- 70 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Teaching Students How to Evaluate Calculation Results' - jeanne

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Teaching Students How to Evaluate Calculation Results

James Hanson, Ph.D, PE

Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference

March 27, 2009

Overview

- Motivation
- How evaluation is done
- How to teach it
- Reinforcing it in HW
- How well it works

Motivation

- Not in textbooks
- Reliance on computers
- Experience is retiring!

How Evaluation is Done

Categories of Evaluation Tools for Analysis Results

- Fundamental Principles
- Approximations
- Features of the Solution

How to Teach It

- Structural Engineering
- Electrical Engineering
- Other Examples

Fundamental Principles(for Structural Engineering)

- Statics
- Equilibrium always
- Mechanics of Materials
- Strain distribution
- Stiffness attracts load

Approximations(for Structural Engineering)

- Simplify loading
- Simplify geometry
- Assume material behavior

Approximate

P/3

P/3

P/3

w = P/L

L/4

L/4

L/4

L/4

L

Mmax = PL/6

Mmax = PL/8

Difference= – 25%

Approximations ExampleFeatures of the Solution(for Structural Engineering)

- Boundary conditions
- Continuity
- Fundamental principles

Use…

To…

- Anticipate graphical features
- Bound possible solution

= – M

C

C

= + M

T

+

M

–

Features of Solution ExampleConstruct the moment diagram:

1. Sketch displaced shape

2. Deduce sign of moment from curvature

3. Construct diagram

Electrical Engineering Examples

Fundamental Principles:

Circuit analysis governed by Ohm’s Law and Kirchoff’s Current Law

Approximations:

DC circuit with capacity approximated as open circuit

DC circuit with inductor approximated as a short

Features of the Answer:

Ripples in frequency response of filter relates to order of the filter

Thanks to Dr. Yoder, ECE Dept, RHIT

How to Teach It

Metacognition

Def: Sequence of steps followed by a person to monitor and improve that person’s own cognitive performance in an area

How: Set up student so intuition leads to wrong conclusion, then ask to reflect on why went wrong

Reinforcing It in HW

- Guess part of the solution (instructor choice)
- Generate approximate solution (text prob?)
- Use computer for solution
- Identify expected features in computer solution
- Verify fundamental principles in computer solution
- Make comprehensive argument that computer result is reasonable
- Compare guess with solution and reflect on why similar/different

- Guess part of the solution (instructor choice)
- Generate approximate solution (text prob?)
- Use computer for solution
- Identify expected features in computer solution
- Verify fundamental principles in computer solution

Problem Statement:

An indeterminate beam experiences uniformly distributed load.

Objective:

Find vertical reactions.

a) Guess the deflected shape

Not graded based on correctness, graded based on whether done

b) Generate approximate solution

Assumption: load carried by nearest support

c) Use computer for solution

Can use as “black box” if teaching how to evaluate results

d) Identify expected features in computer solution

- Displaced shape features
- Internal force diagram features
- Reaction directions

SFx = 0

SFy = 0

SM = 0

e) Verify fundamental principles in computer solution

Check equilibrium:

f) Make comprehensive argument that computer results are reasonable

Features of Solution

√

√

Fundamental Principles

√

Approximate Result

g) Compare guess with solution and reflect on why similar/different

Graded based on candor and depth of reflection, not how similar or different

3.3

3.6

3.5

3.3

2006

33

3.0

Metacognition improved performance in this course

2007

23

3.1

2008

32

3.1

4 – Strongly Agree

1 – Strongly Disagree

How Well It WorksAttitudeStatement

Year

n

Average

2004

30

(ctrl)

Undergrads should be able to determine reasonableness of results

2005

46

2006

42

2007

29

2008

39

74%

78%

How Well It Works BehaviorStatement

Year

n

Affirmative

2006

42

I use metacognition more now than before course

2007

30

2008

40

n

Average

(Respond 1 yr after course)

2006

39

I use fundamental principles, approx, and features of soln to evaluate in other areas of civil

2006

39

I now use metacognition … than before the course

5 – Almost Always

5 – Much More

1 – Much Less

1 – Never

How Well It Works Behavior3.5

3.6

49%

67%

70%

66%

69%

69%

69%

69%

73%

How Well It Works CognitiveStructural Mechanics I Course (Required)

Correctly Identify Most Reasonable

Correctly Explain Why Reasonable

Term

n

Fall 2004 (Ctrl)

34

Fall 2005

48

Fall 2006

44

Fall 2007

30

Fall 2008

42

Practitioners

8

92%

72%

46%

43%

44%

49%

65%

48%

71%

59%

68%

How Well It WorksCognitiveStructural Mechanics II Course (Elective)

Correctly Identify Most Reasonable

Correctly Explain Why Reasonable

Term

n

Winter 2004 (Ctrl)

9

Winter 2005

9

Winter 2006

17

Winter 2007

11

Winter 2008

16

Practitioners

8

65%

58%

Summary

- Evaluation of results can be taught
- Fundamental principles, approximations, features of the solution
- Metacognition might help

Acknowledgements

Sponsor

Grant: DUE-0341212

Participating Firms

Center for Structural Engineering Education

http://www.rose-hulman.edu/csee

Questions or comments: [email protected]

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..