1 / 28

Global Perspectives II January 19, 2005 Aliesha R. Crowe UW-Extension-Rusk County

POTENTIAL LOCAL IMPACTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN COUNTY-BASED FACULTY AND STAFF PARTICPATION IN THE PARTNERS OF THE AMERICAS FARMER-TO-FARMER PROGRAM IN NICARAGUA: A DELPHI STUDY. Global Perspectives II January 19, 2005 Aliesha R. Crowe UW-Extension-Rusk County. Review: . Globalization

jasper
Download Presentation

Global Perspectives II January 19, 2005 Aliesha R. Crowe UW-Extension-Rusk County

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. POTENTIAL LOCAL IMPACTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN COUNTY-BASED FACULTY AND STAFF PARTICPATION IN THE PARTNERS OF THE AMERICAS FARMER-TO-FARMER PROGRAM IN NICARAGUA: A DELPHI STUDY Global Perspectives II January 19, 2005 Aliesha R. Crowe UW-Extension-Rusk County

  2. Review: • Globalization • Internationalizing Extension • UW-Extension International Work • Farmer-to-Farmer Program • County-based faculty and staff only

  3. Delphi Technique Methodology • Expert Panel selection • Round 1 question • Round 2 questionnaire • Round 3 questionnaire • Three-round summary

  4. Results • Logic Model • Short-term impacts • Medium-term impacts • Long-term impacts

  5. Logic model

  6. Results • Short-term Impacts • Defined—Learning, Awareness • Global perspectives for local clientele/community • Global Perspectives for Agent/Colleagues

  7. Results • Medium-term Impacts • Defined—Action taken; behavior, policy, practice change • Professional development/personal benefits in terms of action taken • Action of/for clientele

  8. Results • Long-term Impacts • Defined—Change in conditions • Operating Globally

  9. Short-term Outcomes-Impact A. Global Perspectives for local clientele/community

  10.  Create awareness of the difficulties experienced in Nicaragua—that they are many times worse than what we face and for the most part we should consider ourselves fortunate (even though we face marketing, pricing, and regulatory problems of our own). • The description of my project work included observations about resource limitations and problems encountered by agricultural producers and the CONAGAN organization. Identifying these resource limitations and problems are very helpful in local program development. Too often, we take for granted the many resources we have.

  11. Individuals learn about the projects, the people of Nicaragua, the Nicaraguan culture, and the way agriculture is practiced there. • Local committee learns about many of the differences (and some of the similarities) of how agriculture is practiced in the two countries.

  12. I believe many of the people who I address are enlightened about the conditions in Nicaragua (both good and bad), and that they gain a better appreciation for what life is like here in Wisconsin. • Local people get a better understanding of agriculture, culture, life in a third world country.

  13. Increased cultural awareness • Through local publicity(newspapers, etc) and presentations, citizens learned of the challenges facing individuals in the communities where Partners volunteers lived and worked.

  14. Short-term Outcomes—Impact B. Global Perspectives for Agent/Colleagues

  15. Participation helps the agent gain a new understanding and appreciation of people living in developing countries. • Participation helps the agent to appreciate some of the struggles our country’s original agriculturalists faced when settling the land in this country. • Colleagues in Extension learn a lot about people living in developing countries from listening to participant agent experiences.

  16. Participation reminds the agent of the importance of economic development--maintaining/improving local infrastructure and leadership. • Provides agent with a life experience to bring to work and community.

  17. Medium-Term Impacts A. Professional development/personal benefit in terms of action taken

  18. The work with both the university faculty, the partner agency and the producers helped me develop patience and sensitivity toward working with others. • Overall, and most importantly, the work built my confidence in a variety of ways—in a relatively short period, I used critical listening skills, identified issues, problems and resources and thought through and put together an appropriate/effective response.

  19. Working on these projects has helped me to think of new ways to solve practical problems that farmers in our area face when capital or infrastructure are lacking. • I have much better appreciation now for the fragility of our local landscape and the necessity for being good stewards of our environmental and agricultural resources. • The experience I had interacting with and teaching farmers in Nicaragua required a great deal of flexibility and imagination at times, and have helped me improve my teaching abilities here at home.

  20. My participation made me a more effective teacher and facilitator in content areas such as strategic planning, needs assessment, facilitation of open discussions. • Teaching experience that can be used locally.

  21. Ability to compare adult learning styles and non-traditional ways of teaching. • It was also a great way to recharge my batteries—bring new creativity and energy to local programming.

  22. Medium-term Impacts B. Action of/for clientele

  23. Impacts were listed on original surveys, but the panel did not indicate any were likely or very likely.???????

  24. Long Term Outcomes-Impact Operating Globally

  25. Participation may result in local groups/individuals getting involved in exchange or programs that could help communities in Nicaragua.

  26. Potential Long Term Impacts The questions to ask: • Do they exist? • In this program? • In other programs? • How do we measure them? • How do we communicate them to stakeholders?

  27. Recommendations • 1. Future studies should determine if cultural differences within the county of assignment affect the impact of international work. • 2. Assessment of local impact of international work should occur at the local level in order to articulate potential benefits. • 3. In developing an internationalized extension program the objectives/goals and expected benefits should be clearly articulated to participants and stakeholders. • 4. Future research should include other UW-Extension international extension work. • 5. Future research should include other UW-Extension faculty and staff that are not county-based.

  28. References • Taylor-Powell, E., Steele, S., & Douglah, M. (1996). Planning a program evaluation. Retrieved April 2002, from University of Wisconsin-Extension-Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit Web site: http://www1.uwex.edu/ces/pubs/pdf/G3658_1.PDF • Crowe, A. (2004) Masters Thesis. POTENTIAL LOCAL IMPACTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN COUNTY-BASED FACULTY AND STAFF PARTICPATION IN THE PARTNERS OF THE AMERICAS FARMER-TO-FARMER PROGRAM IN NICARAGUA: A DELPHI STUDY.

More Related