1 / 50

Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology

Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology. Contributions to WIGOS Johan Stander, co-president, JCOMM David Meldrum, co-chair, JCOMM OCG. How to learn to love 3 rd -party data. Difficulties faced by 3 rd party data originators. WMO ID allocation

jdanny
Download Presentation

Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology Contributions to WIGOS Johan Stander, co-president, JCOMM David Meldrum, co-chair, JCOMM OCG How to learn to love 3rd-party data

  2. Difficulties faced by 3rd party data originators • WMO ID allocation • Automatic gross error checking • Coding for GTS/WIS • GTS/WIS insertion • Feedback re • Quality • Quantity • Timeliness • Impact

  3. JCOMMOPS vision definition JCOMMOPS occupies a unique place as the focal point for the practical co-ordination of the in-situ ocean observing system defined by JCOMM. Its role consists of the following core objectives: • to assist in the implementation and deployment of the observing networks through close interaction with programme managers and platform operators, and through Capacity Development and outreach; • to assist in establishing, maintaining and verifying mechanisms for the timely exchange of data and metadata, including the facilitation of quality control and archival functions; • to develop the consistent set of tools needed to monitor the status of the observing system and its attendant data and metadata distribution, so as to identify action areas and improve the overall effectiveness and development of the system.

  4. The supplier/consumer relationship data & metadata consumer supplier

  5. The supplier/consumer relationship data & metadata consumer supplier JCOMMOPS acts as a ‘broker’ between supplier and consumer • FEEDBACK: • quality • quantity • timeliness

  6. Quality feedback tools

  7. Quality feedback tools

  8. Quality feedback tools

  9. Quality trend over 10 years: drifter SLP

  10. Databuoy network: coverage

  11. Databuoy network: coverage

  12. Databuoy network: coverage

  13. Databuoy network: coverage

  14. Databuoy network: coverage

  15. Databuoy network: coverage

  16. Databuoy network: coverage

  17. Databuoy network: coverage

  18. Databuoy network: coverage

  19. Databuoy network: coverage

  20. Databuoy network: coverage

  21. Databuoy network: coverage

  22. Databuoy network: coverage

  23. Databuoy network: coverage

  24. Databuoy network: coverage

  25. Databuoy network: coverage

  26. Databuoy network: coverage

  27. Databuoy network: coverage

  28. Databuoy network

  29. Databuoy network: drifter GTS delays

  30. Databuoy network: drifter GTS delays

  31. Databuoy network: drifter GTS delays

  32. Databuoy network: drifter GTS delays

  33. Databuoy network: drifter GTS delays

  34. Databuoy network: drifter GTS delays

  35. Databuoy network

  36. Databuoy network: AOML view

  37. Databuoy network: AOML view

  38. One output - surface current climatologyhttp://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/dac/dac_animations.php • Will increasingly be used for network design

  39. AOML drifter prediction tool

  40. Databuoy network: OSMC view

  41. Databuoy network: SAILWX.INFO - only simple way for 3rd party operator to view GTS data!

  42. Monitoring: conclusion • Current arrangements: • Too inconsistent to be used easily as a management tool • Do not give reliable status by platform, or by ECV • Probably do not represent best use of combined resources • Further discussion and action underway within JCOMM OPA

  43. Future JCOMM contributions to WIGOS • Closer interaction with satellite community • Pilot projects for in situ surface vector winds / 2D wave spectra / HRSST • Roll-out of climate-quality observations • Ocean heat content and sea-level rise • Deep Argo • Sub-sea cables (ITU/IOC/WMO JTF): dual use for tsunami warning • Improved sea-level network: dual use for tsunami warning • Implementation of Satcom Forum • Importance of GRAs • Biogeochemical observations • Composite network design • OSSEs • Better metrics of system performance

  44. Times are changing… • Questions and comments?

  45. JCOMMOPS Technical Coordinators nos 1 & 2

More Related