1 / 6

Research Data Repository Interoperability WG David Wilcox, Thomas Jejkal Montreal, 09/20/17

Research Data Repository Interoperability WG David Wilcox, Thomas Jejkal Montreal, 09/20/17. CC BY-SA 4.0. Summary of the Problem. Exchange of digital content between repository platforms is challenging Different data models, metadata, semantics, interfaces

jcurley
Download Presentation

Research Data Repository Interoperability WG David Wilcox, Thomas Jejkal Montreal, 09/20/17

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Data Repository Interoperability WGDavid Wilcox, Thomas JejkalMontreal, 09/20/17 www.rd-alliance.org - @resdatall CC BY-SA 4.0

  2. Summary of the Problem • Exchange of digital content between repository platforms is challenging • Different data models, metadata, semantics, interfaces • Current state of the art (e.g. Dublin Core, OAI-PMH, SWORD) well adopted but very limited • Upcoming approaches (e.g. Linked Data Platform, Resource Sync, OAI-ORE) supported by a comparable small subset of platforms • Some varied use cases: migration, replication, cross-domain sharing • Migration between same platform, but different version • Replication between different locations • Share with domain and cross-domain scientists

  3. Status of the Deliverable • D1. Research Data Repository Interoperability Primer (M6) • Use Case description, state of the art and gap analysis • Foundation for further discussions • DOI: 10.15497/RDA00020 • D2. Interface Specification Draft (M12) • Will define no interface but adoptable recommendations • Active WG members agreed on BagIt-based approach • Recommend to follow the BagIt specification as far as possible • Recommend to include basic metadata in well-known standard schema, e.g. Datacite 4.0 • Recommend to provide machine readable profile information

  4. Initial Adopters • First prototype implementation can start as soon as D2 is finished • Create first profile definition(s) for well-known packages • Fedora, DataONE, Data Conservancy, Research Object, DARIAH • Talk to developers of existing BagIt-based packaging solutions • Ask to include basic metadata • Create new / correct existing profile • Demonstrate at least one example migration/replication between two platforms

  5. Expected Impact of the Deliverable • Recommendations that are comparably easy to adopt • Support for both state-of-the-art and legacy platforms • Provide users with a common tool to e.g. transport, exchange or backup their content • Basis for further agreements of package content to improve interpretability of package content

  6. Feedback Desired from RDA Community From Platform Developers: • How do you assess the applicability for your platform? • Where do you see challenges/obstacles for an adoption? • Do you want to be an adopter? From Platform Users: • Do you think our approach will help you? • What do you think is missing?

More Related