

Grant: DUE-0341212

Participating Firms

Center for Structural Engineering Education

http://www.rose-hulman.edu/csee

Questions or comments: [email protected]

ad