1 / 8

e-Design Methods and Tools to Facilitate Manufacturing Process Optimization

e-Design Methods and Tools to Facilitate Manufacturing Process Optimization. Douglas Eddy, Dr. Ian Grosse, Dr. Sundar Krishnamurty, Dr. Jack Wileden UMass Amherst. Project Status. Project Type: Continuing Research Thrust Area: Design Optimization Percent Complete: 3 0 %

jasper
Download Presentation

e-Design Methods and Tools to Facilitate Manufacturing Process Optimization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. e-Design Methods and Tools to Facilitate Manufacturing Process Optimization Douglas Eddy, Dr. Ian Grosse, Dr. Sundar Krishnamurty, Dr. Jack Wileden UMass Amherst

  2. Project Status • Project Type: Continuing • Research Thrust Area: Design Optimization • Percent Complete: 30% • Start Date: 2/16/10 • Expected Completion Date: 12/31/10 • Funding • NSF Program Funds - 0% • Other Funds - 100%

  3. Problem Statement • Small sized industry partners do not always have internal engineering design capabilities. • A market opportunity exists for a more functional design. • The process could enable the collaborative transfer of e-Design knowledge.

  4. Approach and Methods • Three different potential design concepts identified: Cable on Pulleys Straps on Pins Roller Chain Option • Use the e-Design Ontology’s framework for: • FEA and ANSYS analysis • Design decision process • Design optimization

  5. Related Works • Drawbacks with current design: • Exhibits sway greater than 20” • Breakage of cables after about 350 cycles • Quick release can cause the mast to come crashing down • Competitor products: • Costly • Rise to the 30 feet height cantake significantly longer than the desired speed for the payload

  6. How Ours is Different • Design process utilizes high end design methods and tools to verify and validate. • Provides knowledge of the interoperability between two different CAD systems (Pro/E and Solid Works) • Technology Transfer of design knowledge from UMass e-Design team to an industry partner • Captures and maintains semantic information using UMass Amherst’s ontology-based e-Design framework

  7. Deliverables and Benefits • Deliverable: • A completely developed and validated design specification to enable production. • Benefits: • Ontology knowledge instance information • Sales in an initial estimated quantity of 1000 – 3000 • Creation of 50-60 jobs in the Precision Machining sector of the Western Massachusetts region

  8. Project Plan 1) Development of several proof of design concept prototypes – 3 months 2) Evaluation of design options using the e-Design framework – 1 month 3) Development and/or modification for optimization – 1 month 4) Identification of Critical Function Features, Quality Control Plan, FEA analysis, and Design for Manufacturability and Assembly (DFMA) – 1 month 5) Theoretical Design Validation to enable a prototype build – ½ to 1 month 6) Completion of prints/specifications for manufacturing – ½ to 1 month 7) Refinement and improvements based on results– 1 to 2 months 8) Reliability analysis – 1 to 1 ½ months 9) Create an ontology instance – 1 to 1 ½ months

More Related